Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202598879
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202598783
@hvanhovell Corrected, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57641610
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2551,6 +2551,134 @@ object functions {
ToUTCTimestamp(ts.expr,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202598224
**[Test build #54369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54369/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202598235
**[Test build #54370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54370/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57641524
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1585,3 +1586,110 @@ object ResolveUpCast extends
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57641521
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -119,6 +119,31 @@ class GBTClassifierSuite extends
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57641388
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1585,3 +1587,106 @@ object ResolveUpCast extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202597998
@davies I think the JIRA number should be SPARK-14215:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14215
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57641113
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2551,6 +2551,134 @@ object functions {
ToUTCTimestamp(ts.expr,
Github user joan38 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11937
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57641072
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57641047
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog {
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11937#issuecomment-202596918
I've done some benchmark and the `Thread.sleep` I've added on
`SortShuffleManager.getBlockData` actually doesn't affect the `fetchWaitTime`.
So this change is actually
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202596515
**[Test build #54368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54368/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12015#issuecomment-202596509
**[Test build #54367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54367/consoleFull)**
for PR 12015 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#discussion_r57640662
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -148,7 +146,7 @@ private[state]
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202596086
Not sure about what this mima test failure is about. Thats anyways not on
the latest commit, so I will wait for the tests on the latest commit to
completed (build #
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202596152
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202595572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12015
[SPARK-14213][SQL] Migrate HiveQl parsing to ANTLR4 parser [WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR migrates all HiveQl parsing to the new ANTLR4 parser. This
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202595570
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202595487
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202595483
**[Test build #54366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54366/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202595489
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10910#issuecomment-202595450
@sarutak @JoshRosen @tgravescs I know you guys are busy getting ready for
Spark Summit West, but I was wondering if you had an eta on looking at this?
It's been open
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202595164
**[Test build #54366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54366/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202595263
**[Test build #54354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54354/consoleFull)**
for PR 12011 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202595170
**[Test build #54365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54365/consoleFull)**
for PR 12014 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202594918
LGTM, merging this into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57639931
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -222,19 +222,15 @@ final class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-202594278
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-202594271
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-202593845
**[Test build #54363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54363/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-202593045
**[Test build #2702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2702/consoleFull)**
for PR 11792 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57639140
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-202592262
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-202592264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12009#discussion_r57638935
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9229#issuecomment-202591981
**[Test build #54347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54347/consoleFull)**
for PR 9229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202591242
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202591236
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202590961
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202590941
**[Test build #54364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54364/consoleFull)**
for PR 12014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202590957
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202590657
**[Test build #54340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54340/consoleFull)**
for PR 12007 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202589968
**[Test build #54364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54364/consoleFull)**
for PR 12014 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014#issuecomment-202589529
cc @marmbrus @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57637956
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2551,6 +2551,134 @@ object functions {
ToUTCTimestamp(ts.expr,
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12014
[SPARK-14125] [SQL] [PYSPARK] Support chained Python UDFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example
```sql
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202588966
**[Test build #2704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2704/consoleFull)**
for PR 12011 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202588406
**[Test build #54362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54362/consoleFull)**
for PR 11972 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-202588404
**[Test build #54363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54363/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#discussion_r57637476
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202588000
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user koertkuipers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11980#issuecomment-202588020
@cloud-fan i tried to do that, but i don't think i am familiar enough with
the code gen, because it breaks other unit tests. it seems to me i am messing
up with
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202587819
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#discussion_r57636219
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -655,6 +656,20 @@ def test_nested_pipeline_persistence(self):
except OSError:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#discussion_r57635750
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -78,6 +79,26 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df: DataFrame) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202584230
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202584233
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202584199
**[Test build #54360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54360/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202583814
**[Test build #2703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2703/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#discussion_r57634979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDD.scala
---
@@ -54,17 +54,10 @@ class StateStoreRDD[T: ClassTag,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202582689
**[Test build #54361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54361/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202582432
@marmbrus @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12006#issuecomment-202582382
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12006#issuecomment-202582387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11475#issuecomment-202582042
Merging to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12006#issuecomment-202581969
**[Test build #54339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54339/consoleFull)**
for PR 12006 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013#issuecomment-202581397
**[Test build #54360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54360/consoleFull)**
for PR 12013 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-202580695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-202580691
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12013
[SPARK-14214][SQL] Update state to provide get/put interface
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The goal is to make the state store more flexible by giving it a more
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-202580413
**[Test build #54355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54355/consoleFull)**
for PR 9971 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10355#issuecomment-202579805
I'll take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12011#issuecomment-202579716
**[Test build #54359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54359/consoleFull)**
for PR 12011 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202579350
Can you write a regression test? This bug wasn't caught by existing tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202578966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202578969
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202578629
**[Test build #54346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54346/consoleFull)**
for PR 12007 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#discussion_r57632568
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202578291
**[Test build #54358 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54358/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012#issuecomment-202578252
**[Test build #54357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54357/consoleFull)**
for PR 12012 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202578081
Hmm, now tests pass without the fix for SPARK-14134... retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202577939
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#discussion_r57632372
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -655,6 +656,20 @@ def test_nested_pipeline_persistence(self):
except OSError:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202577942
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12012
[SPARK-14180][Core]Fix a deadlock in CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend Shutdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Call `executor.stop` in a new thread to eliminate deadlock.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202577546
**[Test build #54345 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54345/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202577054
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202577049
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12010
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202576475
**[Test build #54336 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54336/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-202575599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-202575596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12010#issuecomment-202575287
Compilation looks good
(https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54356/consoleFull).
I am merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-202575103
**[Test build #54335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54335/consoleFull)**
for PR 11971 at commit
401 - 500 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
