Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
**[Test build #60403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60403/consoleFull)**
for PR 13631 at commit
[`c0500c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#discussion_r66804238
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionState.scala ---
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveSessionState(ctx: SQLCo
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
@kayousterhout sure I'll pull the visibility stuff out.
I did consider trying to do a check on task failure instead. However, I
don't think that is sufficient, because you can have an execut
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#discussion_r66798040
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionState.scala ---
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveSessionState(ctx: SQLCo
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
**[Test build #60405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60405/consoleFull)**
for PR 13618 at commit
[`e309142`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13642
**[Test build #60404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60404/consoleFull)**
for PR 13642 at commit
[`c8850d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13642#discussion_r66793744
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -49,16 +49,6 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends SparkFunSu
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13642
[MINOR] Clean up several build warnings, mostly due to internal use of old
accumulators
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Another PR to clean up recent build warnings. Thi
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13338#discussion_r66793258
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2262,21 +2262,39 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13530
@chenghao-intel can you file a jira with the details on what you are doing
and link to the original jira?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13631
**[Test build #60403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60403/consoleFull)**
for PR 13631 at commit
[`c0500c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60402/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60402/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`9978afa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60401/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`bb43722`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60400/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`3c8be11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60400/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60399/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
**[Test build #60399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60399/consoleFull)**
for PR 13640 at commit
[`6d2580a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60398/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
**[Test build #60398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60398/consoleFull)**
for PR 13618 at commit
[`2692ae3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tilumi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627#discussion_r66780066
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -446,8 +460,14 @@ object NaiveBayes {
/** String name for
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627#discussion_r66779701
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -446,8 +460,14 @@ object NaiveBayes {
/** String name for
Github user tilumi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627#discussion_r66779528
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -446,8 +460,14 @@ object NaiveBayes {
/** String name for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60402/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`9978afa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
cc @yanboliang @srowen @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60401/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`bb43722`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
**[Test build #60400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60400/consoleFull)**
for PR 13641 at commit
[`3c8be11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user MLnick opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13641
[SPARK-10258][DOC][ML] Add @Since annotations to ml.feature
This PR adds missing `@Since` annotations to `ml.feature` package.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
You c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60397/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
**[Test build #60397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60397/consoleFull)**
for PR 13634 at commit
[`2446b37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10806
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60396/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10806
**[Test build #60396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60396/consoleFull)**
for PR 10806 at commit
[`85b4122`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
**[Test build #60399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60399/consoleFull)**
for PR 13640 at commit
[`6d2580a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
I remember this was rewritten by you @viirya. Could you take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13640
[SPARK-15916][SQL] Correctly pushdown top level and operators with
parenthesis in JDBC data source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR insert the correct paren
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
**[Test build #60398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60398/consoleFull)**
for PR 13618 at commit
[`2692ae3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60395/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
**[Test build #60395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60395/consoleFull)**
for PR 13618 at commit
[`2692ae3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13615
@sjjpo2002 not a problem with the change you tried to make, maybe, but your
branching is incorrect.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
**[Test build #60394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60394/consoleFull)**
for PR 13634 at commit
[`b9e90a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user ckadner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6983#discussion_r66765611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,4 +49,41 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite extends Spa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60392/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60392/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
[`91e1944`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60391/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60391/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
[`1aa368d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Thank you always, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
**[Test build #60397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60397/consoleFull)**
for PR 13634 at commit
[`2446b37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634#discussion_r66761760
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/Dispatcher.scala
---
@@ -144,24 +144,21 @@ private[netty] class Dispatcher(nettyEnv:
NettyRpc
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10945
I'd only say it's worth putting in if it's something that users would
cross-validate against (in which case makes more sense to put it into the `ml`
evaluator). But I don't think that's a common case
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mortada commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13639
sure will do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
**[Test build #60389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60389/consoleFull)**
for PR 13638 at commit
[`52641f4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634#discussion_r66757678
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/Dispatcher.scala
---
@@ -144,24 +144,21 @@ private[netty] class Dispatcher(nettyEnv:
NettyRpcEnv) ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10806
**[Test build #60396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60396/consoleFull)**
for PR 10806 at commit
[`85b4122`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13618
**[Test build #60395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60395/consoleFull)**
for PR 13618 at commit
[`2692ae3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13635
**[Test build #60388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60388/consoleFull)**
for PR 13635 at commit
[`107dbef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
**[Test build #60393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60393/consoleFull)**
for PR 13552 at commit
[`8213c98`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60393/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938
**[Test build #60390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60390/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
[`74636b1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60390/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
**[Test build #60394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60394/consoleFull)**
for PR 13634 at commit
[`b9e90a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
**[Test build #60393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60393/consoleFull)**
for PR 13552 at commit
[`8213c98`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60383/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
**[Test build #60383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60383/consoleFull)**
for PR 13634 at commit
[`75a5254`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13552
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60392/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
[`91e1944`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13627#discussion_r66750935
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -446,8 +460,14 @@ object NaiveBayes {
/** String name for
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13639
That's fine, though while you're here can you maybe scan this and related
files for typos in comments, docs?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Thank you for review, @srowen .
Oh, right. That sounds much better to me.
I'll update this PR like that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
**[Test build #60391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60391/consoleFull)**
for PR 12836 at commit
[`1aa368d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938
**[Test build #60390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60390/consoleFull)**
for PR 12938 at commit
[`74636b1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13639
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13634
Do you need the flag anymore? Maybe return an Option with the error instead
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user mortada opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13639
[DOCUMENTATION] fixed typo
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor typo
## How was this patch tested?
minor typo in the doc, should be self explanat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
**[Test build #60389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60389/consoleFull)**
for PR 13638 at commit
[`52641f4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13638
[SPARK-15915][SQL] CacheManager should use canonicalized plan for
planToCache.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DataFrame` with plan overriding `sameResult` but not usin
601 - 700 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
