Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73994581
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ class Analyzer(
c
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522#discussion_r73994436
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -771,6 +771,10 @@ setGeneric("over", function(x, window) {
standardGeneric("over") })
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63404/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
do you know why we put comment in table properties instead of table comment
field? Some hive tricks?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
**[Test build #63404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63404/consoleFull)**
for PR 14552 at commit
[`a19cec7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550#discussion_r73994067
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
sql(s"CRE
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73993906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63402/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
**[Test build #63402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63402/consoleFull)**
for PR 10846 at commit
[`b23ddc5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
The change here does not really affect serialization. Spark automatically
broadcasts the coefficients each time calculate is called before, and marking
it as a broadcast variable explicitly won't lik
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73993189
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
We can create a new rule for this kind of check and put it only in sql
module, i.e. `SessionState`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73992751
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class PreWriteCheck(con
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63391/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
**[Test build #63391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63391/consoleFull)**
for PR 14549 at commit
[`5da8db6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13907
I don't think it's a very useful feature, and we may surprise users as they
do use hive syntax to specify row format.
For advanced users, they can easily use `USING xxx` to explicitly crea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63401/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
[`7386ed6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14180
ping @Stibbons Any updates ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
cc/ @srowen Is this OK?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73991594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class PreWriteCheck(co
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73991551
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #63407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63407/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
[`cfaee0f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user vlad17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
@sethah Thanks for the FYI. I'm pretty confident that it'll help since now
we're directly optimizing the loss function. However, it would be nice to prove
this. Unfortunately, the example I linked ab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63398/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63396/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63398/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
[`12bd144`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
**[Test build #63396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63396/consoleFull)**
for PR 14511 at commit
[`d6c25f0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73990892
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
super cool, thanks @mgummelt !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73990474
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ class Analyzer(
case
GitHub user frreiss opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
[WIP] [SPARK-16963] Initial version of changes to Source trait
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Initial proposed changes to the Source trait such that the scheduler can
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
cc @cloud-fan . This is a tiny fix. Could you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14518
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63393/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14538
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14538
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
**[Test build #63393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63393/consoleFull)**
for PR 14531 at commit
[`8434777`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14538
**[Test build #63394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63394/consoleFull)**
for PR 14538 at commit
[`247a93d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63406/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
[`8e1600e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14518
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63397/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14518
**[Test build #63397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63397/consoleFull)**
for PR 14518 at commit
[`e4d6999`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user xwu0226 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14509
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
@rajeshbalamohan can you also update the PR title and summary? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
@MLnick
The main improvement here is about `localFeaturesStd`,
in previous code, each calling on `CostFun.calculate` will do a
serialization and broadcast on vector.
mark `localFeat
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
cc @drcrallen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
[SPARK-16952] don't lookup spark home directory when executor uri is set
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove requirement to set spark.mesos.executor.home when spark.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
**[Test build #63404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63404/consoleFull)**
for PR 14552 at commit
[`a19cec7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #63405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63405/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
[`71df428`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #63399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63399/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`a3f5bb5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14542#discussion_r73987834
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -404,7 +410,8 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63403/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
[`1e9053a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63399/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63403/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63403/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
[`1e9053a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73986950
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class PreWriteCheck(con
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63400/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
**[Test build #63400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63400/consoleFull)**
for PR 14534 at commit
[`592d817`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r73985582
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -292,6 +299,83 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63392/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
**[Test build #63392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63392/consoleFull)**
for PR 14550 at commit
[`e546af5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
**[Test build #63402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63402/consoleFull)**
for PR 10846 at commit
[`b23ddc5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r73984871
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -292,6 +299,83 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Sure, will do it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
They take longer to clean up. If queries are executed continuously, major
portion of thrift server wastes time in GC-ing.
IAC, I have removed the HadoopRDD in the recent commit and c
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73984812
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class PreWriteCheck(co
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Can we improve the class doc for `CreateTableLikeCommand` to explain the
expected semantic? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user nicklavers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
Thanks @HyukjinKwon!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63401/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
[`7386ed6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user sarutak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13738
@tgravescs No problem. Have a nice vacation :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
**[Test build #63400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63400/consoleFull)**
for PR 14534 at commit
[`592d817`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63390/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522#discussion_r73983727
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -771,6 +771,10 @@ setGeneric("over", function(x, window) {
standardGeneric("over") })
##
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
**[Test build #63390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63390/consoleFull)**
for PR 12990 at commit
[`593b294`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14489
@shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
Hi, @nicklavers, just in case you might not know, fixing the title such as
`[SPARK-16961][CORE] ...` will automatically add the link of this PR to the
JIRA as described in
https://cwiki.apache
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522#discussion_r73983612
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -771,6 +771,10 @@ setGeneric("over", function(x, window) {
standardGeneric("over") })
##
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r73983532
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -292,6 +299,83 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14218
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r73983398
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +80,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14218
Merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #63399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63399/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`a3f5bb5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14509
Thank you for all your comments as well. Maybe we can close this if you
think this is not an issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r73982911
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1192,8 +1192,8 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQ
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r73982800
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/PlanParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -424,19 +424,26 @@ class PlanParserSuite extends P
101 - 200 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
