Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457917
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457916
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170457858
[Test build #49106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49106/console)
for PR 10690 at commit
[`0225afa`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456629
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456618
**[Test build #49104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49104/consoleFull)**
for PR 10693 at commit
[`1d24aaa`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170456634
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170454414
**[Test build #49105 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49105/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`a4bd6e8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170453751
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170453753
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170453736
**[Test build #49089 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49089/console)**
for PR 10690 at commit
[`f4027aa`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170453672
**[Test build #49104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49104/consoleFull)**
for PR 10693 at commit
[`1d24aaa`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170453655
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693#issuecomment-170453653
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170453116
cc @JoshRosen I'm going to merge this so other pull requests don't fail.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170452892
[Test build #49106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49106/consoleFull)
for PR 10690 at commit
[`0225afa`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170452844
**[Test build #49105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49105/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`a4bd6e8`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170452583
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170452578
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170452580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170452584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170452545
**[Test build #49101 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49101/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`4c945ef`](https://g
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170452044
I've opened https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693 to hotfix the
exclusions. In the 1.5 and 1.6 backport branches, I've re-scoped the changes to
only exclude `org
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10693
[HOTFIX][test-maven][SPARK-12734] Fix bug in Netty exclusions
This is a hotfix for a build bug introduced by the Netty exclusion changes
in #10672. We can't exclude `io.netty:netty` because Akka
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170451451
**[Test build #49101 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49101/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`4c945ef`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170451240
Let me do more investigation tomorrow. @davies : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170451017
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170451016
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170450971
**[Test build #49100 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49100/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`f83365c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170449853
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170449852
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170449720
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170449717
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170449790
**[Test build #49094 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49094/consoleFull)**
for PR 10689 at commit
[`6244975`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170449465
**[Test build #49097 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49097/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`f83365c`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170447499
**[Test build #49100 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49100/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`f83365c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170446190
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170446186
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170446175
**[Test build #49099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49099/consoleFull)**
for PR 8760 at commit
[`d94bdd7`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170445768
**[Test build #49099 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49099/consoleFull)**
for PR 8760 at commit
[`d94bdd7`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170445163
**[Test build #49097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49097/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`f83365c`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170444907
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#discussion_r49293105
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -606,6 +606,12 @@
${akka.group}
akka-remote_${scala.binary.version}
${akka.version}
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170444609
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10672#issuecomment-170444677
I discovered that the now-removed `netty.io:netty` dependency places its
classes under the `org.jboss.netty` namespace, so I guess there's not a
conflict between `net
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170444610
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170444236
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170444301
@gatorsmile Thanks for working on this, but after this patch, TPCDS
Q12/Q20/Q98 are still can't be resolved: " cannot resolve 'i_item_id' given
input columns: [i_class,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170444065
**[Test build #49098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49098/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`174b40f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170443571
**[Test build #49092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49092/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
[`18091f7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170443593
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170443591
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170442518
**[Test build #49095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49095/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#issuecomment-170442349
**[Test build #49094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49094/consoleFull)**
for PR 10689 at commit
[`6244975`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49292315
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -521,16 +521,31 @@ class Analyzer(
*/
objec
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#discussion_r49292180
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQlSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +50,16 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest {
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-170442019
@squito @kayousterhout @mridulm do you have any further comments on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49292140
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -521,16 +521,31 @@ class Analyzer(
*/
objec
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#discussion_r49292062
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQlSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +50,16 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest {
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692
[SPARK-12652][PySpark][WIP]Upgrade Py4J to 0.9.1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zsxwing/spark py4j-0.9.1
Alternatively you ca
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170439459
This is NOT ready to merge; it looks like these exclusions have somehow
catastrophically broken tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170439442
This is NOT ready to merge; it looks like these exclusions have somehow
catastrophically broken tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170438966
**[Test build #49092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49092/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
[`18091f7`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436786
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436774
**[Test build #49093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49093/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`5b3815a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436782
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170436196
**[Test build #49093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49093/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`5b3815a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436166
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436168
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#issuecomment-170436089
After talk with @mwws offline, we probably need to serialize the
`accumulator` variables as well.
I personally agree with @srowen, we need to think provi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-170436106
**[Test build #49087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49087/consoleFull)**
for PR 10480 at commit
[`991a9b7`](https://g
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#discussion_r49290887
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -25,17 +25,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434507
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434505
**[Test build #49091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49091/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
[`4ae1ce7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434508
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#issuecomment-170434435
**[Test build #49091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49091/consoleFull)**
for PR 10646 at commit
[`4ae1ce7`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689#discussion_r49290681
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQlSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +49,11 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691#issuecomment-170431156
**[Test build #49090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49090/consoleFull)**
for PR 10691 at commit
[`7ed7e9d`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#discussion_r49290212
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -398,6 +395,7 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <: Tree
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10646#discussion_r49290162
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -398,6 +395,7 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <: TreeN
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289994
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for Seria
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690#issuecomment-170429827
[Test build #49089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49089/consoleFull)
for PR 10690 at commit
[`f4027aa`](https://gi
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10691
[SPARK-12734][BUILD] Backport Netty exclusion + Maven enforcer fixes to
branch-1.6
This patch backports the Netty exclusion fixes from #10672 to branch-1.6.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428534
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428533
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10690
[SPARK-12734][BUILD] Backport Netty exclusion + Maven enforcer fixes to
branch-1.5
This patch backports the Netty exclusion fixes from #10672 to branch-1.5.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170428472
**[Test build #49084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49084/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
[`c173399`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428263
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428259
**[Test build #49088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49088/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`fb9cb7d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428264
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170428142
**[Test build #49088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49088/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`fb9cb7d`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289420
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for Serializati
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289367
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for Serializati
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49289326
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +126,24 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for Serializati
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427636
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10688#issuecomment-170427560
**[Test build #49083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49083/consoleFull)**
for PR 10688 at commit
[`1397c43`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
