[GitHub] spark issue #15423: [SPARK-17860][SQL] SHOW COLUMN's database conflict check...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423 **[Test build #67060 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67060/consoleFull)** for PR 15423 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15481: [SPARK-17929] [CORE] Fix deadlock when CoarseGrainedSche...

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67054/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15481: [SPARK-17929] [CORE] Fix deadlock when CoarseGrainedSche...

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15481: [SPARK-17929] [CORE] Fix deadlock when CoarseGrainedSche...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481 **[Test build #67054 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67054/consoleFull)** for PR 15481 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request #15509: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

Github user someorz closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15509 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] spark issue #15509: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15509 Could you please close this? It seems mistakenly opened. @someorz --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark issue #11119: [SPARK-10780][ML] Add an initial model to kmeans

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67051/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #11119: [SPARK-10780][ML] Add an initial model to kmeans

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark pull request #15510: new

Github user codlife closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15510 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] spark issue #11119: [SPARK-10780][ML] Add an initial model to kmeans

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9 **[Test build #67051 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67051/consoleFull)** for PR 9 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request #15510: new

GitHub user codlife opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15510 new ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? (Please fill in changes proposed in this fix) ## How was this patch tested? (Please explain how this patch was

[GitHub] spark issue #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 **[Test build #67059 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67059/consoleFull)** for PR 15508 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67059/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15509: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15509 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark pull request #15509: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

GitHub user someorz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15509 Merge pull request #1 from apache/master ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? (Please fill in changes proposed in this fix) ## How was this patch tested?

[GitHub] spark issue #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 **[Test build #67059 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67059/consoleFull)** for PR 15508 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 cc @rxin --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] spark pull request #15508: [DO-NOT-MERGE]

GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508 [DO-NOT-MERGE] You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark api-backport Alternatively you can review and apply these

[GitHub] spark issue #13780: [SPARK-16063][SQL] Add storageLevel to Dataset

Github user MLnick commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13780 @marmbrus thanks for merging this. For me there is still an open question around handling of deser storage levels on the PySpark side (see my comments

[GitHub] spark issue #15316: [SPARK-17751] [SQL] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and O...

Github user rxin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] spark pull request #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query i...

Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query in CTAS ...

Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502 Thanks! Close it now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query in CTAS ...

Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502 LGTM, merging to 2.0! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #15316: [SPARK-17751] [SQL] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and O...

Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316 LGTM, cc @hvanhovell @rxin for final sign-off --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark issue #15148: [SPARK-5992][ML] Locality Sensitive Hashing

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67055/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15148: [SPARK-5992][ML] Locality Sensitive Hashing

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15148: [SPARK-5992][ML] Locality Sensitive Hashing

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148 **[Test build #67055 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67055/consoleFull)** for PR 15148 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15316: [SPARK-17751] [SQL] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and O...

Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316 cc @hvanhovell @rxin Any more comment about this PR? I assume Spark 2.0.2 needs it. Recently, when we analyzing the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17709, we are

[GitHub] spark issue #15316: [SPARK-17751] [SQL] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and O...

Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316 Also cc @cloud-fan and @liancheng --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark pull request #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query i...

Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502#discussion_r83587470 --- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala --- @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ private[hive] case class

[GitHub] spark pull request #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query i...

Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502#discussion_r83586555 --- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala --- @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ private[hive] case class

[GitHub] spark issue #15481: [SPARK-17929] [CORE] Fix deadlock when CoarseGrainedSche...

Github user jerryshao commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481 LGTM, sorry to bring in deadlock issue. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15316: [SPARK-17751] [SQL] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and O...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316 **[Test build #67058 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67058/consoleFull)** for PR 15316 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15467: [SPARK-17912][SQL] Refactor code generation to get data ...

Github user ericl commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467 Will do On Sun, Oct 16, 2016, 11:35 PM Kazuaki Ishizaki wrote: > @ericl , could you please review this? cc > @davies

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #67057 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67057/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15502: [SPARK-17892] [SQL] [2.0] Do Not Optimize Query in CTAS ...

Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15502 cc @yhuai @hvanhovell @cloud-fan I guess this needs to be merged to 2.0.2 ASAP? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83585137 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ManualClock.scala --- @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.util private[spark] class

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3354 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3354/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15468: [SPARK-17915][SQL] Prepare a new ColumnVector implementa...

Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468 @davies, could you please review this at first if #15219 is too big? cc @tedyu, @sameeragarwal --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3353 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3353/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3352 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3352/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67053/ Test FAILed. ---

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83584538 --- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala --- @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83584423 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ManualClock.scala --- @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.util private[spark] class

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83584420 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ManualClock.scala --- @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.util private[spark] class

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83584305 --- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala --- @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite

[GitHub] spark issue #15219: [SPARK-14098][SQL] Generate Java code to build CachedCol...

Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219 @davies, could you please review this if this size is fine with you? If it is too big, could you please review #15462, #15467, #15468 at first? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3351 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3351/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15467: [SPARK-17912][SQL] Refactor code generation to get data ...

Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467 @ericl, could you please review this? cc @davies --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark issue #15505: [WIP][SPARK-17931]taskScheduler has some unneeded serial...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505 **[Test build #67056 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67056/consoleFull)** for PR 15505 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15462: [SPARK-17680] [SQL] [TEST] Added test cases for InMemory...

Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15462 @davies, could you please review this at first if #15219 is too big? @vanzin --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] spark pull request #15497: [Test][SPARK-16002][Follow-up] Fix flaky test in ...

Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15497#discussion_r83583177 --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ManualClock.scala --- @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.util private[spark] class

[GitHub] spark issue #15506: [MINOR][SQL] Add prettyName for current_database functio...

Github user weiqingy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15506 @rxin Thanks for reviewing this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] spark issue #15148: [SPARK-5992][ML] Locality Sensitive Hashing

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148 **[Test build #67055 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67055/consoleFull)** for PR 15148 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request #15500: [SPARK-17956][SQL] Fix projection output ordering

Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500#discussion_r83582706 --- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala --- @@ -77,9 +77,40 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:

[GitHub] spark pull request #15376: [SPARK-17796][SQL] Support wildcard character in ...

Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15376#discussion_r83582717 --- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala --- @@ -246,7 +247,27 @@ case class LoadDataCommand(

[GitHub] spark pull request #15480: [SPARK-16845][SQL] `GeneratedClass$SpecificOrderi...

Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r83582242 --- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala --- @@ -118,7 +118,45 @@ object

[GitHub] spark issue #15481: [SPARK-17929] [CORE] Fix deadlock when CoarseGrainedSche...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481 **[Test build #67054 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67054/consoleFull)** for PR 15481 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #67053 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67053/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3351 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3351/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15492: [DO NOT MERGE][TEST] Testing flakiness of StreamingQuery...

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15492 **[Test build #3350 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3350/consoleFull)** for PR 15492 at commit

<    1   2   3   4   5   6