Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63023/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #63023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63023/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`0fc02f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72877149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
v
Github user ckadner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398#discussion_r72876907
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -875,11 +877,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
v
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14346
cc: @junyangq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
**[Test build #63022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63022/consoleFull)**
for PR 14355 at commit
[`2b2d59e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63022/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14415
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user lovexi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14415
[SPARK-16810] Refactor registerSinks with multiple constructos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For some metrics, it may require some **app detailed information** from
`S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63020/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
**[Test build #63020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63020/consoleFull)**
for PR 14413 at commit
[`0abbd91`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
cc @skonto. This somewhat relates to your work on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13401, but it seems to be disjoint.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
**[Test build #63027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63027/consoleFull)**
for PR 14414 at commit
[`6e97ec1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
[SPARK-16809] enable history server links in dispatcher UI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Links the Spark Mesos Dispatcher UI to the history server UI
- adds
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
**[Test build #83 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/83/consoleFull)**
for PR 40 at commit
[`fb4eee1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63018/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332
**[Test build #63018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63018/consoleFull)**
for PR 14332 at commit
[`3a5c5a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63026/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63026/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
[`4dbd5fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389
**[Test build #3196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14389 at commit
[`b9f94fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14110
**[Test build #3197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14110 at commit
[`97b6fcc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
**[Test build #63025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63025/consoleFull)**
for PR 14410 at commit
[`f4f383c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63026/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
[`4dbd5fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
It sounds great to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
**[Test build #63024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63024/consoleFull)**
for PR 14396 at commit
[`9aa32b3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r72871806
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/IsotonicRegressionWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37
**[Test build #82 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/82/consoleFull)**
for PR 37 at commit
[`da20b37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/da
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63019/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
**[Test build #63019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63019/consoleFull)**
for PR 14410 at commit
[`724fcf8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571#discussion_r72871316
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1731,13 +1749,115 @@ def sort_array(col, asc=True):
# User Defined F
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
Two good cases, which return the same result set, with and without this
proposed fix:
sql("select c1 from t1 where exists (select 1 from t2 where t1.c1=t2.c2)
and exists (select 1 from t2 LIM
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571#discussion_r72870886
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1731,13 +1749,115 @@ def sort_array(col, asc=True):
# User Defined
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
@gatorsmile: thanks. I will add them in SubquerySuite.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
I think the positive cases can move here.
`sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
I include two examples of "good" case in the JIRA to show that this fix
only blocks cases where Spark will produce incorrect results. I need to find a
place to host those "good" cases. Don't think Ana
Github user ckadner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
@holdenk @davies
I agree that date, time, and timezone handling is best left to the experts
and leveraging [JSR-310](http://www.threeten.org/threetenbp/)
([SPARK-16788](https://issues.apache.org
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r72870009
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -292,6 +299,77 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = aprior
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407#discussion_r72869004
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/FaultToleranceTest.scala ---
@@ -113,7 +112,7 @@ private object FaultToleranceTest extends App with
Lo
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407#discussion_r72868911
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/StatusTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -61,29 +60,29 @@ class StatusTrackerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Matchers
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407#discussion_r72868695
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRank.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ object PageRank extends Logging {
require(resetPro
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407#discussion_r72868538
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/FaultToleranceTest.scala ---
@@ -113,7 +112,7 @@ private object FaultToleranceTest extends App with
Log
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407#discussion_r72868588
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/StatusTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -61,29 +60,29 @@ class StatusTrackerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Matchers w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
**[Test build #63022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63022/consoleFull)**
for PR 14355 at commit
[`2b2d59e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #63023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63023/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`0fc02f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63021/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
[`b264f2d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63021/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
Rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
**[Test build #63021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63021/consoleFull)**
for PR 14407 at commit
[`b264f2d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Did a first pass audit, leaving XML parsing alone for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
**[Test build #63020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63020/consoleFull)**
for PR 14413 at commit
[`0abbd91`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14413
[SPARK-16805][SQL] Log timezone when query result does not match
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is useful to log the timezone when query result does not match,
especially o
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
We also need more test cases to prove it work as expected.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14412
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
@nsyca Could you update the PR description? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user shubhamchopra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14412
[SPARK-15355] [CORE] [WIP] Proactive block replication
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We are proposing addition of pro-active block replication in case of
execut
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user nsyca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
[SPARK-16804][SQL] Correlated subqueries containing LIMIT return incorrect
results
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
**[Test build #63019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63019/consoleFull)**
for PR 14410 at commit
[`724fcf8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
cc @yhuai @rxin @liancheng @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410
[SPARK-16803] [SQL] SaveAsTable does not work when source DataFrame is
built on a Hive Table
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.0, `SaveAsTable` does not work wh
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63017/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
**[Test build #63017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63017/consoleFull)**
for PR 14406 at commit
[`f6771fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14408
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389
**[Test build #3196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14389 at commit
[`b9f94fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14408
Merging in master/2.0.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
**[Test build #63017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63017/consoleFull)**
for PR 14406 at commit
[`f6771fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332
**[Test build #63018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63018/consoleFull)**
for PR 14332 at commit
[`3a5c5a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402#discussion_r72859935
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaSparkContextVarargsWorkaround.java
---
@@ -52,11 +46,16 @@ public JavaDoubleRDD union(JavaDoubleRD
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14389
I ran the Python tests locally and they passed. It looks like the failure
was caused by the Jenkins shutdown.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14232
Hm, not sure what to do here. Unless we can get an informed double-check on
the correctness of this, I think I'd just not do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user Devian-ua commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409
@ajbozarth What if some property will be be intoruduced containing
"password" in its name, but not having password in its value?
@dongjoon-hyun I can change it to Set.
---
If your projec
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409
All in all I think this looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user sylvinus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14373
For reference, I have found another similar issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16802
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409
I'd say that that a property like that was poorly named, but it is still a
valid possibility so leaving it as you have it is probably better
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
I'm totally down with removing the others - I'll go through and remove the
whitelisting in the places where it doesn't add much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14308#discussion_r72857036
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaWord2VecExample.java ---
@@ -55,10 +56,14 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409#discussion_r72856642
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/env/EnvironmentPage.scala
---
@@ -25,12 +25,20 @@ import org.apache.spark.ui.{UIUtils, WebUIPage}
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14405
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
Oh, I thought the idea here was to un-whitelist most or all other
occurrences. They're "whitelisted" just because they existed and were causing
warnings, but most are probably not really good usages
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406#discussion_r72855603
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLC
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409#discussion_r72855418
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/env/EnvironmentPage.scala
---
@@ -25,12 +25,20 @@ import org.apache.spark.ui.{UIUtils, WebUIPage}
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14404
You can close this PR now; we can't auto-close it and neither can the bot
in this situation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14404
Great, thank you @breakdawn . It looks good as a re-submit of the original
PR, and passes, so I'm merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396#discussion_r72854729
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1430,14 +1430,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with Ex
GitHub user Devian-ua opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14409
[SPARK-16796] [Web UI] Visible passwords on Spark environment page
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mask spark.ssl.keyPassword, spark.ssl.keyStorePassword,
spark.ssl.t
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14408
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14393#discussion_r72853914
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -226,28 +226,34 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None):
from ``data
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14408
[SPARK-16772] Restore "datatype string" to Python API docstrings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects [an error made in an earlier
PR](https://github.com/a
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14407
[SPARK-16779][TRIVIAL][WIP] Avoid using postfix operator for command
execution in SQLQuerySuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid using postfix operation for comman
101 - 200 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
