Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-216761109
**[Test build #57730 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57730/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
[`6ecc00e`](https://gi
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753#issuecomment-216760992
@rxin, Please have a look into this and let me know any thing needs to be
done here. About @, M/R also uses @ for the taskid wild card in java opts and
there is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-216760706
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-216760705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-216760656
**[Test build #57726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57726/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
[`c1961ae`](https://g
Github user MLnick closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12577
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753#discussion_r61995355
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -166,14 +166,15 @@ private[spark] cla
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12364#issuecomment-216760181
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216760048
@jkbradley Thanks for your comments. I want to make sure that you said we
will freeze the pyspark.mllib.linalg APIs, so do I need to change the current
PySpark ml/mllib
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12844#issuecomment-216759826
**[Test build #57729 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57729/consoleFull)**
for PR 12844 at commit
[`b5dbc15`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12888#issuecomment-216759643
Thanks for tackling this issue :) For a better understanding - is there a
reason why adding a flag for this behaviour instead of just changing it (since
it is a bug) -
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10924#issuecomment-216759444
> On 4 mai 2016, at 02:22, Sebastien Rainville
wrote:
>
> @dragos I finally did the change. Sorry for the delay
>
Excellent, thanks! I won't be ab
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12888#discussion_r61994856
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ def getOrDefault(self, param):
return self._defaultParamMap[param]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-216759233
**[Test build #57726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57726/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
[`c1961ae`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216759232
**[Test build #57728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57728/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`7df46dc`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12883#issuecomment-216759235
**[Test build #57727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57727/consoleFull)**
for PR 12883 at commit
[`51c9ae9`](https://gi
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
[SPARK-15113][PySpark][ML] Add missing num features num classes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing `numFeatures` and `numClasses` to the wrapped Java models in
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12885#issuecomment-216758934
: ) Partially right. Even if the function is loaded, we might not be able
to find it. The reason is we might not specify the database name in `Describe
Function`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216758801
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216758796
**[Test build #57725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57725/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`731`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216758799
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216758602
**[Test build #57725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57725/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`731`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12883#issuecomment-216758603
**[Test build #57724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57724/consoleFull)**
for PR 12883 at commit
[`ba4ce9d`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12364#issuecomment-216758272
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12364#issuecomment-216758270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12364#issuecomment-216758163
**[Test build #57716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57716/consoleFull)**
for PR 12364 at commit
[`8870650`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216757717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216757713
**[Test build #57723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57723/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`b504a60`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216757716
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12866
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12870#issuecomment-216757529
**[Test build #57723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57723/consoleFull)**
for PR 12870 at commit
[`b504a60`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12873#discussion_r61993910
--- Diff: repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/Main.scala
---
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ object Main extends Logging {
def createSpar
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12866#issuecomment-216755741
Thanks for the review! Merged this to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user hujy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12888
[SPARK-14772][ML,PySpark]Python ML Params.copy treats uid, paramMaps â¦
[SPARK-14772](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14772#)
##What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12888#issuecomment-216755365
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12879#issuecomment-216753341
ping @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12204#issuecomment-216753358
ping @cloud-fan @yhuai Any more comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#discussion_r61993129
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/window.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor license a
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#discussion_r61992959
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -594,6 +594,35 @@ setMethod("repartition",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
+#' RepartitionBy
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#issuecomment-216752641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#issuecomment-216752640
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#issuecomment-216752537
**[Test build #57713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57713/consoleFull)**
for PR 12810 at commit
[`2e949c8`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-216752333
@andrewor14 I also think about creating directory in implementation of
create database.
Metastore APIs created the directory for us no matter whether the pr
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#issuecomment-216751557
Thanks - merging in master / branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#issuecomment-216751414
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#issuecomment-216751245
@buckhx These API seems useful, could you also add an argument for
bin/spark-submit (only for requirement file) ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#issuecomment-216751198
**[Test build #57721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57721/consoleFull)**
for PR 12884 at commit
[`69c483e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-216751211
**[Test build #57722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57722/consoleFull)**
for PR 12081 at commit
[`b885f7b`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#discussion_r61992444
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -814,6 +817,40 @@ def addPyFile(self, path):
import importlib
importlib.invalidate
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12844#discussion_r61992398
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -290,29 +291,88 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(table:
Tab
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12844#discussion_r61992394
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -290,29 +291,88 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(table:
Tab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#issuecomment-216750804
I reset the changes. They are taking too long to run.
