Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-217492075
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-217491949
**[Test build #58002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58002/consoleFull)**
for PR 12952 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12897#issuecomment-217491293
@hvanhovell What is the behavior of 1.6? Does 1.6 treat `L` as a suffix for
a bigint literal?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217489895
I don't understand `./dev/mima` passes on my laptop. I also verified that
`./dev/mima` fails without my changes in `MimaExcludes.scala`. Something weird
with the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217488982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217488980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217488726
**[Test build #57998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12893 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#discussion_r62352447
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -394,7 +405,7 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @group basic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217485501
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217485502
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217485371
**[Test build #57999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57999/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
Github user RussellSpitzer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10655#issuecomment-217483240
Sorry I forgot about this, I'll clean this up tomorrow and get it ready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12958#issuecomment-217482035
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957#issuecomment-217481568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957#issuecomment-217481571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957#issuecomment-217481463
**[Test build #58005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58005/consoleFull)**
for PR 12957 at commit
GitHub user agsachin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12958
SPARK-15183
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
while experimenting with structure streaming. I found that mode() is used
for non-continuous queries while outputMode() is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957#issuecomment-217478950
**[Test build #58005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58005/consoleFull)**
for PR 12957 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957
[SPARK-15182] [ML] Copy MLlib doc to ML: ml.feature
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should now begin copying algorithm details from the spark.mllib guide to
spark.ml
Github user skonto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217477341
@mgummelt ready.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-217477017
@markgrover Mind adding `Closes #10681` in the PR description so that
merging script can close that together?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956#issuecomment-217474807
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217475441
**[Test build #58004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58004/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956#issuecomment-217474810
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956#issuecomment-217474554
**[Test build #57997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57997/consoleFull)**
for PR 12956 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-217473744
**[Test build #58002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58002/consoleFull)**
for PR 12952 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949#issuecomment-217473754
**[Test build #58003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58003/consoleFull)**
for PR 12949 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217472088
**[Test build #57994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57994/consoleFull)**
for PR 12954 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#discussion_r62345191
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -463,7 +463,12 @@ class SparkSession private(
*/
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#discussion_r62345241
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -502,7 +507,7 @@ class SparkSession private(
/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217472869
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217472873
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217472670
**[Test build #57993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12933 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-217472671
Hi, @cloud-fan .
Now, it's ready for review.
Could you review this when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217472331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217472325
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217471682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217471690
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217471315
**[Test build #57995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57995/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#issuecomment-217468171
**[Test build #58000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58000/consoleFull)**
for PR 12953 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949#issuecomment-217468181
**[Test build #58001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58001/consoleFull)**
for PR 12949 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217467789
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#discussion_r62342197
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -389,11 +389,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user ntietz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217467133
Good call, I will add it to the Java version as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cenyuhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217466944
@andrewor14 I alter the code as what you said, but the test failed because
of timeout. It seems like that it is none of my business...
---
If your project is set up
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217463479
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217465989
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217465986
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217465951
How about doc'ing the Java version as well in JavaRDDLike.scala?
You're welcome to expand on the java/scaladoc of lots of these methods.
It'd be nicer to have more
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217465665
**[Test build #57992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57992/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217465398
**[Test build #57999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57999/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217465397
**[Test build #57998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57998/consoleFull)**
for PR 12893 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10655#issuecomment-217465276
ping @RussellSpitzer
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#discussion_r62340446
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -389,11 +389,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-217461632
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956#issuecomment-217457647
**[Test build #57997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57997/consoleFull)**
for PR 12956 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956#issuecomment-217456943
Codes:
val ds = Seq(("a", 10), ("a", 20), ("b", 1), ("b", 2), ("c",
1)).toDS().filter("_2 + 1 > 5").filter("_2 + 1 > 20")
ds.collect()
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#issuecomment-217456649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#issuecomment-217456641
**[Test build #57996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57996/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#issuecomment-217456651
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217456515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217456518
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#issuecomment-217456405
**[Test build #57996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57996/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217456396
**[Test build #57982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57982/consoleFull)**
for PR 11546 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12956
[SPARK-15180][SQL] Support subexpression elimination in Fliter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch tries to add the support of subexpression elimination in
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62336356
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62336181
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217452079
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ntietz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955
[Docs] Added Scaladoc for countApprox and countByValueApprox parameters
This pull request simply adds Scaladoc documentation of the parameters for
countApprox and countByValueApprox.
This
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12897#issuecomment-217451180
@rxin @yhuai what is the next step? Are we changing the behavior? Or
keeping it as it is?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r62334156
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#issuecomment-217450001
@holdenk - `TransportConf` is not specific to the , it is used to create
Transport client in other modules as well. Since number of index cache entry is
very
Github user dominik-jastrzebski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12895#issuecomment-217449436
Ok, I can check the other validators in `treeParams.scala`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#issuecomment-217449336
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#issuecomment-217449332
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#issuecomment-217449102
**[Test build #57990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57990/consoleFull)**
for PR 12953 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217448700
**[Test build #57995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57995/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-217447705
@pravingadakh go ahead - would be good to get this in for 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#discussion_r62331757
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ShuffleIndexRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217447455
**[Test build #57994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57994/consoleFull)**
for PR 12954 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217447302
cc @rxin @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951#discussion_r62332468
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.{ConcurrentHashMap,
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954
[SPARK-15122][SQL] Fix TPC-DS 41 - Normalize predicates before pulling them
out
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The official TPC-DS 41 query currently fails because it
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#discussion_r62332230
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -428,40 +503,89 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217446062
**[Test build #57993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57993/consoleFull)**
for PR 12933 at commit
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217445754
Rebasing against master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user clockfly commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217445675
@davies
I made some changes in UI, please check whether it is better now?
```
scala> spark.sql("select * from tt").explain()
== Physical Plan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12936#issuecomment-217444691
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12936#issuecomment-217444695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951#discussion_r62331312
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.{ConcurrentHashMap,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12936#issuecomment-21725
**[Test build #57987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57987/consoleFull)**
for PR 12936 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951#discussion_r62330957
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -47,6 +49,15 @@ private[spark] class Pool(
var name = poolName
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951#discussion_r62330929
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -98,6 +98,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
var
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12953#discussion_r62330597
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -389,11 +389,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12893#issuecomment-217443570
test please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217443219
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217443221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12951#discussion_r62330358
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Pool.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.{ConcurrentHashMap,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217442978
**[Test build #57986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57986/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12936#issuecomment-217442298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
401 - 500 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
