Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170831507
**[Test build #49226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49226/consoleFull)**
for PR 10716 at commit
[`d8a08ed`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-170830746
I found the sorting columns could be partially resolved by different nodes.
For example,
```select a.c1, b.c2 from t1 a, t1 b order by b.c3, a.c3```
I n
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170830036
```import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.{And, Expression,
LessThan}```
should be moved above
```import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.Ext
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10717#issuecomment-170829529
**[Test build #49225 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49225/consoleFull)**
for PR 10717 at commit
[`4d681fa`](https://gi
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170829182
@gatorsmile did you add more additional options for the scalastyle
checking? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170828507
No idea what's wrong of the scala style at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563/files#diff-6b86ffad85512d0ada66fc317c11a7fdR24
And I cannot reprodu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170828330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170828321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170827526
**[Test build #49216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49216/consoleFull)**
for PR 10628 at commit
[`36c8ddb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170827125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170827117
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170826809
**[Test build #49215 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49215/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`3db993c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170825726
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170825717
**[Test build #49224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49224/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`1edfd96`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170825721
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170825546
**[Test build #49224 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49224/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`1edfd96`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170823538
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170823541
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170823384
**[Test build #49221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49221/consoleFull)**
for PR 10719 at commit
[`fc95915`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10721#issuecomment-170820889
[Test build #49223 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49223/consoleFull)
for PR 10721 at commit
[`27ba586`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170820641
**[Test build #49222 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49222/consoleFull)**
for PR 10716 at commit
[`5c03a76`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170820702
**[Test build #49221 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49221/consoleFull)**
for PR 10719 at commit
[`fc95915`](https://gi
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10721
[SPARK-12685] [MLlib] [Backport to 1.4]word2vec trainWordsCount gets
overflow
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12685
master PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10627
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695#issuecomment-170818106
**[Test build #49220 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49220/consoleFull)**
for PR 10695 at commit
[`3a9acaa`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170816813
**[Test build #2366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2366/consoleFull)**
for PR 10716 at commit
[`e7c8475`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10720#issuecomment-170816317
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user sloth2012 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10720
fix CountVectorizer.transform's lost transformSchema
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12765
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170815258
LGTM. Let's wait till Jenkins comes back for the latest commit to merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170814907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170814910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#discussion_r49420144
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -25,17 +25,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170814381
**[Test build #49211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49211/consoleFull)**
for PR 10718 at commit
[`1de98a6`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170813485
**[Test build #2367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2367/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`7ae30e1`](https://
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#discussion_r49419855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +230,230 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[Ex
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#discussion_r49419833
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +230,230 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[Ex
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10694#discussion_r49419795
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +230,230 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[Ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10714#issuecomment-170813362
**[Test build #49219 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49219/consoleFull)**
for PR 10714 at commit
[`20d8e7b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-170813326
**[Test build #2367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2367/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`7ae30e1`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170813156
**[Test build #49218 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49218/consoleFull)**
for PR 10718 at commit
[`5ddba9d`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10539#issuecomment-170811672
@ankurdave @jkbradley I tried to replace calls to
`GraphImpl.fromExistingRDDs(vertices, edges)` with `Graph(vertices, edges)` as
@ankurdave suggested. And the two tests
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#discussion_r49419245
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -25,17 +25,26 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10653#discussion_r49418852
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashOuterJoin.scala
---
@@ -78,8 +78,11 @@ trait HashOuterJoin {
@transie
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170809136
**[Test build #49217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49217/consoleFull)**
for PR 10719 at commit
[`e2202c8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170809143
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170809146
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10628#issuecomment-170808713
**[Test build #49216 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49216/consoleFull)**
for PR 10628 at commit
[`36c8ddb`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#issuecomment-170807040
**[Test build #49217 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49217/consoleFull)**
for PR 10719 at commit
[`e2202c8`](https://gi
