Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220817564
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13239#discussion_r64145088
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -420,8 +420,11 @@ case class Range(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13239#issuecomment-220817493
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13239#discussion_r64145080
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13239#discussion_r64145075
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -420,8 +420,11 @@ case class Range(
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13250
[SPARK-15471][SQL] ScalaReflection cleanup
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. simplify the logic of deserializing option type.
2. simplify the logic of serializing
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13250#issuecomment-220817334
cc @marmbrus @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13242#discussion_r64144856
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -933,21 +933,20 @@ def getKeepLastCheckpoint(self):
if __name__ == "__main__":
import doctes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220816722
I see. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-220816684
I think maintaining backward compatibility would be useful. Do you have
time to bring this up to date this week so we get it in for 2.0? It's pretty
late for a change of th
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13249
[MINOR] More than 100 chars in line.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
More than 100 chars in line.
## How was this patch tested?
You can merge this pull request
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220816499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220816498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220816493
In this case I guess it is ok though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220816467
I'd like to avoid contaminating RuntimeConfig with private[sql] methods if
possible. Those visibility modifiers have no effect in Java.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220816465
**[Test build #59089 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59089/consoleFull)**
for PR 13095 at commit
[`d7c2420`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13225
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220816386
You are right. Let me add `protected[sql]` before `def set[T](entry:
ConfigEntry[T], value: T): Unit`
https://github.com/gatorsmile/spark/blob/d972e8d8832c5a04d
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13225#issuecomment-220816364
LGTM - merging in master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13209#issuecomment-220816332
LGTM (although you have a few test cases you need to fix).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13209#discussion_r64144707
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -337,6 +341,15 @@ case class BroadcastNestedLoo
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220816173
I don't get it. ConfigEntry is internal to Spark. Why are we exposing that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13239#issuecomment-220816092
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#issuecomment-220816049
This looks good. There are couple minor issues. I will resolve those when I
merge.
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#discussion_r64144657
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -56,30 +61,100 @@ class BroadcastJoinSuite extends Query
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#discussion_r64144623
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220815712
@cloud-fan Based on my understanding, runtime conf (`class RuntimeConfig`)
is designed as the public/external interface for users to access the internal
conf. If use
GitHub user praveendareddy21 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248
[SPARK-15194] [ML] Add Python ML API for MultivariateGaussian
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added MultivariateGaussian in pyspark ML to match scala's ML API
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#issuecomment-220815663
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13243#issuecomment-220815424
The fallback approach doesn't look that simple and clean, can you try split
the generated code like we did in `CreateExternalRow`?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220815210
What's the difference between runtime conf and normal conf?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220814644
Unfortunately, `Dataset` (or `Dataframe`) seems not suitable to achieve the
goal on Python.
```python
>>> spark.parallelize(range(1, 10)).toDS()
...
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220814526
**[Test build #59090 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59090/consoleFull)**
for PR 13247 at commit
[`f443064`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220814528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220814527
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13225#issuecomment-220814492
@rxin @jameszhouyi Do you think the document changes in this PR are clear?
Please let me know if anything is missing or inappropriate. Thanks!
Also CC all th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247#issuecomment-220814370
**[Test build #59090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59090/consoleFull)**
for PR 13247 at commit
[`f443064`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220814326
Thank you, @cloud-fan !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13247
[SPARK-15470] [SQL] Unify the Configuration Interface in SQLContext
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We introduced `RuntimeConfig` in `SQLContext` in the PR
https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12984
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220814047
**[Test build #59089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59089/consoleFull)**
for PR 13095 at commit
[`d7c2420`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13216#issuecomment-220814048
**[Test build #59088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59088/consoleFull)**
for PR 13216 at commit
[`d677105`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12984#issuecomment-220814026
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#issuecomment-220813993
**[Test build #3009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3009/consoleFull)**
for PR 13244 at commit
[`8b9bf51`](https://
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13169#discussion_r64143999
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +353,20 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite extend
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220813962
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13095#issuecomment-220813959
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220813852
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220813851
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220813817
**[Test build #59087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59087/consoleFull)**
for PR 13210 at commit
[`abc12a5`](https://g
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220813421
I see. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13242#issuecomment-220812010
cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#issuecomment-220811992
**[Test build #3009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3009/consoleFull)**
for PR 13244 at commit
[`8b9bf51`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13244#issuecomment-220811981
Looks good at high level. Will take a closer look later!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220811972
hm we are trying to avoid returning rdds in the new apis. one thing we can
do is to introduce a parallelize api that returns dataset?
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13210#issuecomment-220811819
**[Test build #59087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59087/consoleFull)**
for PR 13210 at commit
[`abc12a5`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220811816
Merging in master/2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246#issuecomment-220810589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246#issuecomment-220810588
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246#issuecomment-220810568
**[Test build #59086 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59086/consoleFull)**
for PR 13246 at commit
[`3a57975`](https://g
Github user NarineK closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809739
**[Test build #59082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59082/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`65f9746`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809417
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809418
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220809398
**[Test build #59085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59085/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`4f6a69e`](https://g
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246#discussion_r64142270
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ object IntegerIndex {
* - Unnamed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246#issuecomment-220807733
**[Test build #59086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59086/consoleFull)**
for PR 13246 at commit
[`3a57975`](https://gi
GitHub user bomeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13246
[SPARK-15468] [SQL] some some typos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix some typos while browsing the codes.
## How was this patch tested?
None and obvi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13216#issuecomment-220807530
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13216#issuecomment-220807531
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13216#issuecomment-220807510
**[Test build #59084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59084/consoleFull)**
for PR 13216 at commit
[`c29acae`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13211#discussion_r64142098
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -437,7 +438,9 @@ class ListAccumulator[T] extends AccumulatorV2[T,
java.util.Li
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220806369
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220806446
**[Test build #59085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59085/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`4f6a69e`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220806368
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220806334
**[Test build #59083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59083/consoleFull)**
for PR 13121 at commit
[`5b759da`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220805756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220805754
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220805723
**[Test build #59081 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59081/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`810f08a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13216#issuecomment-220805471
**[Test build #59084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59084/consoleFull)**
for PR 13216 at commit
[`c29acae`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13066
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13066#issuecomment-220805144
Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220804464
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12322#discussion_r64141139
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -620,6 +620,12 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCon
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220803288
**[Test build #59083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59083/consoleFull)**
for PR 13121 at commit
[`5b759da`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220803118
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220802722
**[Test build #59082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59082/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`65f9746`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220801908
**[Test build #59081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59081/consoleFull)**
for PR 13245 at commit
[`810f08a`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245#issuecomment-220801877
Hi, @rxin .
I'm wondering your opinion about this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13245
[SPARK-15466][SQL] Make `SparkSession` as the entry point to programming
with RDD too
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SparkSession` greatly reduces the number of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220801790
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220801786
**[Test build #59080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59080/consoleFull)**
for PR 13121 at commit
[`5b759da`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220801791
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#issuecomment-220801477
**[Test build #59080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59080/consoleFull)**
for PR 13121 at commit
[`5b759da`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13121#discussion_r64140446
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -107,6 +107,53 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Sha
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
