Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17352
@felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335#discussion_r106828435
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +354,25 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286
@ioana-delaney Thanks for the replies.
> Given A J1 B J2 C: - case 1
⢠level 0: (A), (B), (C)
⢠level 1: {A, B}, ~~{A, C}~~, {B, C}
⢠level 3: {A, B, C}
Given A J1 B J2
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
ah...somehow I missed this email.
I like this idea, the comments here would be that `if the last screenshot
is the latest design, will the user have to sum up the total amount of used
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74843/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
[`02d44aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/02
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #74844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
[`a1f9327`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a1
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Yeah, I can support for getting this into 2.2 if others are busy. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
Without code changes,
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/ still
can pass after triggering a retest. I think it is not related to this PR.
---
If your proje
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
It sounds like it is not related to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290. Without the changes, we still can
pass it after trigging another retest. Let us focus on the remaining failure.
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
[SPARK-17080][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Improve documentation and naming for
methods/variables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve documentation and naming for methods/variables
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
**[Test build #74835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74835/testReport)**
for PR 17331 at commit
[`e4c41dc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74835/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74845/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
[`7598eb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74842/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`891813f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74842/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`a02d3d6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335#discussion_r106831705
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -353,6 +354,25 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74836/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
That's a good idea, thanks @CodingCat .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ioana-delaney commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jianran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17334
@SparkQA why I changed exception msg causes the test failed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
I might knew the root cause of the remaining two failures. : ) When we call
`setCurrentDatabase`, the current database of the Hive client is not reset. Let
me try it.
---
If your project is se
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74837/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`b1125fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74837/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
**[Test build #74846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74846/testReport)**
for PR 17274 at commit
[`3292da7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74838/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`fdc9d2a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74838/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74847/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`891813f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/89
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74848/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74840/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`0a05bfa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74849/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
[`eafc386`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74840/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
> when the stage fails because of fetch failure, we remove the stage from
the output commiter. So if any task completes between the time of first fetch
failure and the time stage is resubmitted, will
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833737
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833868
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #74844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
[`a1f9327`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106833748
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74844/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
[SPARK-20024] [SQL] SessionCatalog API setCurrentDatabase need to set the
current database of ExternalCatalog [WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SessionCatalog API se
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
ping @cloud-fan @hvanhovell Can you help review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17186
ping @sameeragarwal This is updated according to your previous comment. Can
you help review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74848/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74848/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
add #17290 again, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74851/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #74852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74852/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
[`a1f9327`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74850/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
[`c552c78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
[SPARK-19955][WIP][PySpark] Jenkins Python Conda based test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow Jenkins Python tests to use the installed conda to test Python 2.7
su
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
**[Test build #74853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74853/testReport)**
for PR 17355 at commit
[`267837c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/26
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
LGTM pending Jenkins
Note, this is for fixing `create temporary view using` only.
@windpiger Can you remove [test-maven] and trigger another test again?
Thanks!
---
If your pr
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
test sbt, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74854/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
[`c552c78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74855/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353#discussion_r106835632
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -201,7 +201,16 @@ object JoinReorderDP e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74851/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74851/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353#discussion_r106835910
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -201,7 +201,16 @@ object JoinReorderDP e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Could you also update the description of `object JoinReorderDP` based on
the recent update in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17286?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
@squito
Thanks :) already refined.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Could we move the checking `if
(oneSidePlan.itemIds.intersect(otherSidePlan.itemIds).isEmpty)` into the
`buildJoin`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Replace the following codes by using `pattern match`
```
if (joinPlan.isDefined) {
val newJoinPlan = joinPlan.get
```
---
If your project is set up for
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
mvn, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17338
**[Test build #74856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74856/testReport)**
for PR 17338 at commit
[`d5740d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
**[Test build #74857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74857/testReport)**
for PR 17315 at commit
[`aa6736f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/aa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74858/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
[`36c205a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/36
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74854/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
[`c552c78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74854/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74859/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
[`c552c78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74845/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
[`7598eb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74843/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
[`02d44aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74845/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17351
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74843/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17351
merged this to master ahead of the code freeze
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74849/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
[`eafc386`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74849/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74860/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
[`c552c78`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
201 - 300 of 351 matches
Mail list logo