Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195524921
**[Test build #52941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52941/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
[`ebb25f9`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195522607
**[Test build #52940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52940/consoleFull)**
for PR 11088 at commit
[`2460716`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195522563
**[Test build #52938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52938/consoleFull)**
for PR 11659 at commit
[`e982656`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#issuecomment-195522580
**[Test build #52939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52939/consoleFull)**
for PR 11646 at commit
[`65596df`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195522100
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659
[SPARK-13830] prefer block manager than direct result for large result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current RPC can't handle large blocks very well, it's very slow
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11659#issuecomment-195522189
cc @zsxwing @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195521449
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195521428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195521241
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195521237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195521097
**[Test build #52931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52931/consoleFull)**
for PR 11615 at commit
[`8422f6e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195521193
**[Test build #52936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52936/consoleFull)**
for PR 11088 at commit
[`2460716`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195520664
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#issuecomment-195520611
**[Test build #52937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52937/consoleFull)**
for PR 11573 at commit
[`bd91b0f`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195519349
Updated. The previous PR did not handle the cases of listing files through
spark jobs. I also fixed that part and added the test.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195519288
**[Test build #52936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52936/consoleFull)**
for PR 11088 at commit
[`2460716`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195517234
**[Test build #52935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52935/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
[`858aea2`](https://gi
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55875321
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#issuecomment-195506145
What's the status on this patch? Have we at least tested it manually? At
the very least we should merge it into 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11641
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#issuecomment-195505678
Looks great. Just some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11641#issuecomment-195505420
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11641#issuecomment-195505453
Merging to master. Thanks @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55874631
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exte
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#issuecomment-195505249
**[Test build #52934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52934/consoleFull)**
for PR 11544 at commit
[`228e078`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55874351
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exte
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11650#issuecomment-195501910
Thanks the PR is already here I've merged it.
@lw-lin in the future please batch more fixes like this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#issuecomment-195504342
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55874268
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exte
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11241
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11241#issuecomment-195503487
Note to self: remember to close the issue once JIRA is back up
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11455#discussion_r55873954
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +368,30 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
if (canCompleteReco
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11241#issuecomment-195503369
Merging into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r55873402
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -454,19 +454,51 @@ trait FileFormat {
requiredColumns: Arr
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r55873151
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195500352
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195500349
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195499950
**[Test build #52932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52932/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`45582de`](https://g
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#issuecomment-195497597
sounds good, thank you. In my branch, I try to address (2) by not adding
new conditions if the child node(s) already have the given constraint. For (3),
please no
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#discussion_r55872639
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -36,15 +36,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.cata
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#discussion_r55872166
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -270,9 +270,25 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#discussion_r55871640
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -270,9 +270,25 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195496237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195496238
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195495907
**[Test build #52930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52930/consoleFull)**
for PR 11596 at commit
[`bea871f`](https://g
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#discussion_r55869059
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -270,9 +270,25 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#discussion_r55868740
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -270,9 +270,25 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r55868373
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11640
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195489718
sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11640#issuecomment-195488673
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195488826
**[Test build #52933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52933/consoleFull)**
for PR 11452 at commit
[`fda639b`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11455#discussion_r55867638
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +368,30 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
if (canComplet
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11573#discussion_r55867164
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/bucket.scala
---
@@ -24,12 +27,15 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datas
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195485937
**[Test build #52932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52932/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`45582de`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-195483801
LGTM, could you rebase this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11455#discussion_r55863392
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +368,30 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
if (canCompleteRe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195477414
**[Test build #52931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52931/consoleFull)**
for PR 11615 at commit
[`8422f6e`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-195476480
You are so fast! Will do the review tonight or tomorrow. I have another
test case for this issue. Maybe you can take it. This is Project -- Subquery --
Filter -- Agg
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11615#issuecomment-195476295
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r55862748
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195473838
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195473729
**[Test build #52929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52929/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`2230292`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195473833
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#issuecomment-195472409
A couple of issues I hit when I try to do it.
1. The first issue is the one I submitted earlier regarding the `IsNotNull`
of compound expressions.
2. T
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#issuecomment-195466611
Shouldn't the existing rule for `PushPredicateThroughJoin` automatically
take care of predicate pushdown? By the way, please feel free to take over my
branch if y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195466246
**[Test build #52930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52930/consoleFull)**
for PR 11596 at commit
[`bea871f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195463826
**[Test build #52929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52929/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`2230292`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195463951
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195463505
@sameeragarwal True, we can add it back when needing it. Let me directly
filter it out in `constructIsNotNullConstraints`
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11618#issuecomment-195462388
@sameeragarwal Yeah, it sounds like you already started working on it.
True, I also did a similar thing, but we need to add extra handling for
predicate pu
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11455#discussion_r55858792
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +368,30 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
if (canCompleteReco
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195455108
**[Test build #52928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52928/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`2575fb7`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195455908
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195455913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-195455900
**[Test build #52928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52928/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`2575fb7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-195452965
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-195452256
**[Test build #52926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52926/consoleFull)**
for PR 11658 at commit
[`198b406`](https://g
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195451612
bjorn and I chatted about this a bit more offline, I understand why its a
bit complicated for the non-UI port a bit more, but also feel this simple
change is good enough
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#issuecomment-195440805
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#issuecomment-195440802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#issuecomment-195440652
**[Test build #52927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52927/consoleFull)**
for PR 11152 at commit
[`2895a4f`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#issuecomment-195436124
**[Test build #52927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52927/consoleFull)**
for PR 11152 at commit
[`2895a4f`](https://gi
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11596#issuecomment-195435909
@cloud-fan Can you please help trigger a retest ? This does not seem
related to my changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#issuecomment-195435446
Fixed up the endpoints, added some more detail on app-id vs app-attempt,
using base-app-id for the log retrieval. Also mentioned that after job/stage
GC, there ar
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11152#discussion_r55850527
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -273,8 +309,8 @@ for a running application, at
`http://localhost:4040/api/v1`.
Download the event logs for all at
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-195431480
I'll leave the rest of feedback comments tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#discussion_r55849588
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2014,8 +2014,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
} catch {
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195429708
I can't see the earlier version of this diff, but I dont' understand why
you'd need to introduce a `SparkEnv`. I see that currently, when a `WebUI` is
created, you no l
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8885#issuecomment-195428838
@lianhuiwang #10648 has already merged and I think it includes features
proposed in this PR. So, do you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10480#issuecomment-195425756
Sorry for the delay @felixcheung -- I'll get back on this today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195407370
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195407372
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195406759
**[Test build #52925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52925/consoleFull)**
for PR 11657 at commit
[`8e2865e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195397133
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195397138
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195396694
**[Test build #52924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52924/consoleFull)**
for PR 11657 at commit
[`1deecd8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-195396390
**[Test build #52926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52926/consoleFull)**
for PR 11658 at commit
[`198b406`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-195396204
cc @liancheng @gatorsmile @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
401 - 500 of 606 matches
Mail list logo
