Github user mortada commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12229
@rxin so it seems like `DirectParquetOutputCommitter` has been removed with
Spark 2.0, is there a recommended replacement?
(I'm in the process of migrating form Spark 1.6 to 2.0)
---
If y
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
**[Test build #64237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64237/consoleFull)**
for PR 14759 at commit
[`5df8936`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64237/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64236/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64236/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
[`8740e76`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
@hvanhovell Will submit a PR for Spark 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64233/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`56b8cef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
The changes look reasonable. We just need to completely remove them from
the code base.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698
@lw-lin this looks pretty good. I have left a few comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64230/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698#discussion_r75762666
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ trait ExpressionEvalHe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
**[Test build #64230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64230/consoleFull)**
for PR 14724 at commit
[`c47635a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
Would it be useful to pick out the specific errors and warnings?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698#discussion_r75762228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -474,6 +474,20 @@ case class MapObjects priv
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698#discussion_r75762055
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -474,6 +474,20 @@ case class MapObjects priv
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698#discussion_r75761961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -474,6 +474,20 @@ case class MapObjects priv
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13867
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14707
**[Test build #64239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64239/consoleFull)**
for PR 14707 at commit
[`2b65086`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14707
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14661
@nsyca `filter.constraints` is not a superset of `filter.conditions`. We
are doing the same in the rule `InferFiltersFromConstraints`:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
@yanboliang Sorry for the wrong delay! Hope you are still here.
1. The term variance in predictions is ambiguous and a bit misleading. Let
us say that we have the original data generating
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13867
@hvanhovell I rebased my changes to the latest build. Please take a look.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r75759665
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -75,18 +81,52 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14661
cc @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #64238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64238/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
[`00075f9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759#discussion_r75758514
--- Diff: R/run-tests.sh ---
@@ -26,14 +26,30 @@ rm -f $LOGFILE
SPARK_TESTING=1 $FWDIR/../bin/spark-submit --driver-java-options
"-Dlog4j.configuration
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
**[Test build #64237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64237/consoleFull)**
for PR 14759 at commit
[`5df8936`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
**[Test build #64236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64236/consoleFull)**
for PR 14761 at commit
[`8740e76`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759#discussion_r75758122
--- Diff: R/run-tests.sh ---
@@ -26,14 +26,30 @@ rm -f $LOGFILE
SPARK_TESTING=1 $FWDIR/../bin/spark-submit --driver-java-options
"-Dlog4j.configuration
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14761
[SparkR][Minor] Add installation message for remote master mode and improve
other messages
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to give informative message to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14311
**[Test build #64235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64235/consoleFull)**
for PR 14311 at commit
[`8ed8fb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64231/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64231/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`3d2d87a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Please see the changes I have listed above for details - you will see that
they are either removed or moved to mllib.R
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572#discussion_r75754936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -72,29 +72,19 @@ case class PreprocessDDL(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14760
**[Test build #64234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64234/consoleFull)**
for PR 14760 at commit
[`5d85b8b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64226/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #64226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64226/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
[`e2677da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14760
[SPARK-17193] [CORE] HadoopRDD NPE at DEBUG log level when getLocationInfo
== null
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handle null from Hadoop getLocationInfo directly inste
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64225/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
**[Test build #64225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64225/consoleFull)**
for PR 14572 at commit
[`a9c94ea`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64233/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`56b8cef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14755
lgtm. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
cc @cloud-fan @rxin @yhuai @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64229/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #64229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64229/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
[`8eb8e71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64228/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
**[Test build #64228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64228/consoleFull)**
for PR 14759 at commit
[`96216ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
**[Test build #64232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64232/consoleFull)**
for PR 14724 at commit
[`04744fc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
Updated, ptal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
hi @felixcheung, after I merge master in, I found that `spark.kmeans`,
`spark.naiveBayes`, `spark.survreg`, `spark.isoreg` don't have the `#' @param
... Additional parameters ...
`.
https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64222/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #64231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64231/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`3d2d87a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14724
**[Test build #64230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64230/consoleFull)**
for PR 14724 at commit
[`c47635a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757
**[Test build #64222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64222/consoleFull)**
for PR 14757 at commit
[`f63826e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14758
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759#discussion_r75746613
--- Diff: R/run-tests.sh ---
@@ -26,14 +26,30 @@ rm -f $LOGFILE
SPARK_TESTING=1 $FWDIR/../bin/spark-submit --driver-java-options
"-Dlog4j.configurat
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759#discussion_r75746364
--- Diff: R/run-tests.sh ---
@@ -26,14 +26,30 @@ rm -f $LOGFILE
SPARK_TESTING=1 $FWDIR/../bin/spark-submit --driver-java-options
"-Dlog4j.configurat
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14758
Merging to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #64229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64229/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
[`8eb8e71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14759
**[Test build #64228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64228/consoleFull)**
for PR 14759 at commit
[`96216ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
sure, will rebase
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #64227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64227/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
[`2e8c191`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64227/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14756
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64221/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14756
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
@shivaram @sun-rui thought?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14756
**[Test build #64221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64221/consoleFull)**
for PR 14756 at commit
[`d600e68`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572#discussion_r75743457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -72,29 +72,19 @@ case class PreprocessDDL(conf: SQLConf) exten
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Hi there - sorry about the delay. Could you please rebase to master and
check out the refactoring
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0583ecda1b63a7e3f126c3276059e4f99548a741)
and doc
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14734#discussion_r75741610
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3058,7 +3057,7 @@ setMethod("str",
#' @note drop since 2.0.0
setMethod("drop",
signature(x
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14758
LGTM. I guess I should upgrade me spam filter then ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #64227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64227/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
[`2e8c191`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64220/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14755
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14755
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64219/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #64220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64220/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
[`f8b1bff`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14755
**[Test build #64219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64219/consoleFull)**
for PR 14755 at commit
[`ea2d0cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64217/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14754
**[Test build #64217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64217/consoleFull)**
for PR 14754 at commit
[`8ae3789`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64218/
Test PASSed.
---
301 - 400 of 757 matches
Mail list logo
