Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201618929
**[Test build #54231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54231/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`8f20e5a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201618700
**[Test build #54230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54230/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`d837c32`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-201618575
cc @yhuai
I took a quick look and it looks good -- but I didn't look at the details.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201618010
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201618009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201617689
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201617522
**[Test build #54223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54223/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201617490
Looks pretty good actually. There are some details about naming and on/off
defaults we need to figure out, but that can go in later.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973#issuecomment-201614723
Argh the rendering looks horrible, I'll have to find a better way...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973#issuecomment-201613623
**[Test build #54240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54240/consoleFull)**
for PR 11973 at commit
[`29023d7`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973#issuecomment-201612561
Github doesn't actually show the modified template, so I'll have to
manually test things locally some other way... (I tested "fake merging"
existing PRs and that's worki
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973
[SPARK-14170] [infra] Simplify the PR template and remove it when merging.
This change modifies the template so that all instructions are together at
the top, which makes it easy to remove the te
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201611512
**[Test build #2696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2696/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`d837c32`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201607130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201607135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201606853
**[Test build #54237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54237/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
[`2800492`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969#issuecomment-201606179
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969#issuecomment-201606181
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969#issuecomment-201605730
**[Test build #54226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54226/consoleFull)**
for PR 11969 at commit
[`6a46ddb`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-201604420
**[Test build #2695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2695/consoleFull)**
for PR 11955 at commit
[`57b094e`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201604174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201604171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-201604050
LGTM but I wonder if just overriding `Thread.run` and making it final
wouldn't be enough (the task to run would have to be passed as a `Runnable`).
It would simplify the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201603534
**[Test build #54221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54221/consoleFull)**
for PR 11968 at commit
[`e11482a`](https://g
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201602370
I think the Since tags will be included. Even though the mix-ins are
private, the members are not. (When I generate the current docs, they show up.
Does the proper
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-201601826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-201601820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-201601324
**[Test build #54238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54238/consoleFull)**
for PR 11972 at commit
[`238d392`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201601318
**[Test build #54239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54239/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`4d9489a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-201601013
**[Test build #54228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54228/consoleFull)**
for PR 11792 at commit
[`8f5dfc9`](https://g
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972
[SPARK-14013][SQL] Proper temp function support in catalog
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Session catalog was added in #11750. However, it doesn't really support
te
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-201599623
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-201599620
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-201599098
**[Test build #54224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54224/consoleFull)**
for PR 11570 at commit
[`42a9419`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201598594
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201598597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11968#issuecomment-201597966
**[Test build #54217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54217/consoleFull)**
for PR 11968 at commit
[`534b202`](https://g
Github user olarayej commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201597000
@felixcheung I just added support for Columns or characters.
In my opinion, histogram() is column function and when we sort out #11336,
it wouldn't have to ta
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-201596033
**[Test build #54235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54235/consoleFull)**
for PR 11971 at commit
[`8a65a9d`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11970#issuecomment-201596034
**[Test build #54236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54236/consoleFull)**
for PR 11970 at commit
[`2163647`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201596039
**[Test build #54237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54237/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
[`2800492`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201594759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201594744
**[Test build #54234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54234/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
[`19f995c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201594755
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971
[SPARK-14169][Core]Add UninterruptibleThread
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extract the workaround for HADOOP-10622 introduced by #11940 into
UninterruptibleThread so
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11970
[SPARK-13955] [yarn] Also look for Spark jars in the build directory.
Move the logic to find Spark jars to CommandBuilderUtils and make it
available for YARN code, so that it's possible to easily
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-201593441
**[Test build #54234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54234/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
[`19f995c`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201591981
Finally passed. Ping @rxin to take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201591152
**[Test build #2697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2697/consoleFull)**
for PR 11870 at commit
[`e76006d`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201590288
**[Test build #54233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54233/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`dd0d82b`](https://gi
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201589402
Alright I am merging this to master. Thanks @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-201587897
**[Test build #54232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54232/consoleFull)**
for PR 11960 at commit
[`dd6cef3`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201586342
/cc @andrewor14, @nongli, @rxin, can you glance over the PR description to
check whether the user-facing semantics are okay for now? We might want to
change some bits
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57502420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201585959
/cc @andrewor14 @nongli @rxin, could one of you review this to unblock the
off-heap patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-201582826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-201582825
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-201582376
**[Test build #54229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54229/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`f8b7823`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201581718
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201581722
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201581142
**[Test build #54214 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54214/consoleFull)**
for PR 11895 at commit
[`f5d5976`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201580047
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201579941
**[Test build #54204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54204/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201580051
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#discussion_r57501700
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ case class CreateDatabase(
props: Map[S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201572014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201572018
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201571487
**[Test build #54219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54219/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`b9e57b6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569812
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569358
**[Test build #54215 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54215/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`334b727`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11965
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11965#issuecomment-201568940
LGTM. Merged into master. I left the JIRA open for 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#discussion_r57500173
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ case class CreateDatabase(
props: Map[String
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-201565428
@jkbradley OK for another look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201564989
**[Test build #54231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54231/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`8f20e5a`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201564041
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201562753
**[Test build #54230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54230/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`d837c32`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201561829
**[Test build #2696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2696/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`d837c32`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-201561221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11967#issuecomment-201561249
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-201561225
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11967#issuecomment-201561253
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11967#issuecomment-201560846
**[Test build #54216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54216/consoleFull)**
for PR 11967 at commit
[`834ee69`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-201560886
**[Test build #54225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54225/consoleFull)**
for PR 9971 at commit
[`2666913`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-201560326
**[Test build #54229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54229/consoleFull)**
for PR 10355 at commit
[`f8b7823`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201558328
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201558323
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201557672
**[Test build #54199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54199/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`8f20e5a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201551954
**[Test build #54227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54227/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`01d9f0d`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201551046
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969#issuecomment-201553654
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-201553360
**[Test build #2695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2695/consoleFull)**
for PR 11955 at commit
[`57b094e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-201551994
**[Test build #54228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54228/consoleFull)**
for PR 11792 at commit
[`8f5dfc9`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969#issuecomment-201551963
**[Test build #54226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54226/consoleFull)**
for PR 11969 at commit
[`6a46ddb`](https://gi
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11969
[SPARK-14168] Warn instead of Error on Managed Memory leak detection.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The leak detection can be misleading, either when an iterator is not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11278#issuecomment-201545515
This is going to be outdated soon, since there's ongoing effort to remove
the need to build assemblies before running tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11966#issuecomment-201545381
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11966#issuecomment-201545378
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
101 - 200 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
