Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
What is the behavior of DESC COLUMN for the complex/nested type (map,
struct, array)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94208490
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94208116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94207926
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -108,14 +108,32 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94207873
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
---
@@ -57,26 +57,28 @@ class
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16423
hi @yhuai, could you also:
add:
```
lw-lin - Liwei Lin
```
update:
```
sharkdtu - Xiaogang Tu
cenyuhai - Yuhai Ceng
```
---
If your project is set up
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
yes, let me backport the test cases for checking the staging file.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Xiao Li wrote:
> Is that possible to backport the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70737/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
retest yhis please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077#discussion_r94205390
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -559,15 +560,29 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70735/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
**[Test build #70735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70735/testReport)**
for PR 16433 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Is that possible to backport the test cases in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16399?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70734/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70734 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70734/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94204568
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70736/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70736 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70736/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
Generally, the solution also looks ok to me. I think the test case coverage
needs to be improved.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
Could you also add a test case for verifying the error behaviors?
For example, in the definition of a nested view, how Analyzer behaves when
the dependent databases, views, or views are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70733/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70733 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70733/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202865
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -465,6 +465,35 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202897
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -465,6 +465,35 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202769
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -658,6 +719,21 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202754
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2224,6 +2316,16 @@ object EliminateSubqueryAliases
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94202748
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -586,6 +587,100 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(
}
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94202675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202502
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -658,6 +719,21 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202491
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2224,6 +2316,16 @@ object EliminateSubqueryAliases
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202380
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -377,6 +378,39 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r94202164
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -845,6 +846,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70736/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429#discussion_r94201674
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -382,18 +382,30 @@ def _hijack_namedtuple():
return
global _old_namedtuple #
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
**[Test build #70735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70735/testReport)**
for PR 16433 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Build started: [TESTS]
`org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70734/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
I just manually ran `./dev/create-release/translate-contributors.py` which
had a conflict for sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435#discussion_r94201244
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -154,21 +200,19 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
@srowen, thank you Sean. I think it is okay for now. To be honest, I found
some more same instances but I haven't fixed, tested and verified them yet.
Maybe, I need one more go to deal with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
In most cases, it seems they explicitly write `\n` (e.g. writing CSV and
JSON). _Apparently_, these seem only tests being failed due to this problem
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433#discussion_r94200602
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +30,16 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16439
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zuotingbing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16439
[SPARK-19026]SPARK_LOCAL_DIRS(multiple directories on different disks)
cannot be deleted
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19026
SPARK_LOCAL_DIRS (Standalone)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70733 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70733/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94199600
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -586,6 +587,100 @@ case class DescribeTableCommand(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422#discussion_r94199552
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -300,10 +300,21 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user zdh2292390 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16415
@jkbradley Yes,changing the storageLevel in predErrorCheckpointer can fix
the problem.
Can you please merge my latest commit which just changed the storageLevel
in
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16414
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70731/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70731 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70731/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70730/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #70730 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70730/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70727/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
**[Test build #70727 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70727/testReport)**
for PR 16438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70732/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70732/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
@HyukjinKwon I just pushed a change that makes the corrupt record handling
consistent: if a corrupt record column is defined it will always get the json
text for failed records. If `wholeFile`
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397#discussion_r94190092
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalogBackwardCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -185,8 +191,8 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70732/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
the only problem I see is that with this code we generate k-1 clusters
instead of k, but it states in the algorithm documentation that it is not
guaranteed to generate k clusters, it could be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70731 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70731/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
The only failure is irrelevant to this PR.
```
[info] StreamSuite:
[info] - fatal errors from a source should be sent to the user *** FAILED
*** (101 milliseconds)
[info]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70726/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70726/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94187848
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
LGTM, just one comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16426
It looks OK to me. Do you have a moment to grep for other instances in the
tests (at least Java ones) where a new SparkContext is created in the test, to
see if any other contexts need to be
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Maybe a dumb question but why is this only a problem in this test and not
for many other test suites? i'd sort of imagine the newline difference affects
a lot of comparisons.
---
If your project
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417#discussion_r94187427
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -310,6 +310,31 @@ class
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
@yu-iskw Pinging on this since you wrote bisecting k-means originally. Do
you have time to take a look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16415
Thanks for checking!
Does changing the storageLevel in predErrorCheckpointer fix the problem?
"other use cases": Well, I remember thinking about this a lot when adding
the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #70730 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70730/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16423
Thanks. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077#discussion_r94185533
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -559,15 +560,29 @@
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16408
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16408
Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70729/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70729 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70729/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70728/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70728/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70729 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70729/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks @imatiach-msft !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
**[Test build #70728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70728/testReport)**
for PR 16424 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424
@ericl @CodingCat Thanks for the review! Fixed per your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94181109
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo