Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002406
**[Test build #2699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2699/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`df6a3da`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002397
**[Test build #54280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54280/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`df6a3da`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002399
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002398
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002051
**[Test build #2699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2699/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`df6a3da`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-202002019
**[Test build #54278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54278/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
[`ef1be44`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-202002015
**[Test build #54280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54280/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`df6a3da`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-202002017
**[Test build #54281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54281/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`2eda22f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-202002007
**[Test build #54277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54277/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`60f6719`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-202002010
**[Test build #54279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54279/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`60f6719`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11985#issuecomment-202002009
**[Test build #54282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54282/consoleFull)**
for PR 11985 at commit
[`16e967e`](https://gi
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11985#issuecomment-202000719
test it please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-202000712
@jkbradley @wangmiao1981 From another perspective, this annotation should
not get inherited to classes which are added in later Spark versions. So I
think it's bette
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11985
[SPARK-14181] TrainValidationSplit should have HasSeed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14181
TrainValidationSplit should have HasSeed for the random split of RDD. I
also chang
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201993844
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201992876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201992875
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201992845
**[Test build #54273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54273/consoleFull)**
for PR 11870 at commit
[`11b2364`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201991966
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201991965
**[Test build #54276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54276/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`e56406e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201991969
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201991876
**[Test build #54276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54276/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`e56406e`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-201991658
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-201991655
**[Test build #54275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54275/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`9fd7773`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-201991657
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-201991629
**[Test build #54275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54275/consoleFull)**
for PR 11684 at commit
[`9fd7773`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#discussion_r57523346
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveComparisonTest.scala
---
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ abstract class HiveComparisonTest
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#discussion_r57523270
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveComparisonTest.scala
---
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ abstract class HiveComparisonTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201989670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201989658
**[Test build #54274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54274/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`fea2a52`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201989665
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984#issuecomment-201988732
**[Test build #54274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54274/consoleFull)**
for PR 11984 at commit
[`fea2a52`](https://gi
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11984
[Spark-14138][SQL] Fix generated SpecificColumnarIterator code can exceed
JVM size limit for cached DataFrames
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reduces Java byte c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984028
**[Test build #54272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`df8be62`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201982155
@yhuai I added it to PR description. Please let me know if it is clear now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201981360
Can you attach an example showing the message before and the message after
the change? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-201980413
**[Test build #54273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54273/consoleFull)**
for PR 11870 at commit
[`11b2364`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-201979883
cc @yhuai @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201979696
I have fixed the conflict.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201979613
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201979487
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user flyjy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-201971518
@MLnick This bug has been fixed without changing existing interfaces. Have
tested it with your test script with Lee corpus from Gensim.
I am not sure whether you
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201971431
ping @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201971414
**[Test build #54272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
[`df8be62`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201970947
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201970946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201970903
**[Test build #54271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54271/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`bf14a24`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201970906
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201970905
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201970895
**[Test build #54268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54268/consoleFull)**
for PR 11959 at commit
[`db23480`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201968589
**[Test build #54271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54271/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`bf14a24`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201967263
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201967255
**[Test build #54270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54270/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`aa4b408`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201967262
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201966705
**[Test build #54270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54270/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`aa4b408`](https://gi
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201966523
@liancheng : I have made all requested changes as per review and also
rebased. Can you please take a look ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201964442
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201964443
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201964439
**[Test build #54269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54269/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`bc06166`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201964119
**[Test build #54269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54269/consoleFull)**
for PR 11983 at commit
[`bc06166`](https://gi
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983#issuecomment-201963929
CC: @mengxr Here's the prototype
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11983
[SPARK-14100][ML] Merging Estimator and Model: prototype for StringIndexer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a *prototype*. It will be used to decide whether or
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57521413
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-201960142
Yes, my suggestion would make the whole thread uninterruptible. But from
the only use case, it seems that would be ok - there are no calls I see that
can be interrupted
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201959124
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201959127
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201958767
**[Test build #54267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54267/consoleFull)**
for PR 11891 at commit
[`3c25e7e`](https://g
Github user mtustin-handy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982#discussion_r57521152
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
Github user yongtang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#discussion_r57521139
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
confi
Github user yongtang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#discussion_r57521128
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
confi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201952198
**[Test build #54268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54268/consoleFull)**
for PR 11959 at commit
[`db23480`](https://gi
Github user mtustin-handy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982#discussion_r57521048
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982#discussion_r57521027
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
confide
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982#issuecomment-201951571
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user marcintustin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#issuecomment-201951574
FYI I have a more parsimonious change here: #11982
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user mtustin-handy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982
[SPARK-14163][CORE] SumEvaluator and countApprox cannot reliably handle
RDDs of size 1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This special cases 0 and 1 counts to avoid
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#discussion_r57520944
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
confide
Github user marcintustin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#discussion_r57520937
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/SumEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[spark] class SumEvaluator(totalOutputs: Int,
c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981#issuecomment-201949785
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201949680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201949678
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user yongtang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11981
[SPARK-14163][CORE] SumEvaluator and countApprox cannot reliably handle
RDDs of size 1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fix fixes issues in SPARK-14163 where SumE
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201949626
**[Test build #54266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54266/consoleFull)**
for PR 11977 at commit
[`6517f1f`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201948284
Thanks. I am merging this to master.
@liancheng @cloud-fan Let's address
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936/files#r57520723 in either of your PR
for oth
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57520723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -56,9 +55,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201947768
@jkbradley I am not sure whether the property tag will change the
appearance of the members in the doc. I can do a quick check by roll-back the
change to check whe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201945963
**[Test build #54267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54267/consoleFull)**
for PR 11891 at commit
[`3c25e7e`](https://gi
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11891#issuecomment-201945359
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-201943853
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-201943850
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-201943320
**[Test build #54265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54265/consoleFull)**
for PR 11980 at commit
[`3e32b6a`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-201941448
Overall looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#discussion_r57520314
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveUDFs.scala
---
@@ -141,6 +141,16 @@ private[hive] class HiveFunctionRegistry(
}
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#discussion_r57520291
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -476,33 +497,29 @@ class SessionCatalog(externalCatalo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11977#issuecomment-201936414
**[Test build #54266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54266/consoleFull)**
for PR 11977 at commit
[`6517f1f`](https://gi
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
