Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74811/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74810/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74808/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17138
Found a very interesting paper for analyzing the existing DP algorithms for
join reordering with a new solution in VLDB 2006.
[Analysis of Two Existing and One New Dynamic Programming Algorit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74809/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74807/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74812/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
[`e33b50a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e3
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
If we make flush() noop, then buffered (uncommitted) data wont be written
to the stream; am I missing something here, or is this change broken ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Background - you need to do a flush() to ensure the indices generated are
valid.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #74813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74813/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
[`0c64245`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0c
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74814/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`6ac57d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6a
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
This test case passed, but we still have multiple other test cases failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Ah, looks like I missed that CountingOutputStream was introduced after BOS
and not before.
Looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74815/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
[`497646e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/49
GitHub user snowch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
[SPARK-20011][ML][DOCS] Clarify documentation for ALS 'rank' parameter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
API documentation and collaborative filtering documentation page ch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219#discussion_r106800936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/BatchCommitLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user xwu0226 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74816/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
[`1eb7cd3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1e
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74817/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
[`e4c41dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e4
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
@gatorsmile what do you think of this vs
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
**[Test build #74812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74812/testReport)**
for PR 16596 at commit
[`e33b50a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74812/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74813/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74814/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`6ac57d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74814/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74815/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
[`497646e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74815/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17344
LGTMï¼but why maven test has this problemï¼
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74817/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
[`e4c41dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74817/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
**[Test build #74818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74818/testReport)**
for PR 17345 at commit
[`1359e07`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/13
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #74819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74819/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
[`19d0d48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/19
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
[WIP] DataFrame batch reader may fail to infer partitions when reading
FileStreamSink's output
WIP of SPARK-19965
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #74819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74819/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
[`19d0d48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74819/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74818/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
**[Test build #74818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74818/testReport)**
for PR 17345 at commit
[`1359e07`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17345
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74816/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
[`1eb7cd3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74816/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #74820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74820/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
[`0e35db7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0e
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
[SPARK-19980][SQL] Add NULL checks in Bean serializer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A Bean serializer in `ExpressionEncoder` could change values when Beans
having NULL. A
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
**[Test build #74821 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74821/testReport)**
for PR 17347 at commit
[`093b4e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/09
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74821/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
**[Test build #74821 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74821/testReport)**
for PR 17347 at commit
[`093b4e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
@gatorsmile How about this? It seems we have the same behaviour;
```
// PostgreSQL
postgres=# select gkey1 AS "2", gkey2, count(value) from t2 group by "2", 2;
2 | gkey2 | count
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #74823 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74823/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
[`dd7822e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
**[Test build #74822 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74822/testReport)**
for PR 17347 at commit
[`77458a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/77
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #74823 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74823/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
[`dd7822e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74823/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106806437
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -233,81 +187,39 @@ class UnivocityParser(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #74820 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74820/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
[`0e35db7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74820/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17348
[SPARK-20018][SQL] Pivot with timestamp and count should not print internal
representation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when we perform count with tim
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17348
cc @aray and @cloud-fan, could you take a look and see if it makes sense?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17348
**[Test build #74824 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74824/testReport)**
for PR 17348 at commit
[`3c619df`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3c
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
I haven't forgotten this; I've just been trying to make the module
POM-only, while adding support for Hadoop 2.6 builds, which is causing some
issues downstream. Specifically, my downstream c
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
[MINOR][R] Reorder `Collate` fields in DESCRIPTION file
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems cran check scripts corrects `R/pkg/DESCRIPTION` and follows the
ord
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
@felixcheung, could you check this? I just realised that running this
script keeps producing this small diff in my local.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
**[Test build #74825 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74825/testReport)**
for PR 17349 at commit
[`18b18b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/18
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
**[Test build #74822 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74822/testReport)**
for PR 17347 at commit
[`77458a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17347
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74822/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
**[Test build #74825 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74825/testReport)**
for PR 17349 at commit
[`18b18b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74825/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17348
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17348
Thank you for your sign-off @aray.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343
Can you add some documentation inline so in the future we'd know why
specific implementations were chosen?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
@mridulm
Thanks a lot for helping review this : ) really appreciate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Done. I marked it as blocked by SPARK-19899 and leave it to be retested
once #17321 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #74826 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74826/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
[`706514d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/70
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74826/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #74826 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74826/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
[`706514d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
__Note__: should be retested after #17321
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
**[Test build #74827 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74827/testReport)**
for PR 17218 at commit
[`0a3798d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
**[Test build #74827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74827/testReport)**
for PR 17218 at commit
[`0a3798d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74827/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
