Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r118175283
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17891#discussion_r118175057
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -807,6 +807,18 @@ def test_logistic_regression(self):
except OSError:
pass
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #77288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77288/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
[`1a5747b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
@MrBago Yeah, after a quick scan, seems other `reshape` usage in MLlib are
ok.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MrBago commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
@viirya I was running python tests for pyspark-ml and pyspark-mllib and
this was the only place where the python3/numpy interaction caused a test
failure. There might be other places where floor int
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17150
**[Test build #3752 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3752/testReport)**
for PR 17150 at commit
[`7a30de4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user MrBago commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
@srowen floor divide has been in python since 2.2,
https://www.python.org/download/releases/2.2/.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
Nit: usually we won't specially tag it is a BugFix in the title.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
I think so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
To test it in jenkins might need a specified numpy version, but the code
change looks ok.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
Dumb question but this still works in Python 2.6+ right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18081
LGTM
Do we have similar cases in MLlib?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77294/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`cba784b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77293/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
[`039d063`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18080
I don't think you can just change the behavior. It would possibly break
apps and I presume no longer matches Hive. If it already implements a standard
too, it sounds like it is correct. A second met
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77285/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
[`222680c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r118168255
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -233,10 +223,129 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r118168228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -233,10 +223,129 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77293/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
[`039d063`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/03
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17455
Usually new features aren't added to branches after they've been cut, and
almost never after an rc has been cut. So given branch-2.2 was cut over a month
ago and we're about to cut rc3, I'm pretty
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77292/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77292/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`eb0598e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77291/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77291/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`1c1cc9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77292/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`eb0598e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/eb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77290/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77290/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`2bf0590`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
Thank you. Absolutely, it is easier to review this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77291/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`1c1cc9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1c
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r118165399
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -792,7 +887,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r118165051
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -174,17 +174,19 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
this(sqlContext.sparkSe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77290/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`2bf0590`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2b
Github user agsimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17455
Any chance this can get into v2.2.0? I am using Spark in Docker with nginx
reverse proxy and this would help immensely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77278/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
**[Test build #77278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77278/testReport)**
for PR 18076 at commit
[`bc66ec5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77280/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18079
**[Test build #77280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77280/testReport)**
for PR 18079 at commit
[`902d2a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
**[Test build #77289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77289/testReport)**
for PR 18083 at commit
[`a46c247`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16225
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77282/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16225
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16225
**[Test build #77282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77282/testReport)**
for PR 16225 at commit
[`b5424d9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r118162963
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -629,7 +736,9 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77286/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
LGTM as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77286/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`c0bee01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77284/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77284/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`f3e4208`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77279/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18073
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18073
**[Test build #77279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77279/testReport)**
for PR 18073 at commit
[`14e09aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77283/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77283/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`5c53f0f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user janewangfb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
@cloud-fan, there are difference between `xyz` and xyz. we always need to
extract xyz part from `xyz`, so we will need to pattern match. if we do not get
pattern matched, we know it is not regex,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
**[Test build #77287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77287/testReport)**
for PR 11974 at commit
[`46d9c7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r118160405
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1230,25 +1230,37 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77281/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77281/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`f5f0524`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r118159701
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtils.scala
---
@@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ object ParserUtils {
sb.t
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
@cloud-fan The current behavior always using `float` , but using `double`
can reduce loss of precision,so ,I think using `double` will be better
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17310
This is an API change which we generally don't backport to a patch release.
Can you elaborate on why you need it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
I have tested in MYSQL, the result datatype seems to be `decimalType`:
mysql> desc test;
++-+--+-+-+---+
| Field | Type| Null | Key | Def
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18073#discussion_r118158352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormatSuite.scala
---
@@ -26,6 +26,22 @@ import org.apache.s
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18077
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18077
Merging with master and branch-2.2 which means this will get into 2.2.0
Thanks for the quick fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #77288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77288/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
[`1a5747b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77274/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18076
**[Test build #77274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77274/testReport)**
for PR 18076 at commit
[`72cee6e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77276/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77276/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
[`984bab7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18077
Other than the tags, this LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18077
@MrBago Can you please add the tags "[ML][PYTHON]" to the title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11974
**[Test build #77287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77287/testReport)**
for PR 11974 at commit
[`46d9c7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/46
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77286/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`c0bee01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c0
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
In current change:
1) remove the partial written file when failing
2) remove all shuffle files when `cleanup()`(this is registered as a task
completion callback)
---
If your project is se
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
Done. Should i delete the unit test case from `MathFunctionsSuite.scala`?
@gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r118155011
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -912,3 +913,17 @@ case class Deduplicat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77285/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
[`222680c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/22
Github user yangw1234 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
@gatorsmile Sorry, I totally forget this pr. I will try to address the
comment this week (need a little time to re-familiarize the context).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77284/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
[`f3e4208`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77271/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18078
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
