Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73677/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
**[Test build #73682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73682/testReport)**
for PR 17117 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73682/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
**[Test build #73682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73682/testReport)**
for PR 17117 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
[SPARK-10780][ML] Support initial model for KMeans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support initial model for ```KMeans```.
## How was this patch tested?
Add
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73671/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
**[Test build #73671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73671/testReport)**
for PR 17114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73679/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
**[Test build #73679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73679/testReport)**
for PR 17115 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73672/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73672/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Few minor comments. Overall looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096#discussion_r103637509
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1035,17 +1036,22 @@ def test_approxQuantile(self):
def test_corr(self):
import math
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73681/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096#discussion_r103636686
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1405,18 +1405,18 @@ def approxQuantile(self, col, probabilities,
relativeError):
Added
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103636619
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
Yes please. The file doesn't exist. Its name suggests this is just an
example path.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
[SPARK-18890][CORE](try 2) Move task serialization from the TaskSetManager
to the CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
( @actuaryzhang , maybe we could make the PR title more meaningful to
summerise the change just for a better shaped PR )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73680/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #73668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73668/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
**[Test build #73670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73670/testReport)**
for PR 17056 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17064
@cloud-fan Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
I am modifying the hacky code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
**[Test build #73679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73679/testReport)**
for PR 17115 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
@felixcheung I see lots of the SparkDataFrame methods use the following in
examples:
```
path <- "path/to/file.json"
df <- read.json(path)
```
I'm not sure where this
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17115
[Doc][Minor] Update R doc
Update R doc:
1. columns, names and colnames returns a vector of strings, not **list** as
in current doc.
2. `colnames<-` does allow the subset assignment,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73678/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73677/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631341
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/ExecutorSuite.scala
---
@@ -164,17 +164,18 @@ class ExecutorSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631404
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -130,7 +152,7 @@ private[spark] object TaskDescription {
//
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631322
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +55,26 @@ private[spark] class TaskDescription(
val
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631360
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631278
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631373
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -195,6 +197,11 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631354
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/local/LocalSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -82,9 +88,15 @@ private[spark] class LocalEndpoint(
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631300
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631294
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631260
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631249
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +55,26 @@ private[spark] class TaskDescription(
val
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103631254
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17064
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73669/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
**[Test build #73669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73669/testReport)**
for PR 17099 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17064
thanks merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103630249
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1587,4 +1588,151 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103630036
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1587,4 +1588,151 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
But this time is the refuse time correct? As stated here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3202 I have 30 seconds for osme
other framework to accept resources in the list otherwise the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73676/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
**[Test build #73675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73675/testReport)**
for PR 17114 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73673/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73674/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
501 - 562 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
