Github user oliverpierson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#discussion_r57450030
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,21 @@ private[feature] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201318151
**[Test build #54177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54177/consoleFull)**
for PR 11959 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959
[SPARK-14157][SQL] Parse Drop Function DDL command
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14157
We only parse create
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201317447
cc @yhuai @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201303418
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11938#discussion_r57447378
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -31,17 +32,34 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201303428
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r57447363
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201302532
**[Test build #54168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54168/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201300143
@marmbrus Unfortunately our current strategy for generating Spark
partitions doesn't play well with ORC version of `buildReader()`, or to be more
specific,
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r57446993
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201298335
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201298344
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201297711
**[Test build #54172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54172/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#issuecomment-201295618
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#issuecomment-201295622
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#issuecomment-201295326
**[Test build #54171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54171/consoleFull)**
for PR 11879 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201294640
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201294644
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201293980
**[Test build #54170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54170/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-201291268
**[Test build #54176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54176/consoleFull)**
for PR 11829 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#issuecomment-201289533
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r57445207
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201272688
**[Test build #54175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54175/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11937#issuecomment-201271357
Yeah it's not flaky now because it's disabled. Although this was a good
guess at the fix and passed locally and in the PR builder, it looks like
there's a substantial
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954#discussion_r57441797
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KolmogorovSmirnovTest.scala
---
@@ -64,11 +64,10 @@ private[stat] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201268988
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201268984
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201268947
**[Test build #54173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54173/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201268566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201268515
**[Test build #54163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54163/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201268564
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11898#issuecomment-201267925
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-201267879
**[Test build #54162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54162/consoleFull)**
for PR 11955 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-201267983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-201267985
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-201267646
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-201267649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-201267629
**[Test build #54174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54174/consoleFull)**
for PR 11681 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-201266846
**[Test build #54174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54174/consoleFull)**
for PR 11681 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57441109
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201266851
**[Test build #54173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54173/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11646#discussion_r57441074
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11681#issuecomment-201266637
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201266418
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201266445
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201265889
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57440620
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -81,10 +81,10 @@ private[sql] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57440291
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -81,10 +81,10 @@ private[sql] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201262390
**[Test build #54172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54172/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11931
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201259009
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#issuecomment-201257317
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#issuecomment-201255562
**[Test build #54171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54171/consoleFull)**
for PR 11879 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#discussion_r57439284
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -134,6 +134,46 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201250187
**[Test build #54170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54170/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201248180
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#discussion_r57437793
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879#discussion_r57437251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -134,6 +134,46 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201243933
**[Test build #54169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54169/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201243936
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201243935
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201243792
**[Test build #54169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54169/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11931#issuecomment-201243757
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11926#issuecomment-201237698
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11926#issuecomment-201237534
**[Test build #54164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54164/consoleFull)**
for PR 11926 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11926#issuecomment-201237697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201236251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201236250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201236054
**[Test build #54167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54167/consoleFull)**
for PR 11957 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201236007
Looks like it's a legitimate failure, @marmbrus do you any idea why file
source stress test timeout?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201228026
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201228023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201227889
**[Test build #54152 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54152/consoleFull)**
for PR 11934 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201227185
**[Test build #54168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54168/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958#issuecomment-201223799
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958#issuecomment-201223798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958#issuecomment-201223701
**[Test build #54166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54166/consoleFull)**
for PR 11958 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201223202
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201223201
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201223167
**[Test build #54148 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54148/consoleFull)**
for PR 11870 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11793#issuecomment-201221005
@NarineK This looks good to me. But I think we should wait the discussion
of SPARK-14147, I vote that it should not output feature column in SparkR.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201215454
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201215371
**[Test build #54165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54165/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201215461
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201212757
**[Test build #54167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54167/consoleFull)**
for PR 11957 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958#issuecomment-201212737
**[Test build #54166 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54166/consoleFull)**
for PR 11958 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958
[SPARK-14147] [ML] [SparkR] SparkR predict should not output feature column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkR predict should not output feature column.
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957
[SPARK-14156][SQL] Use executedPlan in HiveComparisonTest for the messages
of computed tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JIRA:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201211654
**[Test build #54165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54165/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
[SPARK-14098][SQL][WIP] Generate Java code that gets a value in each column
of CachedBatch when DataFrame.cache() is called
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11828#issuecomment-201209754
**[Test build #2694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2694/consoleFull)**
for PR 11828 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11926#issuecomment-201208256
**[Test build #54164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54164/consoleFull)**
for PR 11926 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954#issuecomment-201206793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954#issuecomment-201206798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950#issuecomment-201206266
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11954#issuecomment-201206277
**[Test build #54161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54161/consoleFull)**
for PR 11954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950#issuecomment-201206270
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950#issuecomment-201205236
**[Test build #54160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54160/consoleFull)**
for PR 11950 at commit
501 - 600 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
