Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100383151
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -741,14 +741,6 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
kl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72656/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
[`67a4acb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/67
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
@actuaryzhang sorry I'm at Spark Summit East, will take a look soon. For
the feature name or "lazy val featureName: Array[String]", I recall there is a
sparse (eg output by HashingTF) and den
Github user Bcpoole commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864#discussion_r100381372
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/IncompatibleUnionException.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100381544
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
k
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
merged to master, thanks @jsoltren
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde You should be whitelisted now. you may use "retest this please" to
trigger tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864
I meant just union, but createUnion ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Pinging @brkyvz and @srowen once more for a final look and to get Jenkins
to retest the latest update (not sure if this still requires Jenkins admin
rights).
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
@cloud-fan:
> Spark does support mixed-case-schema tables, and it has always been. It's
because we write table schema to metastore case-preserving, via table
properties.
Spark prior
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100378935
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14461
@HyukjinKwon Thanks for reminding. I will have a look asap. Too many things
to recently.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16869
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16869
I had an offline discussion with @rxin about this, and we have decided to
merge this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72655/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
[`1c88474`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1c
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
@bogdanrdc can you create a backport for branch-2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
LGTM - merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72648/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user tribbloid commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785
yeah, just need to rebase on 2.2-SNAPSHOT+
are you going to merge immediately after rebase + syntax validation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72648/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
[`21be4ca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
I'm going to merge this in master. If we find a way to optimize the test we
can do a follow-up pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72649/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user grabblies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7266
When "skip" is chosen as the way to handle Unseen labels, is there a way to
know which rows were skipped?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72649/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
[`2a55c45`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
**[Test build #72647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72647/testReport)**
for PR 16872 at commit
[`bb5a1da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
**[Test build #72654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72654/testReport)**
for PR 16862 at commit
[`bdbe267`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
Kafka test error (hopefully unrelated?). Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692
Either close or make the right fix. As it is, the PR is not doing the right
thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user huaxingao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10262
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16846
@holdenk Sadly this part of the API is not tested directly and we depend on
the indirect coverage. Maybe this is a sign should be tested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r100366614
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +154,12 @@ object Literal {
Literal(Ca
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100366124
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Datase
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
@viirya I believe this PR meshes with the refactoring and application to
pregel GraphX algorithms in #15125. Basically, it moves the periodic
checkpointing code from mllib into core and uses it in G
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r100365381
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -102,6 +102,27 @@ object functions {
Column(literalExpr)
}
Github user wangmiao1981 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user wangmiao1981 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
[SPARK-19456][SparkR]:Add LinearSVC R API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Linear SVM classifier is newly added into ML and python API has been added.
This JIRA i
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
Open to trigger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
close to trigger windows test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16785#discussion_r100364260
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -314,19 +322,29 @@ abstract class UnaryNode exte
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873
**[Test build #72653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72653/testReport)**
for PR 16873 at commit
[`d85aed7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
@GayathriMurali If you are not able to proceed, I can take over. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r100360787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +154,12 @@ object Literal {
Litera
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r100360526
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -102,6 +102,27 @@ object functions {
Column(literalExpr)
}
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578#discussion_r100360523
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/GetStructField2.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610
**[Test build #72652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72652/testReport)**
for PR 16610 at commit
[`ca2e07f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ca
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873#discussion_r100357789
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/grouping_set.sql ---
@@ -13,5 +18,8 @@ SELECT a, b, c, count(d) FROM grouping GROUP BY a, b, c
GRO
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855#discussion_r100356980
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +665,55 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends SparkFun
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #72651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72651/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`b7866de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b7
Github user zommerfelds commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13467
Hi @HyukjinKwon, I never worked on the fix, because I never got
confirmation if this is actually a bug or not. This PR demonstrates the bug I
posted on Jira.
If you want I can try to find ou
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72650/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #72650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72650/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
[`21643b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #72650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72650/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
[`21643b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/21
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872#discussion_r100350259
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameRangeSuite.scala ---
@@ -127,4 +133,28 @@ class DataFrameRangeSuite extends QueryTest wit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873
Thank you for ccing me @hvanhovell ! This PR looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873#discussion_r100348823
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/grouping_set.sql ---
@@ -13,5 +18,8 @@ SELECT a, b, c, count(d) FROM grouping GROUP BY a, b, c
GR
Github user ala commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872#discussion_r100347811
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameRangeSuite.scala ---
@@ -127,4 +133,28 @@ class DataFrameRangeSuite extends QueryTest with
Shar
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100345819
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -845,10 +855,10 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855#discussion_r100346247
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -874,7 +874,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
//
Github user robert3005 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16575
Removed the caching logic. It was there since I wasn't sure how often we
call inputRDDs and how many times the resulting rdd would get created overall
since it's a def now
---
If your project i
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16199
@HyukjinKwon Good idea, I'll take another stab and try to revive the
original pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100344879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -48,69 +47,102 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100344282
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -48,69 +47,102 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72649/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
[`2a55c45`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2a
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100343323
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -845,10 +855,10 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72645/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16873
**[Test build #72645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72645/testReport)**
for PR 16873 at commit
[`b54ef73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72646/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72646/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
[`de28fd4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72643/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
**[Test build #72643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72643/testReport)**
for PR 16872 at commit
[`7d1c014`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100332529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -298,22 +312,22 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72648/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
[`21be4ca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16872
**[Test build #72647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72647/testReport)**
for PR 16872 at commit
[`bb5a1da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bb
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100329892
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -845,10 +855,10 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72642/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72642/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
[`7e52a83`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100320712
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala
---
@@ -1149,13 +1179,23 @@ private object Client extends Loggi
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100313659
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -719,7 +719,20 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
p
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100312242
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100318015
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java ---
@@ -49,6 +49,38 @@
*
*
*
+ * Currently, for curre
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100318779
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java ---
@@ -49,6 +49,38 @@
*
*
*
+ * Currently, for curre
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100312144
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100313512
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -719,7 +719,20 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
p
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100318547
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java ---
@@ -49,6 +49,38 @@
*
*
*
+ * Currently, for curre
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100316402
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -94,6 +103,13 @@
static final Map launcherConfig = new H
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r100316424
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -94,6 +103,13 @@
static final Map launcherConfig = new H
301 - 400 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
