Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8885#issuecomment-195911630
@sarutak Yes, I will close this PR. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user lianhuiwang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8885
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-195911883
**[Test build #53022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53022/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
[`460ef0d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-195911928
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-195911930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195911950
**[Test build #53024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53024/consoleFull)**
for PR 11580 at commit
[`c1e4e41`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195911951
**[Test build #53023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53023/consoleFull)**
for PR 11672 at commit
[`563614f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195913335
**[Test build #53025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53025/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`1e417d2`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195913912
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195913913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195913903
**[Test build #53023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53023/consoleFull)**
for PR 11672 at commit
[`563614f`](https://g
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684
[SPARK-13844][SQL] Generate better code for filters with a non-nullable
column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR simplifies generated code with a non-nullable colum
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-195915534
**[Test build #53026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53026/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`b005e7b`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#discussion_r55934217
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -54,8 +55,26 @@ class SQLBuilder(logicalPlan: LogicalPlan, sqlContext:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#discussion_r55934643
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -144,7 +143,7 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
"org.spark-project" %% "genjavadoc-plugin" %
unidoc
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r55934654
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -66,7 +67,10 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
_executorDes
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925765
This is OK for 2.x of course, and 1.6.x too I think. It's just a bug
release, and the 2.11 build is the secondary one for 1.6 anyway, so slightly
lower risk in any even
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925741
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195925790
@squito some progress on a few of the suggestions (not all for sure).
Wrapping the generic compute function sounds like a good idea I'll do that next
(will still need t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925848
**[Test build #53027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53027/consoleFull)**
for PR 11681 at commit
[`5ae9816`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925993
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925990
**[Test build #53027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53027/consoleFull)**
for PR 11681 at commit
[`5ae9816`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-195925992
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195926080
**[Test build #53028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53028/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`96abcc1`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195926365
**[Test build #53029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53029/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`d02d842`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195928608
Merged to master and 1.6. I added 1.6 since it's just a tiny doc
improvement, and probably adds disproportionate value.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-195929790
**[Test build #53026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53026/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`b005e7b`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195930088
@mengxr @jkbradley was the intent that you just set the reg param on the
optimizer object? or do you agree this should be exposed as a setter? I am not
sure enough to kn
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-195930296
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-195930295
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#discussion_r55934983
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -144,7 +143,7 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
"org.spark-project" %% "genjavadoc-plugin" %
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#discussion_r55935019
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -241,7 +240,7 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
/* Enable shared settings on all projects */
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195931137
**[Test build #53024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53024/consoleFull)**
for PR 11580 at commit
[`c1e4e41`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195931184
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195931183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55935194
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -57,15 +58,15 @@ object CurrentOrigin {
def res
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55935199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -418,6 +419,13 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
TreeN
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195935665
Right, as you said, we can use optimizer object directly. I thought that's
the main reason why this PR doesn't get any response from ML part committers.
A
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195936375
**[Test build #53030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53030/consoleFull)**
for PR 11527 at commit
[`6b6a11f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195936814
**[Test build #53030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53030/consoleFull)**
for PR 11527 at commit
[`6b6a11f`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195936823
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195936821
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195937964
**[Test build #53031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53031/consoleFull)**
for PR 11527 at commit
[`f0deb4a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195939662
**[Test build #53029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53029/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`d02d842`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195939680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195939681
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55935798
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -442,25 +442,25 @@ class CleanerTester(
checkpointIds: Seq[Long] = Seq
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55935805
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -578,18 +578,27 @@ class CleanerTester(
}
private def uncle
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55935840
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -133,23 +136,30 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
// Start a thr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195940118
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195940119
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195940102
**[Test build #53028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53028/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`96abcc1`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11628#discussion_r55936088
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -157,8 +167,16 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
val lines = Sou
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195948506
**[Test build #53025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53025/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`1e417d2`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195948563
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-195948561
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user bbossy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272#issuecomment-195952284
I tested the rebased version manually. It is still working after the rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195958030
**[Test build #53031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53031/consoleFull)**
for PR 11527 at commit
[`f0deb4a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195958300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11527#issuecomment-195958303
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-195961900
**[Test build #53032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53032/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
[`d892584`](https://gi
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55937825
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -57,15 +58,15 @@ object CurrentOrigin {
def reset
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685
[SPARK-13847][SQL] Defer the variable evaluation for Limit codegen
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13847
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We can defe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685#issuecomment-195967255
**[Test build #53033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53033/consoleFull)**
for PR 11685 at commit
[`ff54eb5`](https://gi
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685#issuecomment-195971503
This is not correct. Close it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-195978548
**[Test build #53032 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53032/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
[`d892584`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-195979011
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-195979015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195979339
**[Test build #53034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53034/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`e9f37bc`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685#issuecomment-195989643
**[Test build #53033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53033/consoleFull)**
for PR 11685 at commit
[`ff54eb5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685#issuecomment-195989734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11685#issuecomment-195989733
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-196011806
**[Test build #53034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53034/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`e9f37bc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-196011924
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-196011925
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user wilson8 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#discussion_r55941313
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -578,18 +578,27 @@ class CleanerTester(
}
private
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-196016180
**[Test build #53035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53035/consoleFull)**
for PR 11580 at commit
[`bb8b83a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10839#issuecomment-196016183
**[Test build #53036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53036/consoleFull)**
for PR 10839 at commit
[`67fd902`](https://gi
Github user radekg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#issuecomment-196016688
@tnachen Keeping up with the pace of changes to Spark code was a bit too
much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user jackylk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686
fix typo in DataSourceRegister
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix typo in DataSourceRegister
## How was this patch tested?
found when going throu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686#issuecomment-196017946
**[Test build #53037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53037/consoleFull)**
for PR 11686 at commit
[`22ec56b`](https://gi
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55941719
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -418,6 +419,13 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
TreeNod
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686#issuecomment-196022000
OK. Have you checked to see if there are any other similar typos to correct
while you're at it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10839#issuecomment-196022345
**[Test build #53036 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53036/consoleFull)**
for PR 10839 at commit
[`67fd902`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10839#issuecomment-196022449
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10839#issuecomment-196022452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#issuecomment-196043144
Hi, @JoshRosen .
If it's possible, could you review this PR, too? This supersedes #11661 .
This is a build PR, so I think we need more careful review.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686#issuecomment-196046142
**[Test build #53037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53037/consoleFull)**
for PR 11686 at commit
[`22ec56b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686#issuecomment-196046227
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11686#issuecomment-196046228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-196050740
**[Test build #53035 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53035/consoleFull)**
for PR 11580 at commit
[`bb8b83a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-196051051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-196051048
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11652#issuecomment-196056344
Thanks @sun-rui -- LGTM. Merging this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11652
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687
[SPARK-13848][SPARK-5185] Update to Py4J 0.9.2 in order to fix classloading
issue
This patch upgrades Py4J from 0.9.1 to 0.9.2 in order to include a patch
which modifies Py4J to use the current
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196059153
**[Test build #53038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53038/consoleFull)**
for PR 11687 at commit
[`40d22cc`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196060096
I suppose we could also backport this change to Spark 1.6.x if there's
interest, but for now I'm mostly concerned with fixing this in 2.0.0 because I
believe that the
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
