Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70725/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70725/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
[`9693ef1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
**[Test build #70727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70727/testReport)**
for PR 16438 at commit
[`b38c53c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70724/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
**[Test build #70724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70724/testReport)**
for PR 16437 at commit
[`722a0e2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16438
[SPARK-19029] [SQL] Remove databaseName from SimpleCatalogRelation
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove useless `databaseName ` from `SimpleCatalogRelation`.
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Hi, @gatorsmile .
I have no objections on your patch! So, I merged that into this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
**[Test build #70726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70726/testReport)**
for PR 15664 at commit
[`2cc738a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2c
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94177466
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -211,6 +211,55 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Lo
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94177293
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -211,6 +211,55 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Lo
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
Thank you always, @hvanhovel !
Happy new year! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user merlintang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Thanks, Wenchen, I have backport the code of #16339 to here, I have tested
it locally. Can you review and verify?
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Wenchen Fan
wrote:
> #
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
Also, could you please change the PR description to be self-contained
(rather than just referencing another PR)? The description becomes the commit
message.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70725/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
[`9693ef1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/96
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94175664
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -568,10 +617,9 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Lo
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94175562
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
testDefa
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94175568
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
testDefa
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94175547
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
testDefa
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Thank you for deep review again, @viirya and @gatorsmile .
I'll update the PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this `CREATE TABLE ... LOCATION` document issue when you
have sometime?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this `createTempViewCommand` PR again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Could you review this `CSVInferSchema` issue again, @gatorsmile ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94174966
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
testDefa
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
done!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433#discussion_r94174880
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +30,16 @@ import
org.apache.spark
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94174586
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
testDefaultR
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16374
Some operators (e.g., window) may still need to use these RDD, dropping
them will slow your application. That's why `DStream` uses `rememberDuration`
to filter RDDs.
You can [tune the memor
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170967
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be cont
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170820
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be cont
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170722
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ new data.
### Saving to Persistent Tables
`DataFrames` can also be saved as pers
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16389
Can we just not reset `numRunningTasks` to 0? I think it should include
speculative tasks and we can add a comment about it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
@mengxr @jkbradley @MLnick @HyukjinKwon @holdenk would you be able to take
a look at the changes - it looks like you have previously modified
StringIndexer.scala file.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
**[Test build #70724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70724/testReport)**
for PR 16437 at commit
[`722a0e2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/72
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434#discussion_r94165525
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2629,6 +2629,8 @@ class ChiSqSelector(JavaEstimator, HasFeaturesCol,
HasOutputCol, HasLabelCol, Ja
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
A related PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12915
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
cc @zsxwing @cloud-fan @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
[SPARK-19028] [SQL] Fixed non-thread-safe functions used in SessionCatalog
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed non-thread-safe functions used in SessionCatalog:
- r
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Will do!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
> Note this is compatible with the views defined by older versions of
Spark(before 2.2), which have empty defaultDatabase and all the relations in
viewText have database part defined.
We
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
> 4. Add `AnalysisContext` to enable us to still support a view created
with CTE/Windows query.
What is the `AnalysisContext `?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
[`fb9acb2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
@mpjlu Thanks for the follow-up PR. @jkbradley Please feel free to shepherd
that PR, since I'm on travel these days. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
**[Test build #70721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/testReport)**
for PR 16434 at commit
[`17a7288`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
[`fb9acb2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fb
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
GitHub user imatiach-msft opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
[SPARK-18698][ML][MLLIB] Adding public constructor that takes uid for
IndexToString
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on SPARK-18698, this adds a public const
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
**[Test build #70722 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/testReport)**
for PR 16435 at commit
[`bd6a6d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
**[Test build #70722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/testReport)**
for PR 16435 at commit
[`bd6a6d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
[SPARK-19027][SQL] estimate size of object buffer for object hash aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In object hash aggregate, we fall back to sort based aggreg
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
cc @yhuai @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
hi @jkbradley @yanboliang , I have created a follow up PR for this PR.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
I have not added FDR test in ML Suite. The main reason is the current data
set is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
**[Test build #70721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/testReport)**
for PR 16434 at commit
[`17a7288`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/17
GitHub user mpjlu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
[SPARK-17645][MLLIB][ML][FOLLOW-UP] document minor change
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr for #15212 to address @jkbradley comments on
Document change.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94141624
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect extend
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16377
ping @sethah
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
@jkbradley @srowen any comments on the changes? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
[`d222020`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94139716
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect extend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #70719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
[`30cb1ae`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16428
Do you mind if I ask wheather it writes the line separstor correctly as the
encoding specified in the option?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16425
Yeah it contains the 'originals' of some graphics IIRC so we can leave it
for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Thanks @jkbradley , I will send a follow-up PR for your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
[`d222020`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d2
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #70719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
[`30cb1ae`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/30
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70718/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
**[Test build #70718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70718/testReport)**
for PR 16433 at commit
[`15f821c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70717/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #70717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70717/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
[`df839f8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70714/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
**[Test build #70714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70714/testReport)**
for PR 16431 at commit
[`c064595`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70713/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70713/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
[`965a4a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70716/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70716/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
[`d222020`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Build started: [TESTS]
`org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite`
[**
for PR 16433 at commit
[`15f821c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/15
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
[SPARK-19022][TESTS] Fix tests dependent on OS due to different newline
characters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two tests failing on Windows due to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94114431
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect ext
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70715/
Test PASSed.
---
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
