Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14830
Could you maybe give this a clearer PR title as well? Right now it seems to
imply the current examples aren't passing the pep8 tool but they currently are.
Maybe something like "import sort and auto
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912
@gatorsmile I've described it in the pr description.
Simply said, now a Filter will be stopped to pushdown once it encounters
another Filter. `BooleanSimplification` rule will simplify the pr
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78136301
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -26,30 +67,26 @@
PYLINT_REPORT_PATH="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/pylint-report.txt"
PYLINT_INSTALL_INFO="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/p
Github user Stibbons commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
Hum I don't see how it was reenabled... Where is it called? And I had many
errors to ignore once I have reenabled it on the execution of lint-python.
I'll update the title. At least, being
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78135944
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -26,30 +67,26 @@
PYLINT_REPORT_PATH="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/pylint-report.txt"
PYLINT_INSTALL_INFO="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/py
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #65143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65143/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
[`23e2dc8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78135769
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -17,6 +17,47 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
+VIRTUAL_ENV_DIR="build/venv"
+if [[ ! -z $VIRTUA
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
Oh wait I've been a little confused by the PR title - pylint is already
reenabled and was only temporary disabled awhile back - maybe less important
but would make sense in the context of the other
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78135582
--- Diff: dev/requirements.txt ---
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
jira==1.0.3
PyGithub==1.26.0
Unidecode==0.04.19
+pep8==1.7.0
--- End diff --
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78135524
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -26,30 +67,26 @@
PYLINT_REPORT_PATH="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/pylint-report.txt"
PYLINT_INSTALL_INFO="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/p
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15004#discussion_r78135593
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -383,7 +385,14 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #65142 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65142/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
[`01105f5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #65139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65139/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
[`679efb2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #65140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65140/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
[`c18781e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #65141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65141/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`a8c30c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #65138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65138/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
[`63bcc08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15014
The only one error looks just about the changed behavior in
`StringFunctionsSuite`. Could you fix that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15004
**[Test build #65137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65137/consoleFull)**
for PR 15004 at commit
[`5d0cffe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
Thanks for working to reenable pylint (super important IMHO). Perhaps
@davies could take a look at this approach?
I like the building up of venv seems to help set up for your other work
improvin
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78133178
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -17,6 +17,47 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
+VIRTUAL_ENV_DIR="build/venv"
+if [[ ! -z $VIRTUAL
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963#discussion_r78133102
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -26,30 +67,26 @@
PYLINT_REPORT_PATH="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/pylint-report.txt"
PYLINT_INSTALL_INFO="$SPARK_ROOT_DIR/dev/py
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15004
Accepted all the comments. Will address comments now. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
**[Test build #65135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65135/consoleFull)**
for PR 15015 at commit
[`91ae8d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65135/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912
Could you define the conditions in which the predicates are unable to be
pushed down? Then, we can easily justify the significance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14864
**[Test build #65136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65136/consoleFull)**
for PR 14864 at commit
[`445549b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
**[Test build #65135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65135/consoleFull)**
for PR 15015 at commit
[`91ae8d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65134/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`7b55255`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65134/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yintengfei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15020
You can find : File -> Project Structure -> Modules -> Dependcies , change
the provided to compile.
As HyukjinKwon say , you'd better ask this to user-mailing list .
---
If your projec
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14864#discussion_r78129784
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -156,24 +155,57 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r78129508
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65131/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #65131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65131/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
[`bc70354`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65133/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65133/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`1142fac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78128581
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -460,33 +564,74 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65134/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`7b55255`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78128374
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -460,33 +564,74 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65132/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
**[Test build #65132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65132/consoleFull)**
for PR 15021 at commit
[`275fd85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78128102
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -452,6 +555,7 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0") (
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78127943
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -370,49 +420,102 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65133/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`1142fac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
Up to my knowledge, INFRA ticket made by @shivaram is enough for now. For
Apache REEF, we filed the following INFRA issue like that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11411
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78127321
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -370,49 +420,102 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0"
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Hmm the Jenkins error was
```
find: cannot delete `pkg/vignettes': Directory not empty
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78126776
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -370,49 +420,102 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0"
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14719#discussion_r78126865
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -683,8 +710,14 @@ class Analyzer(
try {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15020
Maybe you'd better close this PR and ask this to user-mailing list. I think
we can have a better answer. Please refer
http://spark.apache.org/community.html to subscribe.
---
If your project i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
**[Test build #65132 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65132/consoleFull)**
for PR 15021 at commit
[`275fd85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15021
[SPARK-17464][SparkR][ML] SparkR spark.als arguments reg should be 0.1 by
default.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkR ```spark.als``` arguments ```reg``` should be 0.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65130/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`adabb2d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65130/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
@dongjoon-hyun Meanwhile, do you mind if I ask whether you have any idea on
this maybe?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user spark-test-client commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
@dongjoon-hyun Meanwhile, do you mind if I ask whether you have any idea on
this maybe?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
@srowen If it is okï¼can you merge this pr to masterï¼thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14912
@srinathshankar @gatorsmile I think CNF is another issue other then the
issue this PR was proposed to solve at the first. I would like to solve the
original adjoining Filter pushdown problem here. An
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
@felixcheung we still need to deal with the leftover files in that case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #65131 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65131/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
[`bc70354`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
I will check this out as far as I can and be back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
**[Test build #65130 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65130/consoleFull)**
for PR 14980 at commit
[`adabb2d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12590
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r78124662
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
I think we need to file an INFRA ticket like
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11294 -- I'll file one now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
@HyukjinKwon I thought it should have run the tests ? Any ideas why its not
getting picked up ? Is there some other set of steps that we need to do ? (I'm
now investigating how it works for Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65129/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #65129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65129/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`2a8d2b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65128/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #65128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65128/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`fbe4549`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15015
@keypointt let's have a check for the first few values perhaps?
@HyukjinKwon It seems it would be good to start running R tests though I'm
not sure actually - I'd defer to @shivaram
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65126/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #65126 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65126/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
[`a8f89d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15020
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user bigdatatraining opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15020
Spark 2.0 error in Intellij
If i run twitter code in Console it's working fine, but if i run same
command in Spark 2.0 in Intellij I got this error
Exception in thread "main"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65127/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #65127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65127/consoleFull)**
for PR 14702 at commit
[`f5256dd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user JustinPihony commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601
Can this be merged now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14969
@srowen I remove parallel maps, please review the latest codes.Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15013
Done with all change. Ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65124/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15013
**[Test build #65124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65124/consoleFull)**
for PR 15013 at commit
[`71fa2e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750#discussion_r78120149
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
@cloud-fan Do you mind if I ask to take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
Gentle ping @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14399
Gentle ping @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14172
Could you take a look please @yhuai and @liancheng ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
