Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-206050383
One open question, thats come from keeping up with master, for the
reviewers (I guess @dbtsai once he has some spare cycles) is if code generator
should live under tree
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206049857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206049856
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206049830
**[Test build #55063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55063/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206049732
Minor point: would it make sense to also update the PyDoc for unpersist to
match the scaladoc while we are fixing its behavior anyways?
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12047#issuecomment-206048632
**[Test build #55065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55065/consoleFull)**
for PR 12047 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206047077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206047081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206047062
**[Test build #55062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55062/consoleFull)**
for PR 12190 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206046488
**[Test build #55062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55062/consoleFull)**
for PR 12190 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206046462
**[Test build #55063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55063/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-206046532
**[Test build #55064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55064/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-206045392
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-206045390
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12141
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-206045304
**[Test build #55045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55045/consoleFull)**
for PR 12174 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#issuecomment-206045152
**[Test build #55061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55061/consoleFull)**
for PR 12119 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206044980
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206044946
**[Test build #55052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55052/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206044982
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12141#issuecomment-206044794
LGTM, merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206044561
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206044562
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206044559
**[Test build #55060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55060/consoleFull)**
for PR 12190 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190#issuecomment-206044309
**[Test build #55060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55060/consoleFull)**
for PR 12190 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#discussion_r58635507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -275,23 +279,64 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r58635476
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -176,4 +186,13 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12190
[SPARK-14119] [SQL] Improve HashedRelation for key fit within Long
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we use java HashMap for HashedRelation if the key could fit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206043600
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206043462
**[Test build #55053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55053/consoleFull)**
for PR 12189 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206043594
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-206043222
> Also, because of that method, the return value of
getConf(CHECKPOINT_LOCATION) would be String and not Option[String], which is
probably why intellij is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#discussion_r58635261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -275,23 +279,64 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206043088
**[Test build #55059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55059/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user joan38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12157#discussion_r58634718
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -53,14 +53,22 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{NextIterator,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#issuecomment-206041708
**[Test build #55057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55057/consoleFull)**
for PR 12119 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#issuecomment-206041715
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206041665
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#issuecomment-206041712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206041655
**[Test build #55056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55056/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206041662
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#issuecomment-206041439
**[Test build #55057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55057/consoleFull)**
for PR 12119 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-206041431
**[Test build #55058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55058/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206041318
> super may not be used on value minRegisteredRatio
Scala doesn't allow to override a val and call super.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-206041420
`CHECKPOINT_LOCATION` was a weird one; because it didn't have a default
value before my changes, and this was the best way I found to map it.
There's a new
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12119#discussion_r58634150
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -275,23 +279,64 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12020#discussion_r58634140
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tuning.py ---
@@ -112,15 +198,24 @@ class CrossValidator(Estimator, HasSeed):
>>> cvModel = cv.fit(dataset)
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#discussion_r58634134
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -47,18 +48,40 @@ case class AnalyzeTable(tableName: String)
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#discussion_r58634059
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -47,18 +48,40 @@ case class AnalyzeTable(tableName: String)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206040363
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206040360
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206040332
**[Test build #55042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55042/consoleFull)**
for PR 12161 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206040248
**[Test build #55056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55056/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-206039890
In particular the implicit wrapping of `OptionalConfigEntry[T]` to be a
`ConfigEntry[Option[T]]` coupled with the unwrapping done via overloading of
`getConf` took me
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206039892
retest this please, it should be fixed by now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user lresende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#discussion_r58633691
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetAggregatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -176,4 +186,13 @@ class DatasetAggregatorSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#issuecomment-206039464
**[Test build #55055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55055/consoleFull)**
for PR 11621 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206039488
**[Test build #55053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55053/consoleFull)**
for PR 12189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-206039487
**[Test build #55054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55054/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189
[SPARK-14418] [PYSPARK] fix unpersist of Broadcast in Python
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Broaccast.unpersist() will remove the file of broadcast, which
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12189#issuecomment-206039178
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-206038985
okay and fixed. Please re-check again? cc: @falaki
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206038892
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206038895
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206038874
**[Test build #55047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55047/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038608
**[Test build #55052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55052/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038639
The upcoming test *UserDefinedTypeSuite.UDTs with JSON and Dataset* is
going to fail.
Can you confirm that this is due to the lack of support of UDTs in Datasets
or
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-206038586
**[Test build #55051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55051/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-206038435
> In what case do we need overloading?
This was part of a previous conversation in this thread. One of the
features in the new API that wasn't present in the
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#discussion_r58632900
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSqlParser.scala
---
@@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ class HiveSqlAstBuilder extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038039
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038019
The upcoming test *UserDefinedTypeSuite.UDTs with JSON and Dataset* is
going to fail.
Can you confirm that this is due to the lack of support of UDTs in Datasets
or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12146#discussion_r58632748
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -47,18 +47,38 @@ case class AnalyzeTable(tableName: String)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206038036
**[Test build #55050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55050/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206037774
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-206037747
**[Test build #55049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55049/consoleFull)**
for PR 12169 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206037758
**[Test build #55050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55050/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206037771
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#discussion_r58632645
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSqlParser.scala
---
@@ -215,11 +215,20 @@ class HiveSqlAstBuilder extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12186#issuecomment-206037768
**[Test build #55048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55048/consoleFull)**
for PR 12186 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12161#issuecomment-206037766
cc @nongli
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-206037824
LGTM we just need to make tests pass now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206037762
**[Test build #55046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55046/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206037739
**[Test build #55047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55047/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12169#issuecomment-206037592
Build is broken I think. retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12184#issuecomment-206037177
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12184#issuecomment-206037180
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12182#issuecomment-206037026
@infynyxx I think this one is on the borderline. I would just create one so
everyone is happy.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206036235
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#discussion_r58632211
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -39,9 +39,12 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206035976
**[Test build #55044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55044/consoleFull)**
for PR 12188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206035998
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12184#issuecomment-206036164
**[Test build #55029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55029/consoleFull)**
for PR 12184 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206036081
Thanks, I love this patch!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#issuecomment-206035994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12188#discussion_r58632162
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -43,24 +44,30 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-206035246
**[Test build #55046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55046/consoleFull)**
for PR 12149 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12186#issuecomment-206035348
what... retest this please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12174#issuecomment-206035185
**[Test build #55045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55045/consoleFull)**
for PR 12174 at commit
201 - 300 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
