Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74809/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798739
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798726
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/Trigger.scala ---
@@ -38,6 +38,26 @@ sealed trait Trigger
/**
* ::
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798676
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/Trigger.scala ---
@@ -38,6 +38,51 @@ sealed trait Trigger
/**
* ::
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798581
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798566
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798671
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/Trigger.scala ---
@@ -38,6 +38,51 @@ sealed trait Trigger
/**
* ::
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798546
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798642
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798664
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/Trigger.scala ---
@@ -38,6 +38,51 @@ sealed trait Trigger
/**
* ::
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798601
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798501
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -291,10 +299,13 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798526
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -392,12 +400,26 @@ class StreamExecution(
*
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798638
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798639
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -419,14 +441,44 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106798713
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2438,7 +2438,8 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x =
"character"),
#' from_json
#'
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331#discussion_r106798699
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,18 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106798694
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -624,41 +627,58 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74808/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17310
Oh, no. I left them with `true` by default to keep the original behaviour.
It could look a bit odd because it is `false` in read and `true` in write by
default but I tried my best to keep the
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17310
is this a behavior change from 2.0/2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17314#discussion_r106798435
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/AFTSurvivalRegressionWrapper.scala
---
@@ -30,6 +32,7 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106798289
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -315,6 +315,18 @@ def _to_java_trigger(self, sqlContext):
self.interval)
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246
Few minor points.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246#discussion_r106798265
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.md ---
@@ -373,11 +374,213 @@ The following configurations are optional:
+##
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246#discussion_r106798256
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.md ---
@@ -373,11 +374,213 @@ The following configurations are optional:
+##
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246#discussion_r106798236
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.md ---
@@ -15,40 +15,42 @@ For Scala/Java applications using SBT/Maven project
definitions, link your
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246#discussion_r106798211
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.md ---
@@ -15,40 +15,42 @@ For Scala/Java applications using SBT/Maven project
definitions, link your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
**[Test build #74807 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74807/testReport)**
for PR 17344 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
cc @windpiger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
[SPARK-19990][TEST][test-maven][WIP] Use the database after Hive's current
Database is dropped
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the following test
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
@gatorsmile Thank you. It fails on a clean build as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Thank you @felixcheung for your review and proceeding this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17182
Thank you, @gatorsmile !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74806/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106797920
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Let me try to fix this flaky test. See the failure history of this test
case.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106797757
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -624,41 +627,58 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331#discussion_r106797733
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,18 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17182
Will do the work next week. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Yes, we need to extend the DDL parser to support the general user-defined
types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74805 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74805/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106797634
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1774,10 +1774,11 @@ def json_tuple(col, *fields):
def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106797619
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -624,41 +627,58 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74802/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74802/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331#discussion_r106797512
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,18 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17138#discussion_r106797505
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
The bug was introduced when we merge `SortMergeJoin` and
`SortMergerOuterJoin`
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11743/files#diff-b669f8cf35f1d2d786582f4d8c49ed14
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331#discussion_r106797457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,18 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74804 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74804/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331#discussion_r106797210
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,18 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74803/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74803 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74803/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74799/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74799/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Ah, my bad. I'll re-check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74797/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74797 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74797/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74795/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74795/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74794/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74794/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74801/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74801 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74801/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74800/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74800/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74798/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74798/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74796/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74796/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74803 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74803/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Hi, @rxin Could you please review this PR? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795788
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -655,6 +663,148 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795772
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +116,19 @@ object SubqueryExpression {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795763
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795750
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +116,19 @@ object SubqueryExpression {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74802 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74802/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74793/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74793/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
We have the same limitation. To do it in mySQL and Postgres, you need to
use quotes/backticks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Generally, it looks good to me. cc @hvanhovell @rxin @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795294
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -655,6 +663,148 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74792/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
**[Test build #74792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74792/testReport)**
for PR 17342 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +116,19 @@ object SubqueryExpression {
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
