Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64422/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
**[Test build #64423 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64423/consoleFull)**
for PR 14808 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
[SPARK-17156][ML][EXAMPLE] Add multiclass logistic regression Scala Example
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
New example for `MultinomialLogisticRegression` ML
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14579
Looks good to me. ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64421/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r76251185
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +89,70 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r76248746
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +89,70 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r76248301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +89,70 @@ case class
Github user robert3005 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76245512
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* an exception if called
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76244574
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* an exception if called
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64420/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64416/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64416/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
**[Test build #64419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64419/consoleFull)**
for PR 14786 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786#discussion_r76241650
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
**[Test build #64418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64418/consoleFull)**
for PR 14785 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
**[Test build #64417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64417/consoleFull)**
for PR 12374 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777#discussion_r76240220
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -251,8 +251,21 @@ case class Literal (value: Any,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64418/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64413/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64413/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
Github user qualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
@srowen : Thank you! Glad to hear opinions and maybe need more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Hi @dbtsai , PR 2294 added Matrix comparing in TestingUtils, but did not
add any test cases in TestingUtilsSuite. I did not add test cases for Matrix
comparing in the PR either.
If Matrix
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
OK, another config eh. If there's no default change in behavior, and it's
undocumented and it doesn't introduce much complexity, seems OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
I can't evaluate this since I don't use windows, but maybe others who made
the original change can. You should check
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark BTW.
Github user qualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
@srowen : Sorry that there's something misleading in my example about the
--jar.
The key points in short are :
* The double quotes with **spark-submit.cmd** doesn't work** if the full
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
**[Test build #64418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64418/consoleFull)**
for PR 14785 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
@gatorsmile I have merged this PR. The merge script can only close PRs that
are targeted at master. Can you close it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
LGTM - merging to branch-2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user robert3005 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573
@hvanhovell made all the suggested changes. I initially misunderstood what
getByteArrayRdd does. Shuold be good now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
**[Test build #64417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64417/consoleFull)**
for PR 12374 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14661
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14661
LGTM - merging to master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64415/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
**[Test build #64415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64415/consoleFull)**
for PR 14806 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64416/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user robert3005 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76230260
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* an exception if called
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r76230236
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786#discussion_r76230207
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r76229790
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user robert3005 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76229774
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -311,30 +311,32 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r76229814
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702#discussion_r76229653
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/script/ScriptTransformationExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
@srowen Why I set this value 2, because a "JOIN" action needs 2
elements.Because Users always don't care about how many partitions the graphs
has, they just want to know the relations from DAG
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76228058
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* an exception if called on an
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76227923
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -311,30 +311,32 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
I can see the value in this, but it also removes any indication that there
are more elements to the graph that are not displayed. I wonder if there is any
easy way to do that or do I misunderstand?
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76227554
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -311,30 +311,32 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
I see, your example shows, I think, submitting an invalid JAR file right?
you've specified your JAR with --jars but then don't specify a main JAR. That
may be the root cause.
I see
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
I am very sorry about, the first picture is for stage, the second picture
is for job, but it is the same job "select count(1) from partitionedTables "
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
@clockfly is this supposed to work with window functions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r76225656
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,144 @@ abstract class
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14788
NP :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14788
Sorry, it takes a bit longer than I thought I will finish up this within
this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user qualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
And what's more, current `spark-submit.cmd` will cause an extra error of
**"The input line is too long."** if you call `spark-submit.cmd` in an batch
file under some case
```
Pi* d:\tmp
Github user qualiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
@srowen : thanks for your reply.
But as I've mentioned above , path with spaces is not work now:
```
D:\opengit\spark\bin - Copy>spark-submit.cmd --jars just-to-start
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13852
okay, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13852
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
**[Test build #64411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64411/consoleFull)**
for PR 14786 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
I don't think we can do that, because then paths with spaces don't work for
example. don't you just need to escape your argument?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14800
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13852
@maropu we are close to merging PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753. This will eliminate the need for a
per-group (sorted) aggregation approach. On the longer run, it might also
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14800
**[Test build #64412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64412/consoleFull)**
for PR 14800 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user qualiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
Remove double quotes in spark/bin batch files to avoid cutting off
arguments that double quoted as contain special character.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
**[Test build #64415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64415/consoleFull)**
for PR 14806 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573#discussion_r76217738
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* an exception if called
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14804
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64410/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14804
**[Test build #64410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14804 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14806
[SPARK-17061][SPARK-17093][SQL] MapObjects` should make copies of
unsafe-backed data [Backport]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR backports
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64408/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64407/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64407/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
Pardon the dumb question, but your before and after pictures seem like
different graphs. Is that really showing the before and after of one display?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
@srowen please review the latest codes, thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64406/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
**[Test build #64406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64406/consoleFull)**
for PR 14617 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14766
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14805
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14698
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14805
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
301 - 400 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
