Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12935
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-218675438
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12762#issuecomment-218675488
**[Test build #58455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58455/consoleFull)**
for PR 12762 at commit
[`150321f`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-218675439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-218675297
**[Test build #58449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58449/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`a9bdd5b`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12935#issuecomment-218675018
Thanks. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#discussion_r62972085
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -659,6 +659,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCont
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#discussion_r62971980
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -659,6 +659,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCont
Github user pravingadakh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-218674561
@srowen Yes, please go ahead. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#discussion_r62971803
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -156,22 +157,60 @@ object SamplePushDown extends Rule
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#discussion_r62971440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -156,22 +157,60 @@ object SamplePushDown extends Rule
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#discussion_r62971439
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -590,10 +590,14 @@ def test_fit_minimize_metric(self):
tvsModel = tvs.fit(dataset)
bestMo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218672986
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-218673040
The PR description is inconsistent with changes made in the PR now. Please
update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218672864
**[Test build #58451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58451/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`0915a71`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218672983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072#issuecomment-218672432
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218672415
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218672417
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218672316
**[Test build #58448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58448/consoleFull)**
for PR 12627 at commit
[`1b04840`](https://g
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#discussion_r62970587
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -645,6 +651,37 @@ def test_save_load(self):
self.assertEqual(loadedLrModel.intercept, lrModel.intercep
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62970487
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ private[ml] trait MultilayerPerc
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-218671842
@kayousterhout, @markhamstra any comments plz?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user devaraj-kavali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072
[SPARK-15288] [Mesos] Mesos dispatcher should handle gracefully when any
thread gets UncaughtException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding the default Uncaugh
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62970263
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -1117,6 +1137,56 @@ def getBlockSize(self):
"""
return self.getOrDefault(self.bl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218671105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218671001
**[Test build #58445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58445/consoleFull)**
for PR 12627 at commit
[`1b04840`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218671106
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#issuecomment-218671053
**[Test build #58454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58454/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
[`5d068b5`](https://gi
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-218670776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-218670777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218670622
Oh actually we did document it in the java doc of `Row`, and says users
should use `Seq` for array type. see
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-218670633
**[Test build #58447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58447/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
[`c3748ba`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13068#issuecomment-218670419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13068#issuecomment-218670421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13068#issuecomment-218670295
**[Test build #58444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58444/consoleFull)**
for PR 13068 at commit
[`7e02a0a`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218670057
looks like we haven't documented what kind of field object types is allowed
in a `Row`, let me find a place to document it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13071#issuecomment-218669750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13071#issuecomment-218669753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13071#issuecomment-218669684
**[Test build #58453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58453/consoleFull)**
for PR 13071 at commit
[`274400d`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#discussion_r62969319
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -255,6 +255,19 @@ def range(self, start, end=None, step=1,
numPartitions=None):
return Da
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12935#issuecomment-218669520
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12935#issuecomment-218669521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12935#issuecomment-218669394
**[Test build #58443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58443/consoleFull)**
for PR 12935 at commit
[`ef6399a`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#discussion_r62969204
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ def registerDataFrameAsTable(self, df, tableName):
>>> sqlContext.registe
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218669218
I see. Seems like a API change that at least we need to document.
Is there any performance implication?
also cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218668967
Unlike `CatalystConverter`, `RowEncoder` is stricter about the input
external type, e.g. users must use `Seq` for `ArrayType`, but `CatalystConvert`
also allows `Arra
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#issuecomment-218668485
Looks like a good start. Once you flush this out more, can you print the
generated code ("explain codegen ..."), and do some microbenchmarks similar to
the ones done in th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13071#issuecomment-218668299
**[Test build #58453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58453/consoleFull)**
for PR 13071 at commit
[`274400d`](https://gi
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13071
[SPARK-15281][PySpark][ML][TRIVIAL] Add impurity param to GBTRegressor
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add impurity param to GBTRegressor and mark the of the models &
Github user bomeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12916#issuecomment-218668164
@srowen sorry for the late reply, I did not notice it. I have run the mvn
dependency:tree and only javax.servlet-api 3.1.0 is listed, so it should be
fine.
---
If your
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12916#discussion_r62968602
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -125,12 +125,17 @@
jetty-servlet
compile
+
+ org.eclipse.jetty
+ jetty-
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r62968394
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -861,11 +861,11 @@ def groupBy(self, *cols):
Each element should be a column name (strin
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62968274
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -1117,6 +1137,56 @@ def getBlockSize(self):
"""
return self.getOrDefault(self.b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218666897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218666896
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218666803
**[Test build #58442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58442/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
[`5f83dbd`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218665830
what is the cause of those failed tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218665542
Merging into master 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-21866
yea, the new commit should fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218665223
legitimate issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r62967194
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -861,11 +861,11 @@ def groupBy(self, *cols):
Each element should be a column name (string)
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675#issuecomment-218664815
@holdenk I checked the ScalaDoc and removed the evaluate method. Thanks for
pointing it out. Can you please help review
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218664669
**[Test build #58450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58450/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`7419a52`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218664688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218664687
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r62966720
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -861,11 +861,11 @@ def groupBy(self, *cols):
Each element should be a column name (strin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-218663500
**[Test build #58452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58452/consoleFull)**
for PR 12655 at commit
[`3ceb4d5`](https://gi
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-218663123
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62966384
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -1117,6 +1137,56 @@ def getBlockSize(self):
"""
return self.getOrDefault(self.bl
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r62966223
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -861,11 +861,11 @@ def groupBy(self, *cols):
Each element should be a column name (string)
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#issuecomment-218662623
@yhuai @cloud-fan Sure. I will change it only for typed aggregation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218662389
**[Test build #58451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58451/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`0915a71`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218662174
Sure, will do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218661961
Other examples include:
1. Just say "created", and not "created time". same thing with "last
access" vs "last access time".
2. schema string can probably be a
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#issuecomment-218661443
How about we just improve the column name of fields generated by typed
aggregation. Seems we are also changing other cases?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218661395
True. We can exclude all the variables with undefined values. It could be
much shorter. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218661393
**[Test build #58450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58450/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`7419a52`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218661259
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218661260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218661211
**[Test build #58446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58446/consoleFull)**
for PR 13050 at commit
[`f8d51b9`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218661098
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-218661110
LGTM pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#discussion_r62965499
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext {
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070#issuecomment-218660960
This seems way too verbose for end users. Can't we make something more
readable in the plan?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-218660928
**[Test build #58449 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58449/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`a9bdd5b`](https://gi
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13045#discussion_r62965291
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -861,11 +861,11 @@ def groupBy(self, *cols):
Each element should be a column name (strin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-218660437
**[Test build #58448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58448/consoleFull)**
for PR 12627 at commit
[`1b04840`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-218660446
**[Test build #58447 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58447/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
[`c3748ba`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218660436
**[Test build #58446 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58446/consoleFull)**
for PR 13050 at commit
[`f8d51b9`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-218660355
test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-218660336
Sorry there was a build break in master.
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-218660290
@hvanhovell Could you check if the latest changes resolve all your
comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#discussion_r62965137
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLConte
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13050#issuecomment-218660156
LGTM, but let's retest this please just in case. There have been a lot of
build breaks related to changes like these lately.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-218660173
@andrewor14 @cloud-fan @yhuai This is ready for review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13069#issuecomment-218660020
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13069#issuecomment-218659977
**[Test build #58441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58441/consoleFull)**
for PR 13069 at commit
[`f0a1fd1`](https://g
1 - 100 of 929 matches
Mail list logo
