Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-202624401
**[Test build #2706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2706/consoleFull)**
for PR 11792 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-202624330
LGTM, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-202624172
**[Test build #54379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54379/consoleFull)**
for PR 11570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12017#issuecomment-202624157
**[Test build #54378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54378/consoleFull)**
for PR 12017 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202624063
OK thanks, I'm merging this to unblock progress on other issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202624013
LGTM except one nit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57651085
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -145,15 +146,15 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-202624040
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12006#issuecomment-202623706
Thanks merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user nongli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12017
[SPARK-14217][SQL] Fix bug if parquet data has columns that use dictionary
encoding for some of the data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, this causes batches
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57650888
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ abstract class OutputWriter {
*
*
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11570#issuecomment-202623532
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202623370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202623368
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202623429
LGTM merging into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202623274
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-202623315
I'm gonna close this for now since #11796 is passing without this patch...
no idea how.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202623175
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202623176
Merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202623179
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202623270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202623146
**[Test build #54357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54357/consoleFull)**
for PR 12012 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202623018
**[Test build #54362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54362/consoleFull)**
for PR 11972 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202622829
**[Test build #54358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54358/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202622765
LGTM pretty straightforward
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005#issuecomment-202621204
**[Test build #54377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54377/consoleFull)**
for PR 12005 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#discussion_r57649905
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -94,15 +94,14 @@ private[state]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202620050
**[Test build #2704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2704/consoleFull)**
for PR 12011 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202619872
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202619869
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202619573
**[Test build #54361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54361/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-202619019
**[Test build #54375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54375/consoleFull)**
for PR 11978 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202618988
**[Test build #54376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54376/consoleFull)**
for PR 11976 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-202617742
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202617628
**[Test build #2705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2705/consoleFull)**
for PR 12014 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57648372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -369,13 +369,33 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12010#issuecomment-202617177
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12010#issuecomment-202617173
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202617101
**[Test build #2703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2703/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12010#issuecomment-202616883
**[Test build #54356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54356/consoleFull)**
for PR 12010 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202616817
Discovered a potentially major problem: if we bail out of a getOrElseUpdate
call and don't end up caching a block and then do not fully consume or dispose
of the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12016#issuecomment-202616434
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mtustin-handy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12016
[SPARK-14163][CORE] SumEvaluator and countApprox cannot reliably handle
RDDs of size 1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This special cases 0 and 1 counts to avoid
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202614420
> Can you write a regression test? This bug wasn't caught by existing tests.
I tried. But it's really hard to write such test. E.g., even if this dead
lock
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202613948
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202613879
**[Test build #54374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54374/consoleFull)**
for PR 12012 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202613953
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#discussion_r57646611
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57646589
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -369,13 +369,33 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202613345
**[Test build #54368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54368/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user mtustin-handy closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mtustin-handy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11982#issuecomment-202611779
@rxin @srowen Looks like github is not showing the correct diff any more.
I'm going to close this, reopen and tag you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005#issuecomment-202611123
**[Test build #54337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54337/consoleFull)**
for PR 12005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005#issuecomment-202611143
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202611071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202611076
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005#issuecomment-202611140
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202611059
**[Test build #54373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54373/consoleFull)**
for PR 11991 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202610478
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202610482
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-202605688
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202609279
**[Test build #54359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54359/consoleFull)**
for PR 12011 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11955#issuecomment-202609629
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202605622
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-202608988
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#discussion_r57644828
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -369,13 +369,33 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202607728
**[Test build #54373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54373/consoleFull)**
for PR 11991 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11991#issuecomment-202605966
FYI this blocks on #12009.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-202605115
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-202605684
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-202605002
**[Test build #54350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54350/consoleFull)**
for PR 11948 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-202604607
**[Test build #54351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54351/consoleFull)**
for PR 11870 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-202605114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-202603261
This looks to be in very good shape. My main comment is about unit test
time: the tests take a significant amount of time. Wherever it is easy to do,
could you set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#issuecomment-202603096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#issuecomment-202603097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202602915
**[Test build #54372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54372/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#issuecomment-202602824
**[Test build #54353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54353/consoleFull)**
for PR 11326 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#discussion_r57643358
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -17,14 +17,116 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.util
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#discussion_r57643353
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/SchemaUtils.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,20 @@ private[spark] object SchemaUtils {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202602213
**[Test build #54371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54371/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202602220
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202602224
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202601899
**[Test build #54371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54371/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202601667
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202601669
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#issuecomment-202601642
@gatorsmile this looks pretty solid. Could you take a look at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011 and rebase against that? Let me know
if you need some
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202601623
**[Test build #54365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54365/consoleFull)**
for PR 12014 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#issuecomment-202601202
Looks great.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57642753
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -389,21 +415,61 @@ class DDLCommandSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57642548
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -106,17 +105,20 @@ case class DropFunction(
isTemp:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57642492
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -318,6 +320,138 @@ case class DescribeCommand(
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11987#discussion_r57642374
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -249,8 +249,9 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57642335
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@ class
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57642224
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@ class
Github user hvanhovell closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11905
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202598872
**[Test build #54370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54370/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202598875
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
301 - 400 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
