Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11976#issuecomment-202498781
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12003#issuecomment-202499098
**[Test build #54327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54327/consoleFull)**
for PR 12003 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12003#issuecomment-202499118
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57600937
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-202497917
You also need to update the flume's log4j files as it's moved back now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11971#discussion_r57600647
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UninterruptibleThread.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57600622
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JSONRelation.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +122,39 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202496473
Aside from the above test I'm running, this should be ready for review.
@srowen @JoshRosen could you guys take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-202496381
**[Test build #54328 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54328/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57600394
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ private[json] trait
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57599911
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ private[json] trait
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202495324
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11973#issuecomment-202495377
@rxin do you mean you prefer the style where people replace portions of the
template with text?
I can see why some would prefer that, but it makes a little
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202495312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11958#issuecomment-202495150
Thanks, @yanboliang , this will solve the problem. It seems that the
changeset includes only naive bayes and survival analysis. Can we also do the
changes for kmeans
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202494895
**[Test build #54320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54320/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-202495049
@sun-rui This PR have some conflict that fail the build, so reverted it,
could you send another PR to fix that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12003#issuecomment-202494811
**[Test build #54327 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54327/consoleFull)**
for PR 12003 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57599706
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JSONRelation.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +122,39 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202494317
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-202494287
**[Test build #2701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2701/consoleFull)**
for PR 10947 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202494011
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57599100
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12003
[SPARK-14208][SQL] Renames spark.sql.parquet.fileScan
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Renames SQL option `spark.sql.parquet.fileScan` since now all
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-202492419
**[Test build #2701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2701/consoleFull)**
for PR 10947 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-202492245
LGTM, merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yongtang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11989#issuecomment-202487601
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57597324
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ private[sql] class
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57597120
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57597049
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202486518
LGTM (except the mima issue).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202485811
```
[error] * the type hierarchy of class org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset is
different in current version. Missing types
{org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Queryable}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202485017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202485020
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57596762
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +96,70 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202484686
**[Test build #54321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54321/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-202484431
Merging into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-202484151
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-202484260
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-202484262
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-202483946
**[Test build #54319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54319/consoleFull)**
for PR 11720 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#discussion_r57595999
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -549,15 +549,18 @@ class HDFSFileCatalog(
refresh()
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202483265
cc @marmbrus @yhuai @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57595668
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -113,8 +182,7 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57595515
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +96,70 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57595420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +96,70 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57595359
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +96,70 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202481762
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57595023
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/DefaultSource.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +96,70 @@ class DefaultSource extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202481765
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202481169
**[Test build #54318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54318/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57594757
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -49,14 +49,10 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#issuecomment-202480562
**[Test build #54326 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54326/consoleFull)**
for PR 12002 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57594679
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -137,8 +131,7 @@ private[sql] object
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002#discussion_r57594467
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -78,14 +79,6 @@ private[sql] object
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12002
[SPARK-14206][SQL] buildReader() implementation for CSV
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Major changes:
1. Implement `FileFormat.buildReader()` for the CSV
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202479528
**[Test build #54325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54325/consoleFull)**
for PR 12001 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202479590
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202479588
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202473862
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202473860
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202473941
**[Test build #54325 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54325/consoleFull)**
for PR 12001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202473716
**[Test build #54322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54322/consoleFull)**
for PR 11998 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001#issuecomment-202473165
cc @liancheng @rxin @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12001
[SPARK-14205][SQL] remove trait Queryable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After DataFrame and Dataset are merged, the trait `Queryable` becomes
unnecessary as it has
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-202472162
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user mchalek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
[SPARK-14204] [SQL] register driverClass rather than user class
This pull request fixes an issue in which cluster-mode executors fail to
properly register a JDBC driver when the driver is provided
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-202470953
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-202470945
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-202470303
**[Test build #54314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54314/consoleFull)**
for PR 11996 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11943#issuecomment-202466140
@davies @JoshRosen
Do you have any comment ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#issuecomment-202462960
**[Test build #54324 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54324/consoleFull)**
for PR 11999 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57589165
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -452,27 +451,15 @@ object SparkSubmit {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999#issuecomment-202461010
cc @marmbrus @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11999
[SPARK-14201][SQL] handle empty file for new data source strategy
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's possible that users will write empty files to data dir. For
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-202459534
**[Test build #54323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54323/consoleFull)**
for PR 11960 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8375#issuecomment-202458325
@saurfang This could be done easily with DataFrame APIs:
```
val df = rdd.map(t => Row(gen_key(t), t)).toDF("key", "text")
Github user JnyJny commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11943#issuecomment-202458241
I have tested this change on a host which does not support misaligned data
access with a conf/spark-defaults.conf configured to request off heap memory.
The host was
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998#issuecomment-202456589
**[Test build #54322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54322/consoleFull)**
for PR 11998 at commit
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11998
[SPARK-14202][PYTHON] Use generator expression instead of list comp in
python_full_outer_joâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces list comprehension in
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#discussion_r57586861
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
case None =>
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#discussion_r57586226
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
case None =>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11992
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11992#issuecomment-202442512
Merged into master, branch-1.6, and branch-1.5. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11997#issuecomment-202440622
I found we could't check a global sort of all partitions from
`SprakPlan#outputOrdering`, so I'll fix this soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11905#issuecomment-202437009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JnyJny commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11943#issuecomment-202439655
@tedyu Sorry, I haven't had the opportunity to test the change. I am hoping
to get that done today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11905#issuecomment-202436010
**[Test build #54312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54312/consoleFull)**
for PR 11905 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11905#issuecomment-202437003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#issuecomment-202434831
The basic idea is a good one, but in addition to needing to spend some time
sorting out the logic around that `assert`, I'm a little concerned about the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202434056
**[Test build #54321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54321/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#discussion_r57581958
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
case None =>
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11720#discussion_r57581491
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
case None =>
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11557#issuecomment-202429698
**[Test build #54320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54320/consoleFull)**
for PR 11557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202428846
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202428847
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202428748
**[Test build #54316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54316/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-202428180
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
701 - 800 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
