Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
**[Test build #64971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64971/consoleFull)**
for PR 14915 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
**[Test build #64960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64960/consoleFull)**
for PR 14966 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64970/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
**[Test build #64970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64970/consoleFull)**
for PR 14969 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64967/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
**[Test build #64967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64967/consoleFull)**
for PR 14915 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
**[Test build #64961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64961/consoleFull)**
for PR 14921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64962/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64963/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #64963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64963/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
**[Test build #64962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64962/consoleFull)**
for PR 14921 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77575448
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14968
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14967
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64968/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14967
**[Test build #64968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64968/consoleFull)**
for PR 14967 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64964/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #64964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64964/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64965/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
**[Test build #64970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64970/consoleFull)**
for PR 14969 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #64965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64965/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64966/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #64966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64966/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
GitHub user cenyuhai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
[SPARK-17406][WEB-UI] limit timeline executor events
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The job page will be too slow to open when there are thousands of executor
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77574745
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915#discussion_r77574630
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -617,7 +617,9 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77574419
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64959/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
**[Test build #64959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64959/consoleFull)**
for PR 14966 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14968
**[Test build #64969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64969/consoleFull)**
for PR 14968 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14968
Target 2.0 branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14968
[SPARK-17369][SQL][2.0] MetastoreRelation toJSON throws AssertException due
to missing otherCopyArgs
backport https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14928 to 2.0
## What changes were
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14797
Just created a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17409
FYI, Spark 2.0.1 has been fixed by this PR, but Spark 2.1.0 has the issue
due to the related codes have been
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77573054
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915#discussion_r77573016
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -617,7 +617,9 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77573002
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r77572880
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -168,6 +171,154 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14797
Thanks! Is there a jira?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14797
The test failure in Spark 2.0 has been fixed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14951. However, after this fix, we still
optimize the query in CTAS twice, as reported in this PR. Thus, I
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77572574
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14797
@gatorsmile want to put the regression tests at here? Or, you have already
have a pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14967
**[Test build #64968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64968/consoleFull)**
for PR 14967 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14967
[Minor] [ML] Correct weights doc of MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```weights``` of
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
LGTM. Pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17408. @wzhfy
Can you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
**[Test build #64967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64967/consoleFull)**
for PR 14915 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
Can you take a look at the test at
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14915
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14928
I will revert it from branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14928
Seems this breaks 2.0 build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #64965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64965/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #64963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64963/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #64966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64966/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #64964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64964/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
Github user cenyuhai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64958/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
**[Test build #64958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64958/consoleFull)**
for PR 14964 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14913
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14913
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
Also many other downstream and upstream applications may also use different
version of Netty jar, it would be better to keep stable for these fundamental
dependences.
---
If your project is set
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77568884
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
**[Test build #64962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64962/consoleFull)**
for PR 14921 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
Upgrading Netty version to branch 1.6 may cause API version incompatible
issue for yarn shuffle service, please see
[SPARK-16018](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16018) and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14921
**[Test build #64961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64961/consoleFull)**
for PR 14921 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14960#discussion_r77568657
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1900,7 +1900,20 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
**[Test build #64960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64960/consoleFull)**
for PR 14966 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Please close it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
**[Test build #64959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64959/consoleFull)**
for PR 14966 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Sorry, I make a mistake... I want to merge pull request to my fork.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user cenyuhai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14966
Merge pull request #8 from apache/master
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14928
LGTM, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14928
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wilson-lauw commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14219
Closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user wilson-lauw closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14219
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14946
LGTM, merging to 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14850
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yiwenzhang92 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14965
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user yiwenzhang92 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14965
minor change to regex pattern
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
**[Test build #64958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64958/consoleFull)**
for PR 14964 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user yhuai reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
[DO NOT MERGE] Test DefinedByConstructorParams
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I am testing DefinedByConstructorParams with branch 1.6. Do not merge it.
You can merge this
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14964
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
