Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173537102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173537104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173538635
**[Test build #49872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49872/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r50390322
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/glm/Families.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#issuecomment-173545758
**[Test build #49875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49875/consoleFull)**
for PR 10639 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10596#issuecomment-173553803
@liancheng @yhuai ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user alpivonka commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5325#issuecomment-173561257
I would like to bring up an opportunity for re-use.
with in the mapred-site.xml (for our implementation) we are using the
following to allow access to mapreduce
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10370#discussion_r50402728
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -440,6 +446,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-173579793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-173579799
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r50390974
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/IterativelyReweightedLeastSquares.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#issuecomment-173554879
**[Test build #49875 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49875/consoleFull)**
for PR 10639 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#issuecomment-173554998
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#issuecomment-173554996
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-173556798
**[Test build #49876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49876/consoleFull)**
for PR 10635 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#issuecomment-173548548
@mengxr Thanks for your comments. For the issue that
```WeightedLeastSquares``` contains extra content such as ```diagInvAWA```, it
will be used to generate
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10631#issuecomment-173552264
@rxin ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-173552368
@yhuai ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10521#issuecomment-173553650
@andrewor14 ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-173553404
@marmbrus ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dsdinter commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9495#issuecomment-173553569
It seems this issue in OJDBC and started to happen after Oracle 11g:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173536939
**[Test build #49873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49873/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173538837
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173538836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-173579529
**[Test build #49876 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49876/consoleFull)**
for PR 10635 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50369722
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -335,31 +342,45 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50369730
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,11 +395,11 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10863#issuecomment-173492042
**[Test build #49867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49867/consoleFull)**
for PR 10863 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50372397
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -335,31 +342,45 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10862#issuecomment-173498061
**[Test build #49869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49869/consoleFull)**
for PR 10862 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#issuecomment-173506673
**[Test build #49871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49871/consoleFull)**
for PR 10788 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10862#issuecomment-173511498
**[Test build #49869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49869/consoleFull)**
for PR 10862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173525273
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173525271
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-173493053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-173493055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10731#issuecomment-173492642
**[Test build #49864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49864/consoleFull)**
for PR 10731 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50372852
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,4 +384,82 @@ class LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173506101
**[Test build #49873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49873/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#issuecomment-173506110
**[Test build #49874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49874/consoleFull)**
for PR 8734 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10864#issuecomment-173506209
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50370169
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,4 +384,82 @@ class LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10862#issuecomment-173494166
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#issuecomment-173518885
**[Test build #49874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49874/consoleFull)**
for PR 8734 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#issuecomment-173519027
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#issuecomment-173519029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mallman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10700#issuecomment-173490509
Here are my current thoughts. Josh says this functionality is going to be
removed in Spark 2.0. The bug this PR is designed to address manifests itself
in Spark 1.5 in
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50370273
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,4 +384,82 @@ class LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-173490560
**[Test build #49861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49861/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173494001
**[Test build #49868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49868/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173507314
**[Test build #49872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49872/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#issuecomment-173519318
**[Test build #49871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49871/consoleFull)**
for PR 10788 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#issuecomment-173519472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173525219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173525124
**[Test build #49868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49868/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173525217
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173525109
**[Test build #49870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49870/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-173527896
**[Test build #49860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49860/consoleFull)**
for PR 10854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-173527952
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-173527954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173491009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173491008
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50370414
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,4 +384,82 @@ class LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173490658
**[Test build #49863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49863/consoleFull)**
for PR 10845 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-173490745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#issuecomment-173493541
LGTM except some styling issues, and concern about caching twice. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50371017
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -374,4 +384,82 @@ class LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-173500763
**[Test build #49870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49870/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10700#issuecomment-173505157
Are there downsides to merging this to master, even if the related
functionality is about to be removed? it passes tests, and seems to improve an
ordering of shutdown,
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#discussion_r50372566
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -335,31 +342,45 @@ class LogisticRegression
GitHub user shijinkui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10864
fix error when run RDDRelation.main():"path file:/Users/sjk/pair.parqâ¦
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12953
fix error when run RDDRelation.main():
"path
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10862#issuecomment-173511839
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10862#issuecomment-173511835
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10788#issuecomment-173519471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10863#issuecomment-173492160
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10863#issuecomment-173492161
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-173607998
**[Test build #2431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2431/consoleFull)**
for PR 10152 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173608093
(Link this to your JIRA -- see guidance here first for how to open a PR:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark )
---
If your project
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491#issuecomment-173606818
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173608775
**[Test build #2432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2432/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173608886
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866
[SPARK-12760] [DOCS] inaccurate description for difference between local vs
cluster mode in closure handling
Clarify that modifying a driver local variable won't have the desired
effect in cluster
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10807#issuecomment-173609582
@felixcheung WDYT?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173609383
**[Test build #2432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2432/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-173609858
@gliptak are you able to follow up on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10491
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user andygrove opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865
improved error message for java type inference failure
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/codefutures/spark SPARK-12932
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-173621659
**[Test build #2431 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2431/consoleFull)**
for PR 10152 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866#issuecomment-173623032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user mortada opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10867
[SPARK-12760] [DOCS] invalid lambda expression in python example for â¦
â¦local vs cluster
@srowen thanks for the PR at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866!
sorry it took me a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10867#issuecomment-173643528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10867#issuecomment-173643525
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-173630521
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10867#issuecomment-173635004
Does it still execute without error on a cluster? (even if it doesn't
actually increment the counter in the way someone might expect.) Certainly if
it doesn't compile
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-173632677
**[Test build #49878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49878/consoleFull)**
for PR 10648 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-173638249
CC @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mortada commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10867#issuecomment-173648674
@srowen I tested the python code in cluster mode (5 ec2 workers) and this
works fine
```
16/01/21 17:33:29 INFO BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Registering
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866#issuecomment-173619459
**[Test build #49877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49877/consoleFull)**
for PR 10866 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866#issuecomment-173623028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10866#issuecomment-173622876
**[Test build #49877 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49877/consoleFull)**
for PR 10866 at commit
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
