Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13924
I just merged https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13378
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
looks good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61395/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13378
LGTM
Merging with master
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
**[Test build #61395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61395/consoleFull)**
for PR 13949 at commit
[`8f9c5cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68819144
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +281,96 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunSu
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
And to elaborate, the reason why it is complaining is because the line in
generics.R is the only reference to @rdname write.ml. To fix, you could either
change that to @rdname spark.kmeans (whic
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
I vote for dis-coverability of "write.ml", "predict"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Actually don't do this?
```
#' This is a title for write.ml
#' @rdname write.ml
#' @export
setGeneric("write.ml", function(object, path, ...) {
standardGeneric("write.ml
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13946#discussion_r68816901
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ setMethod("registerTempTable",
#' insertInto
#'
-#' Insert the contents of a Spa
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13946
LGTM
@shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13904
@shivaram I think this will be good to have, just a small change. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61398/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
[`f1ee771`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
**[Test build #61397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61397/consoleFull)**
for PR 13730 at commit
[`7d38003`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
**[Test build #61395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61395/consoleFull)**
for PR 13949 at commit
[`8f9c5cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
**[Test build #61396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61396/consoleFull)**
for PR 13948 at commit
[`2e7b6b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
Not sure if this is something worth squeezing into 2.0, but I thought I'd
patch it now in case.
cc @mengxr @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13949
[SPARK-16261][EXAMPLES][ML] Fixed incorrect appNames in ML Examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some appNames in ML examples are incorrect, mostly in PySpark but
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68811215
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programmin
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68811047
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programmin
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
This LGTM -- just a bunch of cosmetic suggestions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68810277
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +281,96 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends Spa
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68809604
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +281,96 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends Spa
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68809060
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,31 @@ class BlacklistIntegrationSuite extend
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68808784
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,31 @@ class BlacklistIntegrationSuite extend
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68808597
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,31 @@ class BlacklistIntegrationSuite extend
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13860
seems fine to have that method.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68808158
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68808263
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -576,6 +576,61 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
}
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
Hi, All.
The decision points are the followings.
1. Choose one of lowercase `L` or uppercase `I` to disallow as a ScalaStyle.
2. Choose a scope of ScalaStyle excluded files:
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68807958
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -576,6 +576,61 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61393/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61385/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
**[Test build #61393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61393/consoleFull)**
for PR 13947 at commit
[`6b86b69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61385/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
[`60cd959`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
**[Test build #61394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61394/consoleFull)**
for PR 13948 at commit
[`2e7b6b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61384/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68804577
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ import
org.apache.spark.scheduler.SchedulingMod
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
**[Test build #61384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61384/consoleFull)**
for PR 13775 at commit
[`4c14278`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
**[Test build #61392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61392/consoleFull)**
for PR 13948 at commit
[`c3142b1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
**[Test build #61393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61393/consoleFull)**
for PR 13947 at commit
[`6b86b69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
[SPARK-16259] [PYSPARK] cleanup options in DataFrame read/write API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some duplicated code for options in DataFrame reader/writer
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13948
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13884
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
**[Test build #61389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61389/consoleFull)**
for PR 13816 at commit
[`fb491c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943
how about we close this pr since https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13306
has been merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61388/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
[`6fa1b60`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
**[Test build #61391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61391/consoleFull)**
for PR 13730 at commit
[`7d38003`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this `OptimizeIn` PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61390/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
[`f1ee771`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
GitHub user briuri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13947
[SPARK-16257] [Build] Update spark_ec2.py to support Spark 1.6.2 and 1.6.3.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Adds 1.6.2 and 1.6.3 as supported Spark versions within the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Hi, @cloud-fan and @yhuai .
I added more description about the logic. I hope that makes the intention
of this PR more clear.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61386/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
**[Test build #61389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61389/consoleFull)**
for PR 13816 at commit
[`fb491c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
**[Test build #61386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61386/consoleFull)**
for PR 13939 at commit
[`2639644`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
**[Test build #61388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61388/consoleFull)**
for PR 13921 at commit
[`6fa1b60`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765#discussion_r68794253
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -537,12 +537,19 @@ object CollapseProject extends
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
oh I see, thanks a lot
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61383/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61383/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
[`4c00bb1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68792373
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68792300
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68792137
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68789246
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68791843
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68790342
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #61387 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61387/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`c73e905`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68790047
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68790860
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68790649
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765#discussion_r68790432
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -537,12 +537,19 @@ object CollapseProject extends
Github user vlad17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778#discussion_r68789054
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -349,11 +349,12 @@ object MapObjects {
de
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13945#discussion_r68790090
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Structured Streaming Programm
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
downgrading to a WIP as to work reliably it needs
[HADOOP-12636](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12636) on the
hadoop code else the presence of `hadoop-aws.jar` on the CP without
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765#discussion_r68788331
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -537,12 +537,19 @@ object CollapseProject extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765#discussion_r68787810
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -537,12 +537,19 @@ object CollapseProject extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
**[Test build #61386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61386/consoleFull)**
for PR 13939 at commit
[`2639644`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760
@felixcheung , I've addressed the comments or put a comment for the
non-addressed ones.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61385 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61385/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
[`60cd959`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61381/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
501 - 600 of 773 matches
Mail list logo