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719#discussion_r49418548
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Logging.scala ---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
trait Logging {
// Make the
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10653#discussion_r49418490
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashOuterJoin.scala
---
@@ -78,8 +78,11 @@ trait HashOuterJoin {
@transie
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10719
[SPARK-12692][BUILD][CORE] Scala style: Fix the style violation (Space
before "," or ":")
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643
You can merge this pu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170805649
**[Test build #49215 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49215/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`3db993c`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170801917
> @zsxwing Could you also update the patch for callback server to use new
API? see bartdag/py4j#147
Updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10686
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#discussion_r49417467
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ class Column(protected[sql] val expr: Expression)
extends Logging {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#discussion_r49417454
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/dsl/package.scala ---
@@ -61,9 +61,11 @@ package object dsl {
trait ImplicitOperators
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#discussion_r49417462
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Decimal.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ final class Decimal extends Ordered[Decimal] with
Serial
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10686#issuecomment-170801117
Thanks - merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170800180
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170800178
**[Test build #49214 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49214/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`461c1ce`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170800182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170799968
**[Test build #49214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49214/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
[`461c1ce`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170799816
**[Test build #2366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2366/consoleFull)**
for PR 10716 at commit
[`e7c8475`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#issuecomment-170798338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170798362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#issuecomment-170798336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10716#issuecomment-170798361
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170798176
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170798175
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170797923
**[Test build #49210 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49210/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`174b40f`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695#issuecomment-170797489
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-170797582
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695#issuecomment-170797491
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695#issuecomment-170797260
**[Test build #49209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49209/consoleFull)**
for PR 10695 at commit
[`c731a93`](https://g
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#discussion_r49416447
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2093,6 +2093,95 @@ class RFormulaModel(JavaModel):
"""
+@inherit_doc
+class ChiSq
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170792354
Thanks - I'm going to merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718#issuecomment-170792188
**[Test build #49211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49211/consoleFull)**
for PR 10718 at commit
[`1de98a6`](https://gi
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10718
[SPARK-12692][BUILD][SQL] Scala style: Fix the style violation (Space
before "," or ":")
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643.
You can merge this pu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10715
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10715#issuecomment-170779018
I'm going to merge this into master, branch-1.6, and branch-1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10146#issuecomment-17010
**[Test build #2365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2365/consoleFull)**
for PR 10146 at commit
[`a709f49`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10715#issuecomment-170774143
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10715#issuecomment-170774141
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10715#issuecomment-170774079
**[Test build #49206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49206/consoleFull)**
for PR 10715 at commit
[`2acca58`](https://g
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#discussion_r49412666
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/types.R ---
@@ -47,6 +47,19 @@ COMPLEX_TYPES <- list(
# The full list of data types.
DATA_TYPES <- as.environment(c(as.list(PRI
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#discussion_r49412620
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -581,6 +579,10 @@ setGeneric("unionAll", function(x, y) {
standardGeneric("unionAll") })
#' @export
setGener
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170773423
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170773425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10685#issuecomment-170773257
**[Test build #49199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49199/consoleFull)**
for PR 10685 at commit
[`0055761`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10717#issuecomment-170772477
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10717#issuecomment-170772471
**[Test build #49207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49207/consoleFull)**
for PR 10717 at commit
[`61fc9e1`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170772468
**[Test build #49208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49208/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`cfc2f75`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170772472
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170772473
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10717#issuecomment-170772475
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10712#issuecomment-170771778
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10526#issuecomment-170772250
**[Test build #49210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49210/consoleFull)**
for PR 10526 at commit
[`174b40f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10717#issuecomment-170772298
**[Test build #49207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49207/consoleFull)**
for PR 10717 at commit
[`61fc9e1`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-170772269
**[Test build #49208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49208/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`cfc2f75`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10695#issuecomment-170771927
**[Test build #49209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49209/consoleFull)**
for PR 10695 at commit
[`c731a93`](https://gi
1 - 100 of 749 matches
Mail list logo
