Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795140
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +116,19 @@ object SubqueryExpression {
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Could you update this PR to have the parameter itemsCol
And remove predictionCol (if I recall, we don't expose that in the R API
for other models either)
---
If your project is
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r106795011
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +116,19 @@ object SubqueryExpression {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74800 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74800/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
LGTM pending Jenkins
cc @thunterdb @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74801 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74801/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
cc - @rxin, @squito, @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74799 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74799/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
**[Test build #74798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74798/testReport)**
for PR 17343 at commit
GitHub user sitalkedia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
[SPARK-20014] Optimize mergeSpillsWithFileStream method
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the individual partition size in a spill is small,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74797/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74796/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
updated. pretty sure this is an issue on Windows only
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74795/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17341
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
yes,it is.
It (jar:file://) will be re-resolved by new Path later, and will throw an
exception described in the jira.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74794/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r106794245
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2909,6 +2910,30 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106793811
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74793/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106794013
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -624,41 +627,58 @@ case class
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106794032
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,340 @@ package
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106793959
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -624,41 +627,58 @@ case class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106793800
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1774,10 +1774,11 @@ def json_tuple(col, *fields):
def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106793947
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/StarJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106793898
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16982
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74791/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74791 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74791/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
@budde Do you think you can update this PR? The 2.2 branch will be cut on
Monday (2017-03-18).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Adding a check in the existing test case to see if `HIVE_TYPE_STRING` is
correctly populated in the metadata.
LGTM except a few minor comments
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106792988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -2178,4 +2177,136 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106792941
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -175,6 +178,74 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106792952
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ class InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106792918
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -450,6 +451,21 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106792896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -450,6 +451,21 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
**[Test build #74792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74792/testReport)**
for PR 17342 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
`org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerProactiveReplicationSuite.proactive
block replication - 3 replicas - 2 block manager deletions` failed, but it
passed locally.
---
If your project is set
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
>> I don't think its true that it relaunches all tasks that hadn't
completed when the fetch failure occurred. it relaunches all the tasks haven't
completed, by the time the stage gets
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17334
**[Test build #3603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3603/testReport)**
for PR 17334 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74790/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
**[Test build #74790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74790/testReport)**
for PR 17342 at commit
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106791067
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/StarJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106790932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74788/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74788/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74791/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106790507
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SimpleCatalystConf.scala
---
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ case class SimpleCatalystConf(
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106790475
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106790425
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106790141
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1860,4 +1861,119 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17334
**[Test build #3603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3603/testReport)**
for PR 17334 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17311
Hi, @vanzin and @srowen .
Could you review this PR (again) when you have sometime?
I feel guilty because this PR need to be verified by manually on kerberized
clusters.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Hi, @cloud-fan .
Is it possible that Spark 2.1.1 includes this fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74786/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #74786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74786/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Had a minor comment on the test case. LGTM otherwise and waiting for Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r106789593
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2909,6 +2910,30 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a timestamp
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106788877
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ case object TaskResultLost extends TaskFailedReason {
*
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106789380
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +540,39 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106788727
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106789297
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +540,39 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106789004
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -467,7 +474,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106789403
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106789422
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106789293
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Ok sounds good. Since this touches spark-submit scripts that are shared
across all languages it would be good to get loop in some other reviewers as
well. I can do that once we have the new diff
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106789103
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -83,9 +411,19 @@ object ReorderJoin extends
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106789008
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
**[Test build #74790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74790/testReport)**
for PR 17342 at commit
GitHub user weiqingy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
[SPARK-18910][SPARK-12868] Allow adding jars from hdfs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark 2.2 is going to be cut, it'll be great if SPARK-12868 can be resolved
before
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106788869
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106788720
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106788630
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,347 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17334
**[Test build #3602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3602/testReport)**
for PR 17334 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
That's fine I can add a warning. I don't know if it is a bug situation but
it sure could be.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290#discussion_r106788142
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockInfoManager.scala ---
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ private[storage] class BlockInfoManager extends
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
Right. I misread it. if there is no join predicate between a table and any
cluster of tables, we should not consider that table in the join enumeration at
all. We can simply push that table to be the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16982
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74787/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16982
**[Test build #74787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74787/testReport)**
for PR 16982 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
@felixcheung It is completely up to you. I'll have to patch one or another
(and also #17218) and at the end of the day it doesn't make much difference.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
@gatorsmile Your example is correct.
Given A J1 B J2 C:
⢠level 0: (A), (B), (C)
⢠level 1: {A, B}, ~{A, C}~, {B, C}
⢠level 3: {A, B, C}
Given A J1 B J2 C
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246
**[Test build #74789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74789/testReport)**
for PR 17246 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74789/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
I will do another pass today and merge if others do not have more concerns?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
I suppose we should wait on #17321 before acting on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
My example is not related to inequality join or equi join.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274#discussion_r106787436
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ test_that("add and get file to be downloaded with
Spark job on every node",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17246
**[Test build #74789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74789/testReport)**
for PR 17246 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
@gatorsmile An equality join in most cases has a better filtering than an
inequality join. This can be used heuristically. However, this is not always
true. An equality join can be a lookup join from
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
test failed on appveyor - it looks like the connection to JVM is dead
```
. Error: add and get file to be downloaded with Spark job on every node
(@test_context.R#184)
101 - 200 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
