Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64896/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
**[Test build #64896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64896/consoleFull)**
for PR 14948 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64895/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64895/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13767
**[Test build #64897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64897/consoleFull)**
for PR 13767 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13767
@srowen yes, the issue is still there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user techaddict reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13767
[MINOR][SQL] Not dropping all necessary tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
was not dropping table `parquet_t3`
## How was this patch tested?
tested
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948#discussion_r77435330
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ class KMeansSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
**[Test build #64896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64896/consoleFull)**
for PR 14948 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13767
@techaddict I missed this, is it still relevant?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user techaddict closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13767
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64895/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14901
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14901
merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
Assuming my interpretation of the last comment was right, I think this is
good to go. Even if somehow it 'worked' before this is a cleaner implementation
of the same behavior in that case.
---
If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r77433980
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -276,24 +276,64 @@ class ChiSqSelector(object):
"""
Creates a ChiSquared feature selector.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14924
LGTM. Seems like this should go into 2.0.x as well since it's really a bug
fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64894/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
**[Test build #64894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64894/consoleFull)**
for PR 14948 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
Merged to master too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14923
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433#discussion_r77433830
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/Logging.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ private[spark] trait Logging {
val replLevel =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
**[Test build #64894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64894/consoleFull)**
for PR 14948 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
[SPARK-17389] [MLLIB] Significant KMeans speedup with better choice of init
steps, optimizing to remove 'runs'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Deprecate KMeans 'runs'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64893/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
**[Test build #64893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64893/consoleFull)**
for PR 14947 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64891/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919
**[Test build #64891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64891/consoleFull)**
for PR 14919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64892/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
**[Test build #64892 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64892/consoleFull)**
for PR 14946 at commit
Github user rustagi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11205
I am seeing this issue quite frequently. Not sure what is causing it but
frequently we will get a onTaskEnd event after a stage has ended. This will
cause the numRunningTasks to become negative. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
**[Test build #64893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64893/consoleFull)**
for PR 14947 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Some tests might be failed due to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
[SPARK-17388][SQL] Support for inferring type date/timestamp/decimal for
partition column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Spark only supports to infer
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14888#discussion_r77432512
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -613,21 +613,22 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
**[Test build #64892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64892/consoleFull)**
for PR 14946 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
[SPARK-17353] [SPARK-16943] [SPARK-16942] [SPARK-16959] [BACKPORT-2.0]
[SQL] Fix multiple bugs in CREATE TABLE LIKE command
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
**[Test build #64890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64890/consoleFull)**
for PR 14937 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14937
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64890/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64889/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919
**[Test build #64891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64891/consoleFull)**
for PR 14919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14850
**[Test build #64889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64889/consoleFull)**
for PR 14850 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14919
@sameeragarwal Could you take another look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
