Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11566#issuecomment-193531052
@vanzin Sorry. I was looking a wrong place...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11379#issuecomment-193531054
**[Test build #52600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52600/consoleFull)**
for PR 11379 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-193530874
**[Test build #52601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52601/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-193530569
**[Test build #52615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52615/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193530498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193530494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user frreiss commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11184#issuecomment-193530307
This change adds a new attribute `prettyDataType` to about two dozen
different classes. The new attribute is populated with code that is mostly
copied and pasted from
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193530111
**[Test build #52605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52605/consoleFull)**
for PR 11529 at commit
GitHub user olarayej opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569
Added histogram function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added method histogram() to compute the histogram of a Column
**Usage:**
# Create a DataFrame
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11566#issuecomment-193529928
Actually it seems it was @markhamstra and not me (in 17f3075bc).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11184#discussion_r55299643
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ trait NamedExpression extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11568#issuecomment-193527447
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user bomeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11568
[SPARK-13727] [SQL] SparkConf.contains does not consider deprecated keys
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The contains() method does not return consistently with get() if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11523#issuecomment-193527238
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11523#issuecomment-193527240
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11184#discussion_r55298650
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -250,17 +250,46 @@ def corr(col1, col2):
"""Returns a new :class:`Column` for the Pearson
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11523#issuecomment-193527021
**[Test build #52599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52599/consoleFull)**
for PR 11523 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-193526639
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193526622
**[Test build #2614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2614/consoleFull)**
for PR 11529 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-193526633
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11565#issuecomment-193526313
**[Test build #52602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52602/consoleFull)**
for PR 11565 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193525052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193525047
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11529#issuecomment-193524511
**[Test build #52603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52603/consoleFull)**
for PR 11529 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#issuecomment-193523843
@nongli I had updated the doc and commit message (PR description), once it
pass the tests, I will merge this into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11567#issuecomment-193522841
Could you review this please?
@srowen and @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-193522685
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11567#issuecomment-193522667
Currently, Jenkins does not run `lint-java`.
So this failure is not caught before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-193522691
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-193522244
**[Test build #52608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52608/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#discussion_r55297346
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -974,6 +974,35 @@ def dropDuplicates(self, subset=None):
jdf =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-193521618
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11567#issuecomment-193521532
**[Test build #52614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52614/consoleFull)**
for PR 11567 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#discussion_r55297127
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -974,6 +974,35 @@ def dropDuplicates(self, subset=None):
jdf =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-193521621
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11567
[HOT-FIX] Use the new location of `checkstyle-suppressions.xml`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes `dev/lint-java` and `mvn checkstyle:check` failures
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11547#issuecomment-193521102
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-193520951
**[Test build #52594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52594/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11503#issuecomment-193520688
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11503#issuecomment-193520694
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11503#issuecomment-193519839
**[Test build #52606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52606/consoleFull)**
for PR 11503 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11563#discussion_r55296366
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/LogicalPlanToSQLSuite.scala
---
@@ -445,4 +461,86 @@ class LogicalPlanToSQLSuite extends
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11547#issuecomment-193517578
Looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55296297
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -114,27 +117,67 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55296284
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -114,27 +117,67 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11410#discussion_r55296075
--- Diff:
repl/scala-2.11/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ReplSuite.scala ---
@@ -254,6 +254,30 @@ class ReplSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10428#discussion_r55295539
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +121,13 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-193513755
**[Test build #52613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52613/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#issuecomment-193512076
**[Test build #52612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52612/consoleFull)**
for PR 11274 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-193511803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-193511757
**[Test build #52610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52610/consoleFull)**
for PR 11514 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-193511806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55294609
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -39,15 +39,26 @@ case class Project(projectList:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193511261
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193511260
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193510810
**[Test build #52582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52582/consoleFull)**
for PR 11509 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10428#discussion_r55294135
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +121,13 @@ case class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11530#issuecomment-193510043
Thank you, @zsxwing !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11530#issuecomment-193509343
**[Test build #52611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52611/consoleFull)**
for PR 11530 at commit
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10428#discussion_r55293751
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +121,13 @@ case class
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10428#discussion_r55293782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +121,13 @@ case class
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55293764
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastHashJoin.scala
---
@@ -279,17 +277,21 @@ case class BroadcastHashJoin(
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11530#issuecomment-193509236
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user frreiss commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-193508431
LGTM as far as correctness goes. There's still quite a bit of pointer
chasing going on in the generated code, though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#discussion_r55293326
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -974,6 +974,35 @@ def dropDuplicates(self, subset=None):
jdf =
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#issuecomment-193508198
Patch looks good. Just a few documentation suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55293072
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastHashJoin.scala
---
@@ -279,17 +277,21 @@ case class BroadcastHashJoin(
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r55292999
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/codeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11566#issuecomment-193506012
**[Test build #52609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52609/consoleFull)**
for PR 11566 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11566
[SPARK-13711][Core]Don't call SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler in AppClient as
it's in driver
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AppClient runs in the driver side. It should
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55292723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -114,27 +117,67 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-193506060
**[Test build #52610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52610/consoleFull)**
for PR 11514 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11566#issuecomment-193505687
cc @vanzin as you added `Utils.tryOrExit` here
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11563#issuecomment-193505236
Why do we need two separate cases here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11563#discussion_r55292434
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/LogicalPlanToSQLSuite.scala
---
@@ -445,4 +461,86 @@ class LogicalPlanToSQLSuite extends
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55292388
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -114,27 +117,67 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#discussion_r55292326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -114,27 +117,67 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-193503735
**[Test build #52608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52608/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11495
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11495#issuecomment-193501590
Thanks, merging to master and 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559#issuecomment-193498472
Yea, thanks! I will do it next time. As you said, so I will implement
`RandomSampler` interface without iterator for wholestage codegen of `Sampler`.
---
If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193498704
Going to merge this in master.
We should rename HiveFileCatalog to MetastoreFileCatalog. cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559#issuecomment-193497602
BTW next time it'd be great if you can provide the important context for
this pull request directly in the description. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559#issuecomment-193497465
It seems like we shouldn't use iterators for whole stage codegen. The point
is to get rid of iterators. Shouldn't we just have a filter there?
---
If your project is
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11444#discussion_r55290303
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -50,18 +50,60 @@
def _monkey_patch_RDD(sqlContext):
def toDF(self, schema=None, sampleRatio=None):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559#issuecomment-193497090
I will close this now if you really think this is not necessary to better
Java compatibility. However, I will go to implement `RandomSampler` interface
without iterator
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11274#issuecomment-193496493
@davies can you update the gist with the new output?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11559#issuecomment-193496075
@holdenk @rxin I added the Java iterator support due to the wholestage
codegen version of `Sample` in #11517. I was using Scala iterator but as
`RandomSampler`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11533#issuecomment-193494746
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11533#issuecomment-193494753
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-193492763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11533#issuecomment-193494312
**[Test build #52592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52592/consoleFull)**
for PR 11533 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193493845
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193493406
**[Test build #52590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52590/consoleFull)**
for PR 11509 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509#issuecomment-193493854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-193492329
**[Test build #52589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52589/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11530#issuecomment-193492670
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-193492767
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
201 - 300 of 748 matches
Mail list logo
