Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63819/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626
**[Test build #63819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63819/consoleFull)**
for PR 14626 at commit
[`2723eca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74871845
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
return(dataFrame(callJMethod(obj
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Thank you, @nsyca!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
Thanks for the review @JoshRosen, I made the requested changes and tested
it out once more. I think it is low risk because it is pretty well isolated to
this particular issue and only improves
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Hmm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Yep. Here is the output.
```scala
scala> val a = Seq((1,2),(2,3)).toDF("a","b").createOrReplaceTempView("A")
scala> val b = Seq((2,5),(3,4)).toDF("a","c").createOrReplaceTempView("B"
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74870955
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
return(dataFrame(callJMethod(o
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74870995
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
return(dataFrame(callJMethod(o
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
@dongjoon-hyun, could you please try this on your PR?
val a = Seq((1,2),(2,3)).toDF("a","b").createOrReplaceTempView("A")
val b = Seq((2,5),(3,4)).toDF("a","c").createOrReplaceTemp
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447#discussion_r74870693
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -414,6 +421,94 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
return(dataFrame(callJMethod(o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626
**[Test build #63819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63819/consoleFull)**
for PR 14626 at commit
[`2723eca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14641
I think tests are only passing string, but we should coerce this to be safe.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r74870049
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,110 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r74869983
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,110 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r74869872
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -526,6 +533,24 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
invisibl
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r74869843
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1279,6 +1279,13 @@ setGeneric("spark.naiveBayes", function(data,
formula, ...) { standardGeneric("s
#' @export
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74869802
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14506
**[Test build #63818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63818/consoleFull)**
for PR 14506 at commit
[`3042af2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
you can take a look at `GenerateUnsafeProjection`, if the `ArrayData` is
already an unsafe array, we will copy it directly, no iteration is needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74869681
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -605,6 +701,69 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
retu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63817/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63817/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`f5af081`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74869578
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -605,6 +701,69 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
retu
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74869532
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -605,6 +701,69 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
retu
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14506
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63817/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`f5af081`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f5a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74869399
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63814/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63814/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
[`4d94ac0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63812/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74868660
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1279,6 +1279,19 @@ setGeneric("spark.naiveBayes", function(data,
formula, ...) { standardGeneric("s
#' @export
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
**[Test build #63812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63812/consoleFull)**
for PR 13428 at commit
[`df1ac92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r74868483
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,159 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r74868437
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,159 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656#discussion_r74868227
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveTableValuedFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74868095
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63816/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`0cb8fee`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63816/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63816/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`0cb8fee`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0cb
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r74867735
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,159 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r74867708
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,159 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object
Github user sun-rui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
has this change be documented to spark on mesos guide?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74866841
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
@dongjoon-hyun, My apologies on the terse comment I put in previously.
There is nothing wrong with the ```full outer join``` with ```using``` What I
tried to explain is the ```using``` is a synta
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14657
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63811/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14657
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14657
**[Test build #63811 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63811/consoleFull)**
for PR 14657 at commit
[`6576496`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626#discussion_r74866185
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -152,9 +146,9 @@ setGeneric("getNumPartitions", function(x) {
standardGeneric("getNumPartitions")
# @export
se
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r74866111
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -533,6 +628,24 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
invisibl
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14626#discussion_r74865876
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -152,9 +146,9 @@ setGeneric("getNumPartitions", function(x) {
standardGeneric("getNumPartitions")
# @export
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14648
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63810/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63810/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
[`78c9f05`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74865027
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74864994
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229#discussion_r74864948
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +307,92 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r74864827
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -533,6 +628,24 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
invisibl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63809/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63809 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63809/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
[`8517d71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r74863441
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -533,6 +628,24 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"KMeansModel", path = "character"),
invisibl
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14481
@hvanhovell thanks very much for the advice, yes, I will post the benchmark
results first.
And it is WIP, I will post a generated codes, but kindly not review the
codes details at present, I am pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14506
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63808/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14506
**[Test build #63808 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63808/consoleFull)**
for PR 14506 at commit
[`3042af2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63815/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
**[Test build #63815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63815/consoleFull)**
for PR 7625 at commit
[`d1d3d53`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
**[Test build #63815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63815/consoleFull)**
for PR 7625 at commit
[`d1d3d53`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d1d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63814/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
[`4d94ac0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656#discussion_r74861427
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -122,6 +122,44 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
**[Test build #63813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63813/consoleFull)**
for PR 7625 at commit
[`7664e37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/76
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63813/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182#discussion_r74861441
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -299,6 +308,91 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
return(list(apriori = apr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
**[Test build #63813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63813/consoleFull)**
for PR 7625 at commit
[`7664e37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/766
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63807/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63807 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63807/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
[`1f81b97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user JoshRosen reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7625
[WIP] [skip ci] Fuzz testing in Spark SQL
[skip ci]
This is a WIP pull request for some expression fuzz testing code that I'm
working on as part of a
hackathon. I'm creating this
Github user andreweduffy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14649#discussion_r74860656
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -703,6 +703,16 @@ class ParquetQuer
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656#discussion_r74860010
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveTableValuedFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656#discussion_r74859905
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -653,6 +653,19 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBaseVisit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
**[Test build #63812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63812/consoleFull)**
for PR 13428 at commit
[`df1ac92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Maybe we could move the shared code `MultiClassSummarizer`,
`LogisticAggregator` and `LogisticCostFun` into
`LogisticRegressionUtils.scala`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14631
Hi, @davies .
Could you review this PR about `Timestamp precision` again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r74859089
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,626 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63805/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR about `PushDownPredicate`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
**[Test build #63805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63805/consoleFull)**
for PR 14433 at commit
[`80914e2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14580
Could you give us some examples we miss incorrectly here? We had better
discuss on more concrete examples for other audiences.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user tedyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14568
@hvanhovell
As Martin said in JIRA:
* Add the index column to A' - this time starting at 200, as there are
already entries with id's from 0 to 199 (here, monotonicallyInreasingID( 200 )
101 - 200 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
