Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
**[Test build #63778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63778/consoleFull)**
for PR 14520 at commit
[`e7ff240`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74729028
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1251,10 +1311,57 @@ setGeneric("year", function(x) {
standardGeneric("year") })
#' @export
setGeneric("spark.
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74728822
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1277,8 +1384,11 @@ setGeneric("spark.naiveBayes", function(data,
formula, ...) { standardGeneric("s
#' @rdna
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74728351
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -142,15 +143,6 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
#' Generalized Linea
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Actually I think it might be able to remove this assert...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
**[Test build #63773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63773/consoleFull)**
for PR 14642 at commit
[`cf4387a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74727208
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -602,14 +599,14 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
# Returns a summar
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r74726485
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -930,10 +942,8 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary
pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
@WeichenXu123 would you mind updating the title of the JIRA and PR, as well
as the description, to reflect the fact that this is not actually affecting
serialization, but more to update the approach
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520#discussion_r74726107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1071,24 +1074,23 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620#discussion_r74725943
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -61,5 +88,39 @@ class ParserUtilsSuite extends
501 - 514 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