In the future, we should revisit this file and break it down into multiple
files grouped by category (e.g. jo
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-216750713
Ok - if the behavior we get from `dapply(repartition(df, cols))` is the
same as `groupByKey().flatMap` then I'm fine with going with the simpler
implementation.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#discussion_r61992299
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -814,6 +817,40 @@ def addPyFile(self, path):
import importlib
importlib.invalidate
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#discussion_r61992184
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1947,6 +1947,33 @@ def test_with_stop(self):
sc.stop()
self.assertEqual(SparkContext._a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216750238
**[Test build #57720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57720/consoleFull)**
for PR 12818 at commit
[`3b289d9`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216750176
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216749947
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216749940
**[Test build #57718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57718/consoleFull)**
for PR 12818 at commit
[`3b289d9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216749945
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#discussion_r61991923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -148,9 +148,17 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12866#issuecomment-216749798
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12828#issuecomment-216749648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12828#issuecomment-216749645
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12828#issuecomment-216749556
**[Test build #57711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57711/consoleFull)**
for PR 12828 at commit
[`252065c`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#issuecomment-216749580
**[Test build #2967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2967/consoleFull)**
for PR 12398 at commit
[`ce9966e`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12398#issuecomment-216749512
**[Test build #2967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2967/consoleFull)**
for PR 12398 at commit
[`ce9966e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216749347
**[Test build #57718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57718/consoleFull)**
for PR 12818 at commit
[`3b289d9`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#issuecomment-216749350
**[Test build #57719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57719/consoleFull)**
for PR 12810 at commit
[`041b7fe`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-216749219
The number of partition could be specified in repartitioning() (or 200 as
default).
`KeyValueGroupedDataset.flatMapGroups()` accept a function as `(K,
Iterator[
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#issuecomment-216749047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12716#issuecomment-216749038
@yhuai @liancheng @liancheng @hvanhovell Can any of you help taking a quick
look at this change? Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#issuecomment-216749048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#issuecomment-216749012
**[Test build #57715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57715/consoleFull)**
for PR 12887 at commit
[`3ee277a`](https://g
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12804#issuecomment-216748933
@yhuai @liancheng @liancheng @hvanhovell Can any of you help take a quick
look at this change? Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216748780
Oh, I misunderstood your first comment.I think I should not take out
`setLineSeparator()` here but maybe I should open another issue ticket to set
`normalizeLineEnd
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-216748843
**[Test build #57717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57717/consoleFull)**
for PR 12081 at commit
[`59a9805`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12872#issuecomment-216748484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#issuecomment-216748498
We changed the number of rows in same benchmark, but did not update the
results, should we also update the result?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12872#issuecomment-216748483
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12872#issuecomment-216748405
**[Test build #57710 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57710/consoleFull)**
for PR 12872 at commit
[`1e20bb0`](https://g
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12884#discussion_r61991224
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BenchmarkWholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -346,7 +373,7 @@ class BenchmarkWholeStageCodegen ex
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#discussion_r61991201
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -348,4 +364,99 @@ class HiveDDLSuite extends QueryTest wi
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#discussion_r61991132
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -41,19 +41,17 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Github user jbax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216747285
Foo and bar are part of the same value, they just happen to have a line
ending in between. And yes `setLineSeparator()` it is related to the values
themselves when writing
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12810#discussion_r61991082
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -41,19 +41,17 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#discussion_r61991037
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -594,6 +594,35 @@ setMethod("repartition",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
+#' RepartitionByC
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-216745696
But, this PR does not allow it for ensuring the atomicity of the command.
https://github.com/gatorsmile/spark/blob/banDropMultiPart/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-216745078
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#issuecomment-216745101
**[Test build #57715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57715/consoleFull)**
for PR 12887 at commit
[`3ee277a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-216745080
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12364#issuecomment-216745065
**[Test build #57716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57716/consoleFull)**
for PR 12364 at commit
[`8870650`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-216744413
```scala
case class AlterTableDropPartition(
tableName: TableIdentifier,
specs: Seq[TablePartitionSpec],
ifExists: Boolean)
```
The
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-216744662
**[Test build #57709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57709/consoleFull)**
for PR 12655 at commit
[`ab92488`](https://g
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12887#discussion_r61990844
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -594,6 +594,35 @@ setMethod("repartition",
dataFrame(sdf)
})
+#' Repartitio
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-216743828
what if the partition spec of the table is a, b, and we do `ALTER TABLE tbl
DROP PARTITION (a=1, b=1) PARTITION (a=1,b=2)`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216743678
@jbax Ah, I guess `foo` and `bar` are separate rows, right? `stripLineEnd`
will be applied for each row.
If I got you wrong and `setLineSeparator()` is rela
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12881
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jbax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12818#issuecomment-216743260
What happens if you do this:
```
scala> "foo\r\nbar\r\n".stripLineEnd
```
Shouldn't the result be this?
```
res0: String = foo\r\n
bar
```
1 - 100 of 978 matches
Mail list logo
