Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
[SPARK-19993][SQL] Caching logical plans containing subquery expressions
does not work.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The sameResult() method does not work when the lo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74725/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74725/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
[`93b83ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
**[Test build #74728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74728/testReport)**
for PR 17315 at commit
[`10e70fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/10
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Please take a look, @tcondie @zsxwing !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
**[Test build #74727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74727/testReport)**
for PR 17329 at commit
[`e0a3b62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74726/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
[`ce39a9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ce
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295#discussion_r106588563
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala ---
@@ -73,55 +86,219 @@ private[spark] class DiskStore(conf: SparkConf,
diskManage
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74721/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
**[Test build #74721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74721/testReport)**
for PR 16209 at commit
[`e76b7e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295#discussion_r106587687
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1235,7 +1251,7 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
peer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74725/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
[`93b83ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/93
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74715/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587332
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587261
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587357
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587496
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/FPGrowthWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587413
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/FPGrowthWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587130
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587054
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587315
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r106587292
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
**[Test build #74715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74715/testReport)**
for PR 17329 at commit
[`dc5fd8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295#discussion_r106587428
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/security/CryptoStreamUtils.scala ---
@@ -102,4 +150,34 @@ private[spark] object CryptoStreamUtils extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295#discussion_r106587322
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/security/CryptoStreamUtils.scala ---
@@ -63,12 +83,40 @@ private[spark] object CryptoStreamUtils extends Lo
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74722/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
[`f4e771d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74724/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`ed6dacd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74723/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`703a6cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/70
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74714/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
**[Test build #74714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74714/testReport)**
for PR 17329 at commit
[`abcfc79`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74718/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74718/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`8c97406`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74710/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74710 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74710/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
[`8787db1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74717/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74717/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`00d67f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74719/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74719/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
[`ce39a9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74720/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74720/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`703a6cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74716/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
**[Test build #74716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74716/testReport)**
for PR 17302 at commit
[`43678e7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
Sounds like this was caused by a different PR (see the comment on the JIRA)
and is now being fixed, so never mind here!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295
makes sense. one more question, ideally, shall we also transfer shuffle
blocks after decryption?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
**[Test build #74721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74721/testReport)**
for PR 16209 at commit
[`e76b7e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e7
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
okay, I'll recheck the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
ok makes sense, let's support it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
LGTM except some minor comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106583389
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/JoinReorderSuite.scala
---
@@ -187,6 +220,8 @@ class JoinReorderSuite exten
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106583140
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -710,6 +710,14 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106583013
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -203,64 +205,46 @@ object JoinReorderDP e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106582845
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -272,26 +256,39 @@ object JoinReorderDP e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106582668
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -185,11 +184,14 @@ object JoinReorderDP e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286#discussion_r106582563
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -128,38 +131,34 @@ case class CostBasedJo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74713/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74713/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
[`5d8c853`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74707/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74720/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`703a6cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/70
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74707 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74707/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
[`1d0008c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74719/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
[`ce39a9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ce
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74718/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`8c97406`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74708/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
**[Test build #74708 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74708/testReport)**
for PR 17216 at commit
[`4733b4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74704/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
**[Test build #74704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74704/testReport)**
for PR 17327 at commit
[`daabb27`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74717/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`00d67f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/00
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
@cloud-fan In the mixed case, it seems PotgreSQL and MySQL support the
syntax;
```
// PostgreSQL v9.5
postgres=# \d t2
Table "public.t2"
Column | Type | Modifiers
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
**[Test build #74716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74716/testReport)**
for PR 17302 at commit
[`43678e7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
**[Test build #74715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74715/testReport)**
for PR 17329 at commit
[`dc5fd8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dc
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74702/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74699/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74702/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
[`8f7ffb3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74699/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
[`0f95c8b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
Does this PR mix in some test file?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
**[Test build #74714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74714/testReport)**
for PR 17329 at commit
[`abcfc79`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ab
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329
[SPARK-19991]FileSegmentManagedBuffer performance improvement
FileSegmentManagedBuffer performance improvement.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we do no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74705/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74705/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`7bf7db3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74709/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
1 - 100 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
