Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73503/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076
**[Test build #73505 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73505/testReport)**
for PR 17076 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
**[Test build #73503 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73503/testReport)**
for PR 17078 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73521/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
**[Test build #73521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73521/testReport)**
for PR 12896 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73512/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
**[Test build #73512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73512/testReport)**
for PR 16965 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
**[Test build #73524 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73524/testReport)**
for PR 16793 at commit
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
"The only way to fix this generally is to implement some periodic timer
that calls reviveOffers() if there are queued/pending drivers to be scheduled.
This can be chatty and complicates the code, so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #73523 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73523/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
**[Test build #73509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73509/testReport)**
for PR 17032 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929#discussion_r103262990
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2969,11 +2969,27 @@ object functions {
}
/**
- *
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031#discussion_r103261951
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterSchedulerSuite.scala
---
@@ -48,45 +48,50 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73522/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #73504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73504/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #73522 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73522/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73504/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73517/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
**[Test build #73517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73517/testReport)**
for PR 16793 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r103258743
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -909,16 +921,17 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
var
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
@thunterdb Copy that, working on it and sorry for the acknowledge delay.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Yeah, Scala Long matches. Here is the "stand-alone" script that I used to
confirm that everything works ok (tested on Spark 2.1):
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #73522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73522/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #73518 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73518/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73518/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
@mgummelt Yes they should look at the logs but how do they know this is
something that requires action from their side and not a cluster issue or
anything else. It should be documented since it is
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076#discussion_r103254026
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -440,19 +440,9 @@ private class LinearSVCAggregator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73500/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73500/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16809
**[Test build #73516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73516/testReport)**
for PR 16809 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
**[Test build #73521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73521/testReport)**
for PR 12896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #73518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73518/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
**[Test build #73517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73517/testReport)**
for PR 16793 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
**[Test build #73519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73519/testReport)**
for PR 16478 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73513/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73520/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #73514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73514/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
**[Test build #73503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73503/testReport)**
for PR 17078 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
**[Test build #73512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73512/testReport)**
for PR 16965 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73506/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16819
**[Test build #73515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73515/testReport)**
for PR 16819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
**[Test build #73509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73509/testReport)**
for PR 17032 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17079
**[Test build #73502 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73502/testReport)**
for PR 17079 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17080
**[Test build #73501 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73501/testReport)**
for PR 17080 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
**[Test build #73511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73511/testReport)**
for PR 16990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
**[Test build #73504 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73504/testReport)**
for PR 17077 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
**[Test build #73508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73508/testReport)**
for PR 17039 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076
**[Test build #73505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73505/testReport)**
for PR 17076 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73510/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73507/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17082
**[Test build #73499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73499/testReport)**
for PR 17082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17083
**[Test build #73498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73498/testReport)**
for PR 17083 at commit
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076#discussion_r103249915
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -440,19 +440,9 @@ private class LinearSVCAggregator(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73500 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73500/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076
Jenkins test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
Jenkins test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076#discussion_r103248918
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -440,19 +440,9 @@ private class LinearSVCAggregator(
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
This one would be good for @mlnick to look at.
The Scala Long will match java.lang.Number right? if so it works even if
there's another conversion there, but maybe that one is trivial, and
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
OK. I have reverted `set
hive.mapreduce.job.reduces.speculative.execution=false` to `set
hive.mapred.reduce.tasks.speculative.execution=false`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078#discussion_r103239934
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078#discussion_r103236865
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@srowen The following snippet handles explicitly Longs. It can be rewritten
to remove duplicate code by introducing bools for overflow detection but I
don't think it is worth it. In theory you can
Github user vitillo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17012#discussion_r103219157
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -274,6 +274,11 @@
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17068#discussion_r103214603
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -40,7 +41,19 @@ private[csv] object
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
@squito
Thanks a lot for your comments : )
>When check speculatable tasks in TaskSetManager, current code scan all
task infos and sort durations of successful tasks in O(NlogN) time
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
(I put a test here -
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071/files#diff-7e47859dbd409cc39f2908615fbd07ffR419)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103200223
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1515,12 +1515,12 @@ def test_oldhadoop(self):
conf = {
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
Jenkins retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
ping @MLnick @gatorsmile @thunterdb
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
@gatorsmile I'm glad it wasn't just me that found it complex ;-)
I've modified the patch to remove an unnecessary change as that query was
not ordered and the test suite code handles
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17083
Not sure why Jenkins test cannot be started automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076#discussion_r103187723
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -440,19 +440,9 @@ private class LinearSVCAggregator(
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r103187577
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -140,7 +137,7 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <:
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17080
LGTM. Verified option name in `org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Constants` file;
env var name in `com.amazonaws.SDKGlobalConfiguration'
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17083
Due to the change of (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625), the
issue is obsolete. So it effects spark 2.1 and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103185158
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/smb_mapjoin_25.q
---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select * from (select a.key from
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16809#discussion_r103185139
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala
---
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ case class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r103184528
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -615,35 +615,114 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Sure, sounds better and I can't find a reason to not follow. Let me maybe
add single small Java one somewhere because the deprecated Java one calls the
deprecated Scala one.
---
If your
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Ignore my comment about duplicate code. It can be written to avoid it. I
will investigate handling the SQL decimal types as you recommended and I will
update the code tonight.
---
If your
Github user jcamachor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103184073
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/smb_mapjoin_25.q
---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select * from (select a.key from
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r103183646
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -140,7 +137,7 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103183030
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/smb_mapjoin_25.q
---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select * from (select a.key from
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@srowen: Thanks for the comments. We are getting there. :)
I will handle the Long case as you suggest.
If you think people use SQL decimal types, I can include them at the end of
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17083
Was this fixed otherwise in master, or did some other change make it
obsolete? just trying to link this to whatever reason it's only a problem in
2.1, for the record.
---
If your project is set up
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103179898
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1515,12 +1515,12 @@ def test_oldhadoop(self):
conf = {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990#discussion_r103180859
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/resources/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/smb_mapjoin_25.q
---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select * from (select a.key from
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17083
[SPARK-19750][UI][branch-2.1] Fix redirect issue from http to https
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If spark ui port (4040) is not set, it will choose port number 0,
501 - 600 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
