Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15027
**[Test build #67931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67931/consoleFull)**
for PR 15027 at commit
[`9ff89c0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15027
It turns out there is a bug in Hadoop's FileContext that doesn't rename the
checksum file.
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67921/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #67921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67921/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
[`72084a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user jiexiong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
[SPARK-18208] [Shuffle] Executor OOM due to a memory leak in BytesToBytesMap
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed the OOM problem in BytesToBytesMap.
## How w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
**[Test build #67930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67930/consoleFull)**
for PR 15703 at commit
[`6f28688`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15718
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15718
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67918/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67929/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
**[Test build #67929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67929/consoleFull)**
for PR 13617 at commit
[`a5d9972`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15718
**[Test build #67918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67918/consoleFull)**
for PR 15718 at commit
[`29ccf4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #67919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67919/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
[`05c83fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Ah, yes actually that's a problem now unfortunately. It seems even
comitters can't retrigger. Actually, that's why I ran this via another account
and left the comment above. I am trying to find
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
No, I just launched Jenkins test. I don't know how to manually trigger the
AppVeyor test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
@ericl I can do that, yes. I'm current tied down. I will push a new commit
later today or tonight.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
**[Test build #67927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67927/consoleFull)**
for PR 15703 at commit
[`3af4f21`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
**[Test build #67928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67928/consoleFull)**
for PR 15618 at commit
[`1521572`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
Oh wait, it seems the failed test is related. Will take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
It turned out that I didn't initialize Hive UDAF evaluators properly.
Quoted from commit message of my previous commit:
> Hive UDAFs are sensitive to aggregation mode, and must be
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
GitHub user HyukjinKwon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
[SPARK-14914][CORE] Fix Resource not closed after using, mostly for unit
tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Close `FileStreams`, `ZipFiles` etc to release the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
Ll
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15618
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Oh, AppVeyor test is not triggered again with the Jebkins one.
Or, do you mean you launched another build via another account and manually
tested it?
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Closing PR given pushback to commit'ing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mridulm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15698
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67917/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15698
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
I think we should try and get so that it can be a part of the 2.1 release
so we can have publishing to PyPI added in 2.1.1 or 2.2. We've been looking at
making PySpark installable with pip since Apr
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Thank you for merging this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #67926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67926/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
[`1cdcf61`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67923/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67923/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`7d3c74c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15718
**[Test build #67925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67925/consoleFull)**
for PR 15718 at commit
[`c0263d7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #67922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67922/consoleFull)**
for PR 15721 at commit
[`e10be45`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15719
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67914/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15719
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15719
**[Test build #67914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67914/consoleFull)**
for PR 15719 at commit
[`c56011e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
I close this PR since the issue is closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14435
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637
BTW, please follow the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/issues/15677 to
rewrite your function description. Add an example for the new function if
possible.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86031611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675#discussion_r86030559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -290,7 +290,10 @@ class StreamingQuerySuite extends Stream
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675#discussion_r86030545
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerBus.scala
---
@@ -50,7 +52,14 @@ class StreamingQueryListen
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
So, if we consistently use `instr.logParams(params: _*)` (even in cases
where it's acceptable) then we run the risk of adding some param in the future
that could "overload" the logs (like initialMode
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15637#discussion_r86030388
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/MapAggregate.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licens
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700
@srowen LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user rdblue closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13880
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14906
**[Test build #3390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3390/consoleFull)**
for PR 14906 at commit
[`aa18bb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15088
@srowen, if you have a chance, could you look at this again? I think it
will be helpful for tracking down live-lock issues. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700#discussion_r86029381
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RUtils.scala ---
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ private[spark] object RUtils {
}
} else {
Github user vlad17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
@jkbradley There seems to be more issues with deprecating impurity:
[error] [warn]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15720
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15720
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67916/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15720
**[Test build #67916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67916/consoleFull)**
for PR 15720 at commit
[`c1469b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
@HyukjinKwon It seems that windows test still fails with the same error
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67924/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
[`b06de5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67912/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67912/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
[`0742318`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67913/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
[`a2ea180`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
@mallman shall we go ahead and revert that in this PR? It didn't help with
debugging the flaky test much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
**[Test build #67923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67923/consoleFull)**
for PR 15647 at commit
[`7d3c74c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Ah, I see. It's feature freeze. Thank you for informing me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Not rc, but the branch cut.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67920/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
Any more comments, or shall I merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15647
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
**[Test build #67920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67920/consoleFull)**
for PR 15697 at commit
[`a292ae8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67907/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
[`9dcb249`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
**[Test build #67911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67911/consoleFull)**
for PR 15705 at commit
[`ca31f35`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Oh, 2.1-rc1 today? I see.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
Could we add all the positive and negative cases in `ExternalCatalogSuite`,
like the other APIs. Then, we can easily know whether the behaviors of
`InMemoryCatalog` and `HiveExternalCatalog` are
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
@dongjoon-hyun we are going to cut the release branch today (or tomorrow)
so it would be good to get this in asap.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688#discussion_r86023753
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -471,11 +471,30 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
This issue also brings up a more general point of how sample weights should
be tested. It seems there are some common rules that all algorithms that
incorporate sample weights are thought to follow (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #67922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67922/consoleFull)**
for PR 15721 at commit
[`e10be45`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Sorry for delay, @rxin . I'm still working on, and will update in a few
days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
[SPARK-17772][ML][TEST] Add test functions for ML sample weights
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
More and more ML algos are accepting sample weights, and they have been
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14906
**[Test build #3390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3390/consoleFull)**
for PR 14906 at commit
[`aa18bb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14906
LGTM if tests pass again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
@dongjoon-hyun any update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567#discussion_r86019635
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -264,23 +264,43 @@ trait NonSQLExpression extends Exp
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567#discussion_r86018687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -264,23 +264,43 @@ trait NonSQLExpression extends Expre
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #67921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67921/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
[`72084a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
301 - 400 of 763 matches
Mail list logo
