Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985#discussion_r102992758
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73433/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #73433 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73433/testReport)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16923
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16923
Merging to master (2.1 and 2.0 if no conflicts).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17038
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17038
Merging to master (2.1 if no conflicts).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user susanxhuynh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
If we're concerned about the lost reviveOffer() and don't want to handle
that corner case, do we want to document it somewhere for operators? "If jobs
aren't running and you see [...] in the
Github user susanxhuynh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
The suppress / revive logic LGTM. I didn't look that closely at the
refactoring changes. Where are the Mesos/Spark integration tests that you
mentioned? @mgummelt
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17043
**[Test build #73432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73432/testReport)**
for PR 17043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73432/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
I agree, just in case someone does have an isinstance check (or similar) we
should document the change in the release notes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13932
**[Test build #73435 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73435/testReport)**
for PR 13932 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #73434 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73434/testReport)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
Thanks @holdenk. I think it should be mentioned as a change of behavior in
the release notes. We don't change API, and `UserDefinedFunction` is hardly
public (it is not even included in the docs),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #73433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73433/testReport)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r102977480
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
@uncleGen: reviewed this, tweaked the docs slightly but otherwise, there's
nothing left to do that I can see
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
Merged to master, thanks @zero323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17043
**[Test build #73432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73432/testReport)**
for PR 17043 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
Great! Thanks for doing this, will merge to master :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985#discussion_r102974682
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ import
Github user roryodonnell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14807
This causes issues starting Spark using the SparkLauncher under Windows,
only when one sets an additional config parameter using the
SparkLauncher.setConf method
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14412
**[Test build #73431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73431/testReport)**
for PR 14412 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16534
Don't worry, I get it :) The point is to make user experience better not
worse, right? In practice:
- These changes are pretty far from data, so overall impact is negligible
and constant.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73429/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73429/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16927
I could add the 2.6.5 binaries if you want, though the 2.6.4 ones should be
compatible.
I think I just lifted the 2.6.x artifacts out of an HDP build; its only the
2.7.x ones where I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73430/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #73430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73430/testReport)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #73430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73430/testReport)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17054
This is on purpose to show the speed effect of caching. Please close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
(apologies for not replying; rebuilding a deceased laptop)
My main concern is to have the ability to make spark releases which include
the object store client libraries and a set of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73427/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #73427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73427/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73429/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan could you help to review this pr? thanks :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73428/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73428/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17027
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73425/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17027
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17027
**[Test build #73425 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73425/testReport)**
for PR 17027 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73426/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73426 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73426/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user dsimmie commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
Is there any plan to apply this fix to 1.6? (am using the Cloudera version
`spark-1.6.0-cdh5.9.0`) and am seeing this problem with running a
`countDistinct` over a `DF` with 600 columns.
---
If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
`var` is mutà ble and the "default value" seems not exposed to users and
being changed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user HarshSharma8 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
May be this is right and readable from your point of view, this code is
returning nothing else, just null again and again as default value if user
along its other values are not present.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73428/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
It seems too tirival. The `default` seems even always `null`. I don't think
this is an improvement if there is no other specific reason. The original codes
are more readable to me.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #73427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73427/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73426/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73424/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73424 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73424/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73423/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user HarshSharma8 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
Refactored code to remove null representation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed the null value that was returned directly with null representation
and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73423/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #73419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73419/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17027
**[Test build #73425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73425/testReport)**
for PR 17027 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73420/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73418/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73418/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73417/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73422/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73422/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052#discussion_r102922775
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -393,6 +393,17 @@ case class
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052#discussion_r102922659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ case class Range(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73421/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73421/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
**[Test build #73416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73416/testReport)**
for PR 16907 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
**[Test build #73414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73414/testReport)**
for PR 17051 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976#discussion_r102916301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ import
Github user jaceklaskowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17042
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057#discussion_r102916099
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1952,4 +1952,54 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17042
Makes sense. Thanks @srowen!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055#discussion_r102915883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1952,4 +1952,49 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
401 - 500 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
