Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
**[Test build #64861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64861/consoleFull)**
for PR 14828 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14881#discussion_r77388738
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1308,3 +1315,104 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"ALSModel", path = "character"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64864/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
**[Test build #64864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64864/consoleFull)**
for PR 14939 at commit
Github user robert3005 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573
Agree it would be subsumed and it looks pretty cool. I didn't know you can
make it asynchronous also you want to avoid spinning too many tasks since these
consume resources and block other jobs.
Github user atronchi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10970
How can we workaround this problem when using 1.6.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14718
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14718
I thought you were going to merge it yourself, but since you didn't...
merging to master / 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14718
No luck merging to 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573
Nice change, but I think that at least some of the benefit of this will be
subsumed by #14854, my patch which allows `take()` to cancel the running job as
soon as enough output is produced.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14866
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907#discussion_r77384493
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +163,297 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14881#discussion_r77384344
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1308,3 +1315,104 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"ALSModel", path = "character"),
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907#discussion_r77384218
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -546,33 +281,33 @@ private[jdbc] class JDBCRDD(
Github user zhaoyunjiong commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14887#discussion_r77383971
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
import
Github user srinathshankar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912#discussion_r77383932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,27 @@ class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14866#discussion_r77383666
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ setMethod("join",
signature(x = "SparkDataFrame", y = "SparkDataFrame"),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
**[Test build #64864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64864/consoleFull)**
for PR 14939 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14934
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14939
[SPARK-17376][SPARKR] followup - change since version
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
change since version in doc
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64859/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
**[Test build #64859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64859/consoleFull)**
for PR 14938 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14934
LGTM. Merging into master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14934#discussion_r77381083
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2876,7 +2876,8 @@ setMethod("randn", signature(seed = "numeric"),
#' regexp_extract
#'
-#' Extract
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14934#discussion_r77380815
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2876,7 +2876,8 @@ setMethod("randn", signature(seed = "numeric"),
#' regexp_extract
#'
-#'
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14935
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14935
Merged into master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14866
**[Test build #64863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64863/consoleFull)**
for PR 14866 at commit
Github user srinathshankar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14866#discussion_r77380304
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ setMethod("join",
signature(x = "SparkDataFrame", y = "SparkDataFrame"),
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14857
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14857
Merging into master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14857
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14931
**[Test build #64862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64862/consoleFull)**
for PR 14931 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14931#discussion_r77378981
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -346,15 +346,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14867
cc @srinathshankar
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
Below is a test case for a table with empty column. Could you also add it
here?
```Scala
test("statistics collection of a table with zero column") {
val table_no_cols =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
LGTM except two minor comments about test cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907#discussion_r77377425
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +163,297 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907#discussion_r77377079
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +163,288 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14907#discussion_r77375713
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -546,33 +281,33 @@ private[jdbc] class JDBCRDD(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14927
@davies are we making this assumption anywhere else in our unsafe code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14934#discussion_r77375452
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2876,7 +2876,8 @@ setMethod("randn", signature(seed = "numeric"),
#' regexp_extract
#'
-#' Extract
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
LGTM. Thanks @wangmiao1981 -- I'll keep this open for a bit to see if there
are any more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14935
LGTM. I actually think this might also be useful in 2.0.1 ?
cc @junyangq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r77373066
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -168,6 +170,137 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14924
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14924
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14842#discussion_r77372825
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -333,11 +333,12 @@ public UnsafeSorterIterator
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14924
**[Test build #64856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64856/consoleFull)**
for PR 14924 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64858/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
**[Test build #64858 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64858/consoleFull)**
for PR 14923 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
LGTM again : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14931
Hmm... as far as I understand, `SlaveLost` does not mean "remote machine
has died", it means "remote executor has died", which does not mean that the
shuffle files were lost. Unless you actually try
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
**[Test build #64861 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64861/consoleFull)**
for PR 14828 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
**[Test build #64860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64860/consoleFull)**
for PR 14828 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64860/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14828
**[Test build #64860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64860/consoleFull)**
for PR 14828 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Lgtm. I wonder if it's also useful to set the truncation threshold lower in
test? Though maybe that's a nuisance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14933
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64855/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14933
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14573
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks for working on this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14933
**[Test build #64855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64855/consoleFull)**
for PR 14933 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
**[Test build #64859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64859/consoleFull)**
for PR 14938 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14938
Fix ArrayType and MapType CatalogString.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the `catalogString` for `ArrayType` and `MapType` currently calls the
`simpleString` method on
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77362198
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -405,5 +405,9 @@ private[ml] trait HasAggregationDepth
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64857/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
**[Test build #64857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64857/consoleFull)**
for PR 14923 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
**[Test build #64858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64858/consoleFull)**
for PR 14923 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923#discussion_r77361651
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
---
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ class
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77358835
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923#discussion_r77357355
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
---
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ class MultivariateOnlineSummarizer
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77357216
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -405,5 +405,9 @@ private[ml] trait HasAggregationDepth extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77357109
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77356253
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923#discussion_r77355534
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
---
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ class
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77354917
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -405,5 +405,9 @@ private[ml] trait HasAggregationDepth
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14827
OK that makes sense as a reason to have 2.7 vs <2.6. We already have a
profile for 2.7 anyway. I don't know if it will help to make it active by
default here given how profile activation works.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14913
instead of implementing `equals` and `hashCode`, can we just make
`sparkSession` a curry parameter? e.g. `case class HadoopFsRelation(location:
FileCatalog, ...)(sparkSession: SparkSession)`. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
LGTM, @hvanhovell can you take another look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77352750
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77352634
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14922#discussion_r77352565
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923#discussion_r77352543
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
---
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ class MultivariateOnlineSummarizer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
**[Test build #64857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64857/consoleFull)**
for PR 14923 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923#discussion_r77352136
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/MultivariateOnlineSummarizer.scala
---
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14924
**[Test build #64856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64856/consoleFull)**
for PR 14924 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64853/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14867
**[Test build #64853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64853/consoleFull)**
for PR 14867 at commit
201 - 300 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
