Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Thanks a lot for adding me as âcontributorâ in Hadoop :) @steveloughran
@cnauroth
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14692
thanks, merging to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Hi, @steveloughran Thanks a lot for the comments.
In the audit log, if users set some configuration in spark-defaults.conf
like `spark.eventLog.dir hdfs://localhost:9000/spark-history`,
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744#discussion_r75633858
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1752,6 +1752,15 @@ showDF(properties, numRows = 200, truncate = FALSE)
Executable for executing R scripts
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
No, my question is whether it remains sorted after `.distinct`. We'd need
that, but I'm not sure it's guaranteed. It's easy to add `.sorted` to guarantee
it.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738#discussion_r75633532
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -397,13 +397,13 @@ private[ml] trait HasAggregationDepth
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#discussion_r75633544
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -788,6 +788,8 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
**[Test build #64184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64184/consoleFull)**
for PR 14747 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75633327
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -200,22 +375,77 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738#discussion_r75633356
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -167,11 +173,11 @@ private[shared] object
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
yes, the output from approxQuantile is a sorted array.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Hm, does `.distinct` guarantee that the ordering is preserved? It looks
like it generally happens to. I guess we could add `.sorted` to make sure; it
wouldn't be expensive, especially if it's
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14683
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
@davies Would it be possible to share your opinions regarding these design
questions among us?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75632667
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,126 @@ abstract class
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
@liancheng Could you please review this?
cc: @cloud-fan , we are waiting for @liancheng 's review for a long time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14700
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hqzizania commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
It is linked to SPARK-17090 now. @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user VinceShieh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
[SPARK-17086] Fix an issue in QuantileDiscretizer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In cases when QuantileDiscretizerSuite is called upon a numeric array with
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14683
Merged to master as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14700
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64181/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
OK, let's link this to the original JIRA then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #64181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64181/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user winningsix commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r75631172
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/crypto/CryptoConf.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Hi, @cnauroth Thank you very much for the review and suggestion. I have
removed the spaces in the value of the caller context, and prepended "Spark"
instead (refer to the commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
**[Test build #64183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64183/consoleFull)**
for PR 14537 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
ping @yhuai Any chance you can review this? Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14388
@maver1ck Any results about the test? Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
ping @cloud-fan @JoshRosen since you have modified this file, do you think
this change make sense?
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
@hvanhovell Not related to this PR. But I would like to ask that do we need
to support temporary tables in `ANALYZE TABLE`? Because temporary tables (and
views) are actually represented by logical
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14746
**[Test build #64182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64182/consoleFull)**
for PR 14746 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14746
[SPARK-17180] [SQL] Fix View Resolution Order in ALTER VIEW AS SELECT
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the current master branch, when users do not specify the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #64181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64181/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64177/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
**[Test build #64178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64178/consoleFull)**
for PR 14745 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
**[Test build #64177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64177/consoleFull)**
for PR 14521 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64176/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
**[Test build #64176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14531 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
**[Test build #64180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64180/consoleFull)**
for PR 14723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64180/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64175/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
**[Test build #64175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64175/consoleFull)**
for PR 14572 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
**[Test build #64180 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64180/consoleFull)**
for PR 14723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
**[Test build #64179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64179/consoleFull)**
for PR 14723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64179/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723
**[Test build #64179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64179/consoleFull)**
for PR 14723 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75622311
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +98,21 @@ class
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75622250
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75622002
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AggregateWithObjectAggregateBufferSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
701 - 761 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
