Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205685535
A few quick questions:
- [ ] Can we remove all of the Guava excludes now? They're all over the
place but it's not clear whether it's necessary anymore. If we
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205686155
**[Test build #54964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54964/consoleFull)**
for PR 12146 at commit
[`b7fac20`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205686151
**[Test build #54963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`51853c7`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#discussion_r58494680
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -351,7 +364,8 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBaseV
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#discussion_r58494801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -351,7 +364,8 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBaseV
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-205687506
**[Test build #54957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54957/consoleFull)**
for PR 12061 at commit
[`892bdd3`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205687550
**[Test build #54965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54965/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205688006
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205687999
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-205687976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205687993
**[Test build #54963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`51853c7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12061#issuecomment-205687981
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12076#issuecomment-205690484
My understanding so far:
- [Marcelo
showed](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12076#issuecomment-204129446) that
we can use shaded Kryo in Hive.
- Whi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205690703
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205690684
**[Test build #54965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54965/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205690702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58495835
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205691654
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#discussion_r58495982
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -75,17 +75,17 @@ statement
| ALTER TABLE tableIdent
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58496003
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205693294
**[Test build #54966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54966/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58496298
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58496446
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58496601
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205695469
```
[warn] module not found:
org.pentaho#pentaho-aggdesigner-algorithm;5.1.5-jhyde
[warn] public: tried
[warn]
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205695666
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58496898
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205697694
**[Test build #54966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54966/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58497208
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/JobScheduler.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +103,10 @@ class JobScheduler(val ssc: StreamingC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205697766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205697772
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#discussion_r58497305
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -234,6 +236,16 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: Streami
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205698073
**[Test build #54960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54960/consoleFull)**
for PR 12087 at commit
[`dbfb4ac`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205698938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12087#issuecomment-205698943
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205699286
**[Test build #54967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54967/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`51853c7`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205698876
**[Test build #54959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54959/consoleFull)**
for PR 12169 at commit
[`b6c1601`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12154#issuecomment-205699344
@tdas Looks great. I think you could add more comments in the code but the
rest is pretty good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205699750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-205699757
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12172
[SPARK-13944][ML][WIP] Separate out local linear algebra as a standalone
module without Spark dependency
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Separate out linear algebra as a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12172#issuecomment-205702642
**[Test build #54968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54968/consoleFull)**
for PR 12172 at commit
[`cb95b0c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12172#issuecomment-205702977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12172#issuecomment-205702978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12172#issuecomment-205702974
**[Test build #54968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54968/consoleFull)**
for PR 12172 at commit
[`cb95b0c`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#discussion_r58498334
--- Diff: tools/pom.xml ---
@@ -71,6 +71,16 @@
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-source-plugin
+
+
+
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173
[SPARK-13792][SQL] Limit logging of bad records in CSVRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in `PERMISSIVE` and `DROPMALFORMED` modes we log any record that
is g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205704283
Great cleanup!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11461#issuecomment-205704784
@nongli ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136#issuecomment-205705544
**[Test build #54961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12136 at commit
[`891f448`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205705955
**[Test build #54969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54969/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
[`f458080`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136#issuecomment-205706094
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12136#issuecomment-205706099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205706530
**[Test build #2756 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2756/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://g
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205707080
From the Jenkins Maven output:
```
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process (default) @
spark-hive_2.11 ---
Downloading:
https://repo1.ma
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r58499601
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -176,4 +186,13 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205708291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12164
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12164#issuecomment-205708221
Sorry they are actually used somewhere, closing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205708295
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205708269
**[Test build #54969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54969/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
[`f458080`](https://g
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205708698
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205709125
**[Test build #54970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54970/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
[`f458080`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205709605
```
org.apache.maven.model.building.ModelBuildingException: 10 problems were
encountered while building the effective model for
org.apache.spark:spark-hive_2.11:2
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12167
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12167#issuecomment-205711571
Wrong 'fix' -- several other code paths rely on the behavior of
`CheckpointReader.read`. This will have to be deal with elsewhere to improve
the error message
---
If y
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205712227
In fact, being able to use the nice wildcard syntax may be a way's off
because the official sbt-pom-reader doesn't support Maven 3.3.x due to API
incompatibilities:
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10225#issuecomment-205712538
@JoshRosen I am not sure if this still be part of your refactorings, or can
we bring up this PR? This PR is quite critical performance improvement when
mixed PCI
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205712554
**[Test build #54971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54971/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`fc938a0`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205712989
_Actually_, we might be able to use `sbt-pom-reader` 2.10-RC2, since we
only require Maven 3.2.1+ and that artifact uses 3.2.2:
https://github.com/sbt/sbt-pom-reader/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205714338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205714343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205714331
**[Test build #54971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54971/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`fc938a0`](https://g
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#discussion_r58502169
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -296,10 +290,89 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205717007
**[Test build #54972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54972/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`36430de`](https://gi
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#discussion_r58503061
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -428,40 +503,93 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(conf:
SparkConf)
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174
[SPARK-13211] [STREAMING] StreamingContext throws NoSuchElementException
when created from non-existent checkpoint directory
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Take 2: avoi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-205717485
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-205717478
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205719259
**[Test build #54964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54964/consoleFull)**
for PR 12146 at commit
[`b7fac20`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205719312
**[Test build #54967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54967/consoleFull)**
for PR 12171 at commit
[`51853c7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205719362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205719389
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#issuecomment-205719398
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12171#issuecomment-205719339
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12170#issuecomment-205719693
**[Test build #54962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54962/consoleFull)**
for PR 12170 at commit
[`6afb3fb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12170#issuecomment-205719853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12170#issuecomment-205719833
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user lresende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r58505416
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -176,4 +186,13 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205722537
**[Test build #2756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2756/consoleFull)**
for PR 12134 at commit
[`8a7fcf6`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11468#issuecomment-205723699
**[Test build #54974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54974/consoleFull)**
for PR 11468 at commit
[`822c844`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134#issuecomment-205723972
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12134
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11468#issuecomment-205728072
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11468#issuecomment-205728037
**[Test build #54974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54974/consoleFull)**
for PR 11468 at commit
[`822c844`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11468#issuecomment-205728077
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205728122
**[Test build #54970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54970/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
[`f458080`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205728584
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-205728582
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-205728972
**[Test build #54975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54975/consoleFull)**
for PR 11298 at commit
[`50071e2`](https://gi
1 - 100 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
