Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214559472
**[Test build #56926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56926/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214559264
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214559051
**[Test build #56925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56925/consoleFull)**
for PR 12659 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214558807
**[Test build #2877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2877/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214558763
**[Test build #2876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2876/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673
[SPARK-14555] Second cut of Python API for Structured Streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds Python APIs for:
- `ContinuousQueryManager`
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214558276
**[Test build #56937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56937/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12666#discussion_r61005340
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ private[spark] class Pool(
new
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214558058
should this go to pyspark and sparkR shell as well?
or rather, should SparkSession be in Python and R first?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214557446
**[Test build #2875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2875/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r61004951
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -423,6 +426,102 @@ case class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r61004685
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -423,6 +426,102 @@ case class
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r61004682
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Vectors.scala ---
@@ -561,10 +589,11 @@ object DenseVector {
* @param indices index
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214556361
@davies this should still be able to pass RAT checks though. It has a valid
license header. This is a fine PR @dongjoon-hyun but as long as the text of the
license in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672#issuecomment-214555947
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672#issuecomment-214555849
**[Test build #56934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56934/consoleFull)**
for PR 12672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672#issuecomment-214555946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r61004014
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -415,13 +443,14 @@ object DenseMatrix {
*
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#issuecomment-21435
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r61003884
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -154,11 +172,12 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
*
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r61003756
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -277,9 +277,18 @@ class InMemoryCatalog
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12671#issuecomment-214555251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12671#issuecomment-214555250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214555235
**[Test build #56936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56936/consoleFull)**
for PR 12663 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12671#issuecomment-214555161
**[Test build #56933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56933/consoleFull)**
for PR 12671 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214554790
Thanks! updated now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-214554406
ping @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672#issuecomment-214554637
Maybe also include a sanity check to make sure it can be created and try
some basic functions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12421#issuecomment-214554325
**[Test build #56935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56935/consoleFull)**
for PR 12421 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r61003261
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +65,76 @@ abstract class Classifier[
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672#issuecomment-214554315
**[Test build #56934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56934/consoleFull)**
for PR 12672 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12629#issuecomment-214554156
Could you review this please? @davies and @viirya
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12672
[SPARK-14904][SQL] Put removed HiveContext in compatibility module
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is for users who can't upgrade and need to continue to use
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12579#issuecomment-214553367
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214553151
@sun-rui It looks like some Catalyst tests are failing repeatedly. Can you
check if its related to this PR or not ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12671#issuecomment-214553039
**[Test build #56933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56933/consoleFull)**
for PR 12671 at commit
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12671
[SPARK-14903] Revert SPARK-14071: MLWritable.write property
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-14071 changed MLWritable.write to be a property. This reverts that
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214552085
**[Test build #56932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56932/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214551063
**[Test build #56931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56931/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61001243
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " +
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214550450
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61000897
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " +
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214549712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214549715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214549507
**[Test build #56919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56919/consoleFull)**
for PR 12589 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-214548885
**[Test build #56930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56930/consoleFull)**
for PR 12239 at commit
Github user sbcd90 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12666#issuecomment-214548968
Hi @jaceklaskowski ,
Thanks for your review. I think it is safe that we make the changes at both
the places.
I also checked for the occurrence of scheduler
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12670#issuecomment-214548824
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-214548556
@vanzin I guess using java doc `/* @since /*` style, it's harder to
document the public variables in the constructor. Just my 0.02 cents.
---
If your project is set
GitHub user GayathriMurali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12670
[SPARK-14894][Pyspark] Add result summary API to Gaussian Mixture
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add summary API to Gaussian Mixture in Pyspark
## How
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214548154
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214548152
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214547976
**[Test build #56920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56920/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#discussion_r60999511
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -192,46 +191,45 @@ class SparkSession private(
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214546851
**[Test build #56929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56929/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12667#issuecomment-214545001
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12667#issuecomment-214544995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12667#issuecomment-214544438
**[Test build #56922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56922/consoleFull)**
for PR 12667 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214544132
**[Test build #2874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2874/consoleFull)**
for PR 12589 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214543598
**[Test build #2872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2872/consoleFull)**
for PR 12589 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214543711
**[Test build #2873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2873/consoleFull)**
for PR 12589 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214543499
Do you want to add the test code for both `MultivariateGaussian.scala` and
`Utils.scala`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214542583
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214542589
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214542146
**[Test build #56918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56918/consoleFull)**
for PR 12493 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#issuecomment-214540648
I think the API looks a little clunky (and that's mostly because the code
it's trying to abstract is a little clunky itself), but as far as this change
goes, it looks
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214539925
**[Test build #56928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56928/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#discussion_r60996892
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214539753
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#discussion_r60996696
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214539717
**[Test build #56927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56927/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214539752
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#discussion_r60996595
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#discussion_r60996505
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSchedulerCreationSuite.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ class SparkContextSchedulerCreationSuite
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#discussion_r60996366
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/distribution/MultivariateGaussian.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#discussion_r60996174
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixture.scala ---
@@ -17,17 +17,19 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.clustering
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214537526
**[Test build #56927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56927/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r60995516
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214536972
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214536971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12641#issuecomment-214536946
LGTM.
cc @vanzin and @tgravescs for a quick look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214536711
**[Test build #56923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56923/consoleFull)**
for PR 12668 at commit
Github user a-roberts commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12397#issuecomment-214536410
@hvanhovell I'm working with Pete on this, with this patch around 220
failing tests now pass on BE leaving us with only a handful to investigate,
this fix definitely
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r60994954
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214535786
**[Test build #56926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56926/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669
[SPARK-14902][SQL] Expose RuntimeConfig in SparkSession
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`RuntimeConfig` is the new user-facing API in 2.0 added in #11378. Until
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r60994309
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214530675
**[Test build #56925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56925/consoleFull)**
for PR 12659 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214528787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214528791
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214528756
**[Test build #56924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56924/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214528780
**[Test build #56924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56924/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-214527801
Any thoughts? I think since we are explicitly deprecating MLLib it would be
nice to get something in for PMML export in the pipeline API.
---
If your project is set up
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12397#issuecomment-214526973
@robbinspg is this the only thing keeping us from running Spark on BE
platforms?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12281#issuecomment-214527003
cc @davies ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871#discussion_r60991630
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StopWordsRemover.scala ---
@@ -98,7 +46,7 @@ class StopWordsRemover(override val uid: String)
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12666#discussion_r60991107
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ private[spark] class Pool(
new
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214523148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
301 - 400 of 786 matches
Mail list logo
