GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10737
Improve CaseWhen codegen by removing got variable with "if/else".
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12771
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171206219
**[Test build #49302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49302/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`aa33df0`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171206338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171206336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171205637
**[Test build #2374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2374/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`aa33df0`](https://
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#discussion_r49559144
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SemiJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,9 +109,26 @@ class SemiJoinSuite extends Spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171201579
**[Test build #49302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49302/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`aa33df0`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171202444
**[Test build #49303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49303/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`a3a9103`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-171201485
**[Test build #2374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2374/consoleFull)**
for PR 10706 at commit
[`aa33df0`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-171201370
We discussed this and decided this is a simple config change users can
apply. Changing the behavior automatically for users in a point release is also
bad.
---
If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49558156
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ object functions extends LegacyFunctions {
* @since
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-171200917
Yes, cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-171200576
only backport it without bucket-write?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49557974
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -183,32 +175,38 @@ case class CaseWhen(bran
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49557801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -183,32 +175,38 @@ case class CaseWhen
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49557719
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -81,44 +81,39 @@ case class If(predicate: E
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49557554
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10638#issuecomment-171199355
@cloud-fan Should we create a patch for 1.6 branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49557461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -81,44 +81,39 @@ case class If(predica
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#issuecomment-171198669
@viirya Yeah, we can merge this in first.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49557393
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49557216
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -521,38 +522,81 @@ class Analyzer(
*/
o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171197657
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171197638
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171197660
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171197636
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171197610
**[Test build #49299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49299/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`8181c3a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171197512
**[Test build #49291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49291/consoleFull)**
for PR 10154 at commit
[`70ab748`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49556863
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -81,44 +81,39 @@ case class If(predicate: E
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#discussion_r49556745
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -81,44 +81,39 @@ case class If(predica
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49556790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -521,38 +522,81 @@ class Analyzer(
*/
objec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10735#issuecomment-171196008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10735#issuecomment-171196003
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10735#issuecomment-171195995
**[Test build #49298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49298/consoleFull)**
for PR 10735 at commit
[`f05524c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-171195484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-171195482
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-171195513
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10735#issuecomment-171195494
**[Test build #49298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49298/consoleFull)**
for PR 10735 at commit
[`f05524c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-171195516
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-171195234
**[Test build #49292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49292/consoleFull)**
for PR 10731 at commit
[`b72547b`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10736#issuecomment-171195115
**[Test build #49301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49301/consoleFull)**
for PR 10736 at commit
[`44b3698`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-171194947
**[Test build #49293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49293/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`2a29e56`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#issuecomment-171193912
**[Test build #49300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49300/consoleFull)**
for PR 10029 at commit
[`832db06`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49556422
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ class Analyzer(
ResolveGroup
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10736
[SPARK-12692][BUILD]Enforce style checking about white space before comma
We have removed all of white spaces before comma from code so let's enforce
style checking.
You can merge this pull reques
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#issuecomment-171191441
@davies Understood. Since the time to come out a better codegen version for
this is not sure, can we merge this first in?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171191208
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171191211
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r49556199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ class Analyzer(
ResolveGroupingA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171191106
**[Test build #49297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49297/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`02caff5`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171190598
**[Test build #49299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49299/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`8181c3a`](https://gi
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10735
[SPARK-12796] [SQL] Whole stage codegen
This is the initial work for whole stage codegen, it support
Projection/Filter/Range, we will continue work on this to support more physical
operators.
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171189195
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49555926
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49555900
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49555736
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#issuecomment-171184876
@viirya One question is that: we are moving to do more codegen staff (whole
stage codegen), but the ImperativeAggregate can't support that, not sure will
we do another c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-171184333
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-171184337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-171183014
In this update, the code changes are trying to extend the existing support
for the following scenario: ```sort by attributes that are not present in the
SELECT claus
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171182889
**[Test build #49297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49297/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`02caff5`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732#issuecomment-171182648
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732#issuecomment-171182625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732#issuecomment-171182626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732#issuecomment-171182451
**[Test build #49290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49290/consoleFull)**
for PR 10732 at commit
[`13ccbfa`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49555196
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49554701
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49554635
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-171180163
**[Test build #49294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49294/consoleFull)**
for PR 8760 at commit
[`25a7c6f`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49554615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-171179476
**[Test build #49295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49295/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
[`1c2d42b`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49554363
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171177410
Great. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49553700
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -350,6 +350,13 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
T
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171177209
@yhuai I will make the change in a follow up PR re-using the same JIRA.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171177077
@yhuai Thank you very much !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49553587
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -350,6 +350,13 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
T
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171176382
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171176359
Actually, let me change the title while merging it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#issuecomment-171176251
Can you remove the `WIP` from the title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-171175930
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-171175931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10703#issuecomment-171175832
**[Test build #49288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49288/consoleFull)**
for PR 10703 at commit
[`005c1db`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-171175160
**[Test build #49292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49292/consoleFull)**
for PR 10731 at commit
[`b72547b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-171172724
**[Test build #49293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49293/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
[`2a29e56`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171169376
**[Test build #49291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49291/consoleFull)**
for PR 10154 at commit
[`70ab748`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10399#issuecomment-171169128
ping @rxin @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#issuecomment-171169101
ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171168930
Here's a small screen shot of the change (note I changed GC threshold to 1%
for this example)
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13952758/12285584/7e9217c6
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-171168853
Because SQLContext still uses DDLParser, looks like I can't simply remove
`describeTable` command from DDLParser. So I can't gradually migrate these
three commands in th
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10154#issuecomment-171168341
@tgravescs I've added GC Time (in parens) to the Task Time column and added
a tool tip explaining the coloring and what GC Time is. I agree these are
probably good ad
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49551543
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -200,41 +200,60 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49551474
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -189,6 +189,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49551487
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -123,6 +115,39 @@ case class Except(left: L
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10732#issuecomment-171165543
**[Test build #49290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49290/consoleFull)**
for PR 10732 at commit
[`13ccbfa`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171159670
**[Test build #49289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49289/consoleFull)**
for PR 10734 at commit
[`829c3ad`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171159772
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10734#issuecomment-171159766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
1 - 100 of 535 matches
Mail list logo
