Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64209/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75694390
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -19,34 +19,90 @@ package
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75693169
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/Aggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75692369
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/Aggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
**[Test build #64208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64208/consoleFull)**
for PR 14738 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64201/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hqzizania commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
Fixed. Thanks for the reviews.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
**[Test build #64201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14745 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64200/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64200/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user andreweduffy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671
cc @davies @cloud-fan for parquet change, seems I got @rdblue's stamp of
approval
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
@hvanhovell fixed. plz check again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user andreweduffy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14649
cc @davies @cloud-fan as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user hqzizania commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75689943
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -171,14 +180,47 @@ object ChiSqSelectorModel extends
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
Right, for Parquet this could be part of initial codebase (from Spark-1251
I believe) which merges any metastore conflicts with parq files. But in the
case of ORC, this inference is still
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64207/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64207/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
LGTM except the last minor issue. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64207/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user hqzizania commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75689230
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -171,14 +180,47 @@ object ChiSqSelectorModel extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738#discussion_r75689013
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +154,11 @@ private[shared] object
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75688342
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AggregateWithObjectAggregateBufferSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64202/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #64206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64206/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13320
@rxin could you give me comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user WeichenXu123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14629
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
@steveloughran Thank for the comment and good suggestion. Seems you'd
better off opening a new JIRA ticket to discuss more there. btw, do you know
how the recursion you pointed out makes big impacts
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64199/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64205/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
**[Test build #64205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64205/consoleFull)**
for PR 14752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64199/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
**[Test build #64205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64205/consoleFull)**
for PR 14752 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
cc @yhuai @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
**[Test build #64203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14738 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64203/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14752
[SPARK-17186][SQL] remove catalog table type INDEX
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Actually Spark SQL doesn't support index, the catalog table type `INDEX` is
from
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14718
No, it all gets including into one assembly jar used by the nodemanagers
(/spark-${project.version}-yarn-shuffle.jar)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14751
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64204/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14751
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14751
**[Test build #64204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14751 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14751
**[Test build #64204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14751 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64190/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14751
[WIP][SPARK-17184][[CORE]]Replace ByteBuf with InputStream
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The size of ByteBuf can not be greater than 2G, should be replaced by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
**[Test build #64190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64189/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14567
**[Test build #64189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64189/consoleFull)**
for PR 14567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64191/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64191/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
**[Test build #64203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14738 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14749
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14749
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64195/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14749
**[Test build #64195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64195/consoleFull)**
for PR 14749 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
any more thought? I'd like to merge to facilitate more R mllib work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
ah, thanks for running the tests. yea, I don't think we fare well on
Windows.
I don't know if the Spark Jenkins support Windows or that we check it works
before releasing.
We
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Hm, yea, I think we should take that into account as
`spark.sql.caseSensitive` is `false` by default. I will take a look at R as
well and will fix this up tomorrow. Thank you for reviewing
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
cc @yhuai @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user pwoody commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14733#discussion_r75672675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -125,12 +129,37 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
[Here](https://gist.github.com/HyukjinKwon/4a7e0848173d045fd6faf3e3030f62db)
before this PR and
[here](https://gist.github.com/HyukjinKwon/1a5be83ae77633550e2ab15a2f6883a3)
after this PR. It
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
[SPARK-17183][SQL] put hive serde table schema to table properties like
data source table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For data source tables, we will put its
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64200/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
@hvanhovell as I know, a temporary table will be resolved as arbitrary
logical plan, instead of `LeafNode` that the statistics of a query plan is
based on. I think it will cause problem, doesn't it?
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
looks good to me.
do we need to consider case? is "a1" the same as "A1"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
**[Test build #64201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14745 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745#discussion_r75671454
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -57,28 +57,45 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
**[Test build #64197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14747 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64197/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745#discussion_r75671104
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -57,28 +57,45 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75670619
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,87 @@ import
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75670643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,87 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64198/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
**[Test build #64198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14735 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14666
Does this work with Spark Standalone?
"yarn-client" is actually deprecated:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64193/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #64193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64193/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64199/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75666478
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/PlannerSuite.scala ---
@@ -37,36 +37,58 @@ class PlannerSuite extends SharedSQLContext {
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75666430
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -121,3 +121,6 @@ case class SortAggregateExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735
**[Test build #64198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14735 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64192/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64188/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688
**[Test build #64192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64192/consoleFull)**
for PR 14688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64194/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14688
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
501 - 600 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
