Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57617336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/TimeWindow.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973#issuecomment-202536302
As I said, just read the contributing.md file in, for each line that is not
heading, remove the line from the pr description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#discussion_r57617310
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/TimeWindow.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202535639
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202535636
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202535622
**[Test build #54344 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54344/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202535163
```
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala:31:
object Queryable is not a member of
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202534895
**[Test build #54344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54344/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user burakkose commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871#issuecomment-202534323
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#issuecomment-202531601
**[Test build #54341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54341/consoleFull)**
for PR 11972 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202533309
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202533304
**[Test build #54343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54343/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202533314
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008#issuecomment-202533134
**[Test build #54343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54343/consoleFull)**
for PR 12008 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008
[SPARK-14160] Time Windowing functions for DataSets
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the function `window` as a column expression.
`window` can be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202532927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202532926
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202532343
**[Test build #54329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54329/consoleFull)**
for PR 11976 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-202527512
**[Test build #54338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54338/consoleFull)**
for PR 11948 at commit
GitHub user nongli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007
[SPARK-14210][SQL] Add a metric for time spent in scans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds a metric to parquet scans that measures the time in just the scan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202531559
**[Test build #54340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54340/consoleFull)**
for PR 12007 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-202531604
**[Test build #54342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54342/consoleFull)**
for PR 11792 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10991#issuecomment-202530245
There's a more fundamental issue which the history server has too: log
replay is too expensive for long-lived applications. replay time is
O(jobs)+O(stages),
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12007#issuecomment-202529228
Here's a screenshot of what this looks like.
**
for PR 12006 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11972#discussion_r57614602
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -476,33 +497,29 @@ class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r57614456
--- Diff: cloud/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12006
[SPARK-13923][SPARK-14014][SQL] Session catalog follow-ups
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch addresses the remaining comments left in #11750 and #11918
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-202526659
OK, @yhuai PTAL
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r57613179
--- Diff: cloud/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202525548
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202525551
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202525379
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202525383
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202525074
**[Test build #54326 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54326/consoleFull)**
for PR 12002 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202525173
**[Test build #54334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54334/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9971#issuecomment-202524310
@yinxusen Thanks for the update. It looks good, but there was one missed
item + a few more I found. I'm going to send a PR to update this PR.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202523636
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202523631
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202523512
**[Test build #54331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54331/consoleFull)**
for PR 12001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005#issuecomment-202519885
**[Test build #54337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54337/consoleFull)**
for PR 12005 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12005
[DO_NOT_MERGE]Try to reproduce StateStoreRDDSuite failure
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-202518284
Thank you, @srowen !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202517998
**[Test build #54336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54336/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#issuecomment-202517351
Note that as this patch is is playing with the maven build and the
hadoop-2.6 and hadoop-2.7 profiles, the SparkQA builds aren't going to pick up
on much here.
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202517146
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#issuecomment-202516301
**[Test build #54335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54335/consoleFull)**
for PR 11971 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#issuecomment-202515698
Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#discussion_r57609134
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -979,6 +979,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#discussion_r57608918
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -317,12 +317,11 @@ private[orc] case class OrcTableScan(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11978#discussion_r57608860
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -317,12 +317,11 @@ private[orc] case class OrcTableScan(
Github user viktortnk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7652#issuecomment-202514092
@jkbradley @badriub Any updates on this issue?
From diff I see that `rawPrediction` has `Double` type. Should it return an
Array of values from each binary
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202513741
Hmm that's not the test I was expecting to fail. And the error looks very
suspicious, as if there's something wrong with that test. Will take a look.
retest this pleas
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202512059
**[Test build #54328 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54328/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202512080
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202512086
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11870#issuecomment-202511033
@sameeragarwal PING
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-202510375
**[Test build #54334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54334/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57606190
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/GradientBoostedTrees.scala
---
@@ -274,4 +276,24 @@ private[ml] object GradientBoostedTrees
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#issuecomment-202509973
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#issuecomment-202509972
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#issuecomment-202509442
**[Test build #54324 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54324/consoleFull)**
for PR 11999 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#discussion_r57605732
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -110,39 +114,81 @@ case class Filter(condition: Expression,
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#issuecomment-202509546
LGTM, just two minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57605613
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -240,6 +240,17 @@ final class GBTClassificationModel
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57605639
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -222,16 +222,10 @@ final class
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57605486
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#issuecomment-202508415
**[Test build #54333 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54333/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
GitHub user steveloughran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
[SPARK-7481][build][WIP] Add Hadoop 2.6+ profile to pull in object store FS
accesors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-7481] Add Hadoop 2.6+ profile to pull
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11792#discussion_r57605200
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -110,39 +114,81 @@ case class Filter(condition: Expression,
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#discussion_r57605206
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
case None =>
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11995#discussion_r57605112
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -518,8 +543,8 @@ private[sql] object Expand
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-202505765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-202505761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11475#issuecomment-202505573
@ashangit sorry for the delay, just one minor comment otherwise looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11475#discussion_r57604294
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -191,12 +192,12 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-202504866
**[Test build #54323 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54323/consoleFull)**
for PR 11960 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-202503698
**[Test build #54332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54332/consoleFull)**
for PR 11941 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57603613
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57603199
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57603003
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11957#issuecomment-202502268
Thanks. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user falaki commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11947#issuecomment-202502231
ping @HyukjinKwon and @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57602697
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ private[json] trait TestJsonData {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57602452
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202500628
**[Test build #54330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54330/consoleFull)**
for PR 12002 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57602134
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ private[json] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202500633
**[Test build #54331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54331/consoleFull)**
for PR 12001 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57601851
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ private[sql] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57601790
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11684#issuecomment-202500100
LGTM, merging into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57601601
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57601454
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ private[json] trait TestJsonData {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57600051
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57601423
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202496292
(just want to test how this behaves without the shading fix)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12003#issuecomment-202499123
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202499223
**[Test build #54329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54329/consoleFull)**
for PR 11976 at commit
601 - 700 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
