Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213676984
**[Test build #56786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56786/consoleFull)**
for PR 12633 at commit
[`9892ab5`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213676321
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-213676200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-213676197
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213676323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213676118
**[Test build #56777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56777/consoleFull)**
for PR 12497 at commit
[`90e57c8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-213676097
**[Test build #56779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56779/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
[`dd50130`](https://g
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#discussion_r60824241
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -78,29 +78,66 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213675764
**[Test build #56785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56785/consoleFull)**
for PR 12633 at commit
[`2d4ddc8`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213675544
also cc @liancheng who wrote some of the original code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213675496
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#discussion_r60824199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -78,29 +78,66 @@ class SessionCatalog(
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633
[SPARK-14865][SQL] Better error handling for view creation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves error handling in view creation. CreateViewCommand
itself will a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#issuecomment-213673760
**[Test build #56784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56784/consoleFull)**
for PR 12402 at commit
[`16d94f4`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213673399
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-213673280
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-213673279
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213673237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-213673246
**[Test build #56776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56776/consoleFull)**
for PR 12239 at commit
[`82add06`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213673239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213673202
**[Test build #56778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56778/consoleFull)**
for PR 12497 at commit
[`ab42268`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12632#issuecomment-213671887
**[Test build #56783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12632 at commit
[`d20e167`](https://gi
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12632
[SPARK-14868] Enable NewLineAtEofChecker in checkstyle and fix lint-java
errors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark uses `NewLineAtEofChecker` rule in Scala by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213670420
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213670418
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213670329
**[Test build #56775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56775/consoleFull)**
for PR 12629 at commit
[`e5dec86`](https://g
Github user robbinspg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12397#issuecomment-213670252
Can we re test this as I think there was a minor change since the test build
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user robbinspg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12501#issuecomment-213670198
closing this in favour of other implementation
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user robbinspg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12501
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319#issuecomment-213669972
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630#issuecomment-213669781
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213669684
**[Test build #56782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56782/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`3690c7c`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12626
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user pravingadakh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213668195
@dbtsai I'll update the PR soon, I have been overwhelmed by office work :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12626#issuecomment-213668471
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12626#issuecomment-213667937
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9490#issuecomment-213668158
ping @zjffdu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-213667639
**[Test build #56781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56781/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
[`bfe536e`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213667183
Merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213666884
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213666883
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213666846
**[Test build #56774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56774/consoleFull)**
for PR 12619 at commit
[`6056a47`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630#issuecomment-213666752
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630#issuecomment-213666751
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630#issuecomment-213666711
**[Test build #56771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56771/consoleFull)**
for PR 12630 at commit
[`06ff604`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631#issuecomment-21364
**[Test build #56780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56780/consoleFull)**
for PR 12631 at commit
[`56355fa`](https://gi
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631
[SPARK-14867][BUILD] Make `build/mvn` to use the downloaded maven if it
exists.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `build/mvn` provides a convenient optio
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12590#issuecomment-213666548
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12590#issuecomment-213666547
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12590#issuecomment-213666496
**[Test build #56772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56772/consoleFull)**
for PR 12590 at commit
[`bda4ae6`](https://g
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r60823427
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +105,25 @@ class GaussianMixtureModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r60823428
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +105,25 @@ class GaussianMixtureModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r60823426
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +105,25 @@ class GaussianMixtureModel private[ml] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-213664760
**[Test build #56779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56779/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
[`dd50130`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663862
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663864
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663616
**[Test build #56767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56767/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`4acfb8c`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213663512
**[Test build #56778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56778/consoleFull)**
for PR 12497 at commit
[`ab42268`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663454
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213663449
@srowen I have reviewed all scala files in Graphx and some in SQL. And
remove another some unused imports in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663455
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213663432
**[Test build #56766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56766/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`04cc43b`](https://g
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12124#issuecomment-213663303
I'm working on a simpler fix for now:
[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14862]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12497#issuecomment-213663339
**[Test build #56777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56777/consoleFull)**
for PR 12497 at commit
[`90e57c8`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-213663172
**[Test build #56776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56776/consoleFull)**
for PR 12239 at commit
[`82add06`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-213663159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-213663160
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-213663125
**[Test build #56768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56768/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
[`92f8f38`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-213663088
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12599#discussion_r60823141
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/object.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +83,28 @@ case class SerializeFromObject(
Github user JustinPihony commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#issuecomment-213662908
@HyukjinKwon I just posted on the JIRA the background of `Properties` and
how reasonable it is to assume it can be converted to a `String`.
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319#issuecomment-213662852
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319#issuecomment-213662854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319#issuecomment-213662817
**[Test build #56770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56770/consoleFull)**
for PR 12319 at commit
[`d6bc52d`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12319#issuecomment-213662708
**[Test build #2859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2859/consoleFull)**
for PR 12319 at commit
[`d6bc52d`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213662696
**[Test build #56775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56775/consoleFull)**
for PR 12629 at commit
[`e5dec86`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#discussion_r60822985
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -1306,4 +1306,33 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Lo
Github user koertkuipers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6848#issuecomment-213661475
@holdenk ok i tried to make it look all pretty
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213661444
**[Test build #56774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56774/consoleFull)**
for PR 12619 at commit
[`6056a47`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r60822740
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) und
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213661096
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213661097
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-213661066
**[Test build #56765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56765/consoleFull)**
for PR 12629 at commit
[`ccd3c7b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213660941
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213660938
**[Test build #56773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56773/consoleFull)**
for PR 12619 at commit
[`871c009`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213660940
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#discussion_r60822682
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -308,8 +304,11 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12619#issuecomment-213660896
**[Test build #56773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56773/consoleFull)**
for PR 12619 at commit
[`871c009`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12590#issuecomment-213660696
**[Test build #56772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56772/consoleFull)**
for PR 12590 at commit
[`bda4ae6`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630#issuecomment-213660698
**[Test build #56771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56771/consoleFull)**
for PR 12630 at commit
[`06ff604`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12590#issuecomment-213660622
Rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12630
[SPARK-14866][SQL] Break SQLQuerySuite out into smaller test suites
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch breaks SQLQuerySuite out into smaller test suites. It was a
littl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12615#issuecomment-213660185
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12615#issuecomment-213660186
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12615#issuecomment-213660152
**[Test build #56764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56764/consoleFull)**
for PR 12615 at commit
[`957c3c1`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12615
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
1 - 100 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
